Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00462
Original file (BC-2010-00462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00462 

 INDEX CODE: 110.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 
upgraded. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He needs his discharge upgraded in order to receive medical 
benefits. He was recently released from prison and is living in a 
halfway house. He is praying the Board will find it in their 
hearts to approve his request. 

 

The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation. 

 

His complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 10 Mar 75. He 
was under charges for violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of 
Military Justice (UCMJ), for two specifications of possession of 
amphetamines and two specifications of possession of marijuana. He 
submitted a letter requesting discharge under AFM 39-12, paragraph 
2-78, for the good of the service. After a legal review of the 
case file, the staff judge advocate found the case legally 
sufficient and recommended the applicant receive an undesirable 
discharge. On 21 Jun 76, the applicant’s commander recommended he 
be discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of 
AFM 39-12, Section F. The applicant was counseled and elected to 
accept his discharge. The applicant received a UOTHC on 25 Jun 76 
after serving 1 year, 3 months, and 16 days on active duty. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, 
which is at Exhibit C. A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days on 26 May 10. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the evidence 
of record, the discharge was consistent with the substantive 
requirements of the discharge regulation and within the 
commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided 
no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization 
of his service was contrary to the provisions of the governing 
regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses 
committed. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the 
relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-00462 in Executive Session on 8 Jul 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-
00462 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Feb 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 May 10. 


 Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03148

    Original file (BC-2010-03148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01140

    Original file (BC-2004-01140.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived his right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, chose not to submit a statement in his own behalf, and requested not to be considered for the probation and rehabilitation (P&R) program. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 18 March 1974 and ordered an undesirable characterization without P&R. While we note the applicant’s assertion that he has not been in any trouble since his separation, the seriousness of the offenses for which the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02343

    Original file (BC-2010-02343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02267

    Original file (BC-2011-02267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Aug 73, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendation for an undesirable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. He accumulated 398 days of lost time, which includes 4 days absent without leave from 9 Aug 73 to 12 Aug 73, and 389 days of confinement from 31 Aug 73 to 23 Sep 74. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01583

    Original file (BC-2008-01583.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was addicted to marijuana for many years of his life. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, dated 26 Jun 08, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01948

    Original file (BC-2011-01948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 Feb 84, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to honorable. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we note the applicant does not contend that his discharge from the Air Force was inappropriate, or that the actions taken to effect his discharge and the characterization of his service were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time. Exhibit C. FBI Investigation,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04202

    Original file (BC-2008-04202.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04202 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. At that time, he was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02040

    Original file (BC-2007-02040.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 June 1973, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Chapter 2, Section D, paragraph 2-55, and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate, with a UOTHC service characterization. They concluded that the evidence submitted was insufficient to warrant a change in the type or nature of the discharge (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit B). At the time of the applicant’s discharge, the service characterization received was appropriate under the provisions of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01989

    Original file (BC-2010-01989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01989 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _______________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists for us to recommend an upgrade to the applicant’s UOTHC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00868

    Original file (BC-2010-00868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable (other than honorable conditions) (OTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, as of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...