Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04212
Original file (BC-2011-04212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04212 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of “4K” (Medically disqualified for 
continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by 
MEB/PEB), be changed. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He believes his record to be in error due to a misdiagnosis which 
led to his discharge. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from 
his psychologist who states the applicant does not have and has 
never had major depressive disorder or any other major mental 
illness. He further states the applicant is an excellent 
candidate for military service and would be an outstanding asset 
to any branch of the military. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 November 
2009. 

 

The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to 
recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the provisions 
of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208. The specific reason was on or 
about 17 March 2010, the applicant was diagnosed as having a 
Major Depressive Disorder and an Anxiety Disorder. His 
depression and anxiety were so severe that his ability to 
function effectively in the military was significantly impaired. 
The applicant stated that he had a lack of motivation, decreased 
energy, decreased appetite, body aches, insomnia, an inability to 
concentrate and suicidal thoughts that the mental health 
professionals described as passive suicidal ideation. Based on 
his emotional state and behavior in class, and the fact that his 
behavior was not likely to change in the future - it was apparent 


that he could not function in the Air Force. Therefore, he was 
removed from his technical training apprentice course. 

 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and after consulting 
with counsel he elected not to submit statements on his own 
behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the 81st TRW/JAJ 
found the case legally sufficient and recommended separation. 
The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and 
directed an entry level separation. The applicant was discharged 
on 7 April 2010. He served 4 months and 21 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the 
documentation on file in the master personnel records the 
discharge to include the RE code and separation code was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. DPSOS found no evidence of an error or 
injustice in the processing of the applicant’s discharge or that 
the applicant was pending a Medical Evaluation Board. 

 

The DPSOS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial to change the RE code to an eligible 
RE code. DPSOA states the applicant received an erroneous RE 
code on his DD Form 214 of “4K”. His correct RE code is 2C 
(Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry 
level separation without characterization of service); as 
required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, chapter 3, 
based on his entry level separation with an uncharacterized 
character of service. The RE code 2C applies to all entry level 
separations without characterization of service regardless 
whether the discharge is voluntary or involuntary. The applicant 
will be provided a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE 
code of 2C. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 10 February 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant's complete submission was thoroughly reviewed and his 
contentions were duly noted. However, we do not find the 
applicant’s assertions and the documentation presented in support 
of his appeal sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale 
provided by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility 
(OPRs). However, we note AFPC/DPSOA will correct the applicant’s 
RE Code to 2C to appropriately reflect his entry level separation 
with uncharacterized service. We agree with this correction. 
Therefore, relief beyond that already administratively granted is 
not warranted 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04212 in Executive Session on 30 May 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04212 was considered: 


 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 October 2011, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 4 January 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 23 January 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 February 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03928

    Original file (BC-2010-03928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4K, which denotes “medically disqualified or pending medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB)” be changed to a RE code that will allow her to reenlist without a waiver. On 27 March 2002, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01455

    Original file (BC-2011-01455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 7 July 2010, the applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03996

    Original file (BC-2011-03996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he was discharged from the Air Force his brother was diagnosed with cancer and he was trying to deal with the situation. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Within his first 48 hours of Basic Military Training (BMT), he was assigned as the Guide-on Bearer for his flight....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03053

    Original file (BC-2010-03053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service), her narrative reason for separation of “Personality Disorder,” and her separation code of “JFX.”,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02383

    Original file (BC-2010-02383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02383 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOS recommends his records be corrected to reflect "Secretarial Authority" with a separation code of "KFF". _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02386

    Original file (BC-2010-02386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02386 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed be to a code that will allow him reentry into military service. Prior to 2003, the Services...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02803

    Original file (BC 2010 02803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02803 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Prior to his discharge, the applicant was provided a complete dental examination; however, all appropriate dental services and treatment were not provided by the Air Force within 90 days of his separation. Therefore, in order to preclude a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00858

    Original file (BC-2010-00858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 December 2006, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a mental disorder. As noted by the Separations Branch, at the time of the applicant’s separation from the Air Force, all members discharged due to a mental disorder fell under a blanket SPD code of JFX with a narrative reason of Personality Disorder. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00530

    Original file (BC-2012-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00530 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The legal review for discharge action by the staff judge advocate reflects an investigation was conducted regarding two allegations by the applicant of sexual assault. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states although certain documents of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04207

    Original file (BC-2010-04207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04207 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry-level separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service) be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at...