RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03576
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his unit may have overlooked awarding him the MSM
because he did not have an official retirement ceremony. After
separating from the Regular Air Force, he served in the Arizona
Air National Guard from which he retired on 26 Sep 08. His other
awards include seven MSMs; two Air Force Good Conduct Medals,
three Air Force Achievement Medals, and many other medals and
awards.
In support of his request, the applicant provides excerpts from
his military personnel file.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Air National Guard and retired on
26 Sep 08 in the grade of master sergeant (E-7), having assumed
that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jun 06.
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in
the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS states that after conferring
with the applicants unit, the approval authority did not concur
on the MSM submission. Per an e-mail communication from the
applicants unit, they do not believe the award is an entitlement
and they did not believe he was deserving of the medal at the
time of his enlistment and upon his retirement.
The NGB/A1PS complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit
B.
NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS concurs with the Subject Matter
Expert advisory.
The NGB/A1PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Mar 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-03576 in Executive Session on 19 Apr 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Oct 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letters, NGB/A1PS, dated 8 Mar 11, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Mar 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03802
The Assistant Adjutant Generals policy, at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserve section, in April 1993, considered only field grade officers and above and senior enlisted members for award of the MSM. The complete ANG/A1PS evaluation is at exhibit C. NGB/A1P states they concur with the NGB/A1PS advisory and recommend relief not be granted based on the Air Force policy. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00795 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the period of 26 Sep 11 to January 2012. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05912
In addition, the Department of Defense Inspector General (IG DoD/MRI) concurred with the determination, approved the report, and substantiated the allegations (Exhibit B). We note that based on the Report of Investigation (ROI) from the SAF/IG the applicant was the victim of reprisal under the Whistleblower Protection Act (10 USC 1034) by his former commander who denied his reenlistment and attendance at the Chief Executive Course (CEC). Other than the comments in the ROI, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02768
After being successful in reenlisting in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he subsequently transferred back to his former unit with sufficient retainability for promotion; however, he was still not recommended for promotion. 2) His unit commander took him back on the basis that he would deploy and not be at the unit. However, since he was a member of the Air Force Reserve, the squadron commander of the unit he was assigned to (not the TDY commander) could have recommended him...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00062
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The certification of service provided by the applicant reflects he was a member of the Air National Guard (ANG) from 12 Apr 80 through 11 Apr 87 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: MI/TAG and MIANG/VC state the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to validate his request for service credit for active duty from 25 Sep 81 through 29 Jun 84. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03610
This time enclosed was a NGB 22, stating that he was discharged with 5 years and 11 days of service and that he was eligible for reenlistment into the Armed Forces. After reviewing the applicants discharge notification package, dated 22 Mar 06, it was validated that the member was recommended for discharge for failing to maintain contact with the unit to schedule a date to attend BMT or attend Unit Training Assembly (UTA) weekends, which constituted substandard performance on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03237
In support of his appeal the applicant provided a copy of the IG findings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. GREGORY A. PARKER Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2007-03237 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed from 6U (Air National Guard (ANG) Not Selected for Retention by the Commander) to 6A (ANG Eligible to Reenlist/Extend Selected by...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04612
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04612 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to medical continuation on extended active duty (EAD) from 1 October 2009 through 19 November 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends approval, stating,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-00173
NGB/A1PS reviewed the evidence provided and concurs with restoring 32 days of leave to her leave account. a. Twenty-five and one half (25.5) days of leave were added to her leave account commencing 31 January 2007 and at the time of her retirement from the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program on 1 February 2007, she was authorized to receive cash settlement for an additional 25.5 days of unused accrued annual leave. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.