Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04371
Original file (BC-2011-04371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04371 

 

 COUNSEL: NO 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 26.5 days of lost leave be restored. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

During the past year, he was not allowed to take leave due to 
constant deployments. During the short periods he was home, he 
was expected to be in training for his next deployment. The Air 
Mobility Command’s (AMC) policy guidance was to not allow leave 
except in cases of emergencies. He had 2 weeks of leave 
cancelled and was denied an additional 3 weeks of leave. He 
believes being denied leave without recourse is an injustice. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his Leave and 
Earnings Statement and an e-mail regarding AMC guidance. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade 
of captain (O-3). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave 
Program, states in part the member’s application must clearly 
establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the 
member’s lost leave. DPSIM requested additional information 
from the applicant to support his claim. Specifically, they 
requested a letter from the applicant’s unit commander 
addressing his inability to take leave due to mission 


requirements along with temporary duty or deployment orders. 
The applicant did not submit the requested information. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 February 2012, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not clearly established that he has been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04371 in Executive Session on 8 May 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to BCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04371 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 20 Jan 12. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01528

    Original file (BC-2011-01528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the member’s leave was correctly determined when it was taken and there is no entitlement to a correction of records based on the difference between the AFI rule and the policy set forth in DoDI 1327.06. Many members made leave plans based on rules in effect at the time in order to make best use of their leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00586

    Original file (BC-2011-00586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit B). _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial due to the applicant’s inability to provide sufficient evidence of material error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 2011.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03804

    Original file (BC-2012-03804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFMOA/SGHI recommends granting the applicant’s request to remain on active duty orders and receive service points for the time period of 13 Sep through 26 Oct 12 [sic] indicating, the applicant would not have been released from active duty, but would have received six weeks of physical therapy for his injury had his injury originally been found in the line of duty (LOD). While the evidence of record indicates that his line of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01298

    Original file (BC-2012-01298.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    During this time the applicant was forced to use 51 days of leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that fifty-one (51) days of leave were restored to his account commencing 2 October 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04460

    Original file (BC-2011-04460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. If the Board restores leave to current leave account, members must use these days before the end of the current FY.” On 29 Nov 2011, DPSIMC requested additional documentation from the applicant to support his claim; specifically orders received from all deployments that prevented him from using the lost four days of leave during FY 2011. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302

    Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02326

    Original file (BC-2012-02326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, paragraph 10.9.7., states in part, member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 July 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027

    Original file (BC-2012-01027.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471

    Original file (BC-2012-03471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...