RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00062
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect active duty service credit for 25
Sep 81 through 29 Jun 84.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His records do not reflect his active duty service from 25 Sep 81
through 29 Jun 84.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his
Certification of Military Service; copies of a letters from his
Senator, the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs (DVA), the
National Personnel Record Center (NPRC); and extracts from his
military personnel and medical records.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The certification of service provided by the applicant reflects he was
a member of the Air National Guard (ANG) from 12 Apr 80 through 11 Apr
87
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
MI/TAG and MIANG/VC state the applicant has not provided sufficient
documentation to validate his request for service credit for active
duty from 25 Sep 81 through 29 Jun 84.
The MI/TAG and MIANG/VC complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
NGB/A1PS concurs with MI/TAG and MIANG/VC that the applicant has not
provided sufficient documentation to support his request for credit
for active duty service. NGB/A1PS further states the
documentation required to support his request would be Leave and
Earnings Statements, completed travel vouchers, certified orders, the
NGB Form 22 and the DD Form 214.
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1PS recommends the request relief be denied. NGB/A1Ps states
they concur with the subject matter expert and the Michigan State
Headquarters that there is insufficient documentation in the
applicant’s application to validate his active duty service credit
claim.
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided copies
travel orders, training orders, memorandums, medical notes and leave
and earning statements from his military personnel records in support
of his application. His complete submission is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. The applicant is
requesting active duty service credit for the period 25 Sep 81 through
29 Jun 84. The Air Force office of primary responsibility reviewed
his request and determined that he did not provide documentation to
support his claim, and recommends denial of his request. In response,
the applicant provided copies of various orders, printouts from his
Air Force Finance and Accounting Center records, and documentation
extracted from his medical records. We carefully reviewed the
documentation submitted and while the documents appear to partially
validate his claim, absent the appropriate analysis from the subject
matter expert, we are unable to make a credible determination as to
its sufficiency for purposes of awarding service credit. Furthermore,
it appears that the relief he is seeking through the correction of
records process would be more appropriately addressed
administratively. Accordingly, the AFBCMR staff has forwarded a copy
of the documentation provided by the applicant to the Air Force
Reserve Center for action. After their review, should the applicant
not be satisfied with the administrative relief, he may then petition
the Board.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00062 in Executive Session on 27 Feb 08, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Ms. Dee R. Reardon, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 1 Jan 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 19 Dec 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 15 Jan 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jan 08.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Response dated 13 Feb 08.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02887
She missed the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Captain Promotion Board, and had to wait until May 07, to meet the FY08 Captain Promotion Board, where she was selected for promotion. She entered the ANG on 3 Aug 06, as a first lieutenant and was promoted to the grade of captain by the FY08 Captains Promotion Board effective 1 Oct 07. Therefore, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopts its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05912
In addition, the Department of Defense Inspector General (IG DoD/MRI) concurred with the determination, approved the report, and substantiated the allegations (Exhibit B). We note that based on the Report of Investigation (ROI) from the SAF/IG the applicant was the victim of reprisal under the Whistleblower Protection Act (10 USC 1034) by his former commander who denied his reenlistment and attendance at the Chief Executive Course (CEC). Other than the comments in the ROI, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02176
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal statement; copies of his active duty orders; DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, ending 13 Sep 07 and 3 Sep 10, respectively; AF IMTs 348, Line of Duty Determination, and other supporting documents from his military personnel and servicemember medical records. EXAMINER NOTE: The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation and provided the required AF Form 469 and copies of AF Forms 422 and A1PS...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02900
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial of the applicants request for promotion to Master Sergeant, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ANGI 36-2502, Promotion of Airman, states Prior to promotion to any...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03831
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 102.06 113.00 135.00 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-03831 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted from 19 Apr 73 to 22 Feb 78 by allowing him to resign his US Air Force Reserve (USAFR) commission on 30 Jun 79 and reappointing him on 4 May 84, thereby...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00313
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of the Resolution Agreement and Release of Claim and her senior master sergeant (E-8) promotion order. The agreement indicates the Nevada Military Department will place her in an AGR position in the Joint Force Headquarters; recommend her for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant (E-8), provided she is otherwise qualified; and support her AFBCMR request for retroactive promotion to a date as early as 23 Dec 05. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00685
On 3 Aug 10, the Vice Chief of Joint Staff signed an order amending the applicants separation from the ANG and transfer to the Air Force Reserve to reflect his discharge from the WYANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force effective 10 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 2.25.2, ANG Unique Separations. In addition, no one had the authority to discharge the applicant from the Reserve of the Air Force (See SAF/IG Report at Exhibit B). According to AFI 36-3209, the authority to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02604 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the periods 29 Jul 09 to 28 Jan 10, 29 Jan 10 to 28 Jul 10, and 29 Jul 10 to 28 Jan 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02809
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02809 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect one year of satisfactory service for the period of 30 Jan 83 through 14 Jan 84. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His service record no longer...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01157
On 18 May 2011, NGB/A1PS found the applicant medically disqualified for worldwide duty for sleep apnea and requested a fitness evaluation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPA recommends denial of the applicants request for a medical retirement. Furthermore, the applicant was diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in 2010 by the DVA but there is no documentation to support any service connected aggravation.