RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00166 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was denied Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) education benefits because his discharge was characterized as general (under honorable conditions). He would like his discharge upgraded so he can receive education benefits. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal letter and copies of his DD Forms 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 9 October 1947 and was promoted to the grade of airman second class effective 11 December 1953. He was discharged effective 17 May 1955 with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge after serving 7 years, 6 months, and 13 days on active duty. In response to the applicant’s request for records, a National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 25 August 2004, indicates the applicant’s military service records may have been destroyed in the 12 July 1973 fire; therefore, the requested records were not available. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigation Report. On 21 July 2010, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities and the FBI Report (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00166 in Executive Session on 21 September 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00166: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. FBI Report #209344D, dated 1 Jul 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Jul 10, w/atch. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Panel Chair