Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00943
Original file (BC-2010-00943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00943 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
an honorable discharge. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was informed that after being discharged his character of 
service would be upgraded. 

 

The applicant provides no supporting documentation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 December 
1981. 

 

The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to 
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the 
provisions of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-31. The specific reasons 
were positive urinalysis for the use of marijuana on 1 March 
1983, 16 August 1983, and on 19 August 1983. 

 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged 
receipt of the notification. After consulting with counsel, the 
applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf. 

 

In a legal review of the case file, the staff judge advocate 
found the case legally sufficient and recommended discharge. The 
discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and 
directed discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) 
discharge. The applicant was discharged on 21 October 1983. He 
served 1 year, 10 months and 14 days on active duty. 

 

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an 
arrest record which is at Exhibit C. 


 

On 17 May 2010, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation and a 
request for information pertaining to his post-service activities 
were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. 
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which 
to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00943 in Executive Session on 13 October 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 


 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00943 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 February 2010. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Federal Bureau of Investigation Report. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 May 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03029

    Original file (BC-2010-03029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 23 March 1982 in the grade of airman (E- 2). On 19 April 1983, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04674

    Original file (BC-2010-04674.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04674 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 24...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03105

    Original file (BC-2008-03105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03105 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00200

    Original file (BC-2010-00200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00200 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In response to our request, applicant provided post- service information, which is attached at Exhibit D. On 6 Apr 10, the applicant requested to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02629

    Original file (BC 2010 02629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02629 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 23 November 1985, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and directed discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01300

    Original file (BC-2010-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01300 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00930

    Original file (BC-2010-00930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00930 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01696

    Original file (BC-2010-01696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01696 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an arrest record which is at Exhibit C. On 25...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00462

    Original file (BC-2010-00462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00462 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 21 Jun 76, the applicant’s commander recommended he be discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Section F. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01834

    Original file (BC-2010-01834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01834 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...