RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04564
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect she was promoted to technical
sergeant (TSgt) and subsequently retired.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was forced to transfer to the Inactive Ready Reserve (IRR)
because her security clearance was terminated due to past
financial issues; as a result, she missed the opportunity to be
promoted to TSgt after she had fulfilled the requirements for the
promotion. She served honorably for 23 years and should have
been retired. She was not given any notice or information prior
to requesting retirement orders and is unable to obtain a retired
identification (ID) card.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K reviewed this application and recommends denial. Air
Force Reserve enlisted members are recommended for promotion by
the assigned supervisor and approved by the promotion authority.
The supervisor has the sole discretion to recommend promotion to
the promotion authority when an individual has met the promotion
eligibility requirements for promotion to the next higher grade.
As for her request related to retirement, Air Force Reserve
members must have 20 years of satisfactory service or have 15 but
less than 20 years of satisfactory service and be subject to
involuntary discharge based on physical disqualification from
continued military service to qualify for a Reserve retirement.
The applicants Point Summary Credit reflects she has 16 years of
satisfactory service. Furthermore, there is no documentation to
indicate the applicant was subject to discharge due to a physical
disqualification from continued military service. As for her
contention she was forced to transfer to the IRR due to her
security clearance issues, the Automated Records Management
System (ARMS) reflects she was transferred to the IRR based on
her voluntary request; and was subsequently separated from the
IRR due to the expiration of her term of service. Therefore,
since she was not retirement eligible, she would not have been
provided notice or information for requesting retirement orders
or an ID card.
In addition, A1KP contacted the applicant, requesting
documentation to substantiate her request. The applicant stated
the commander had retired and could not be reached.
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
27 May 11 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions
stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence
of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
she was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-04564 in Executive Session on 18 Oct 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Nov 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1K, dated 7 May 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02026
According the AF Form 1411, dated 5 Aug 2012, the applicant requested a 6 month extension for the purpose of Reenlistment (Security Clearance). On 5 Aug 12, his commander recommended approval. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02026 in Executive Session on 4 Mar 14 and 14 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00013
After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we are not persuaded her records should be corrected to show she was promoted to technical sergeant (E-6). We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of proof of the existence of either an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00072
Regarding the applicants request that she be given a 20 year active duty retirement with full retirement benefits, A1K states that her medical case which included the applicable documentation that ultimately led to a finding of ILOD was appropriately reviewed and a determination was made on that case by the PEB. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant certainly...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available documentation indicated that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Dec 88 in the grade of airman for a period of six years. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s staff request, the Directorate of Military Law, AFRC/JAJM, reviewed this application and recommended denial. JAJM indicated that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02153
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03153
He be reinstated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 October 2010, with award of IDT points consistent with the average IDT points he earned between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2010. In this respect, we believe the evidence provided makes it clear that a serious personality conflict existed between the applicant and certain members of his chain of command as validated by Inspector General (IG) complaints filed by his supervisory chain and the applicant himself, as well...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04582
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her involuntary demotion order, a copy of NRPCC 1070/124, Naval Reserve Personnel Center Annual Retirement Point Record, a copy of a letter from the Naval Reserve Force Commander, an excerpt from AFI 36-2503-, Administrative Demotion of Airmen, and copies of her LES. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05625
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 December 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Title 38 of the United States Code mandates a service member to complete six years of satisfactory service and the member must also agree to serve four additional years in the Selected Reserve when transferring benefits to their dependents. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01630
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01630 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) be changed from 5 Mar 14 to 13 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...