Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03080
Original file (BC-2010-03080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03080 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect that he made a 
timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component 
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The paperwork was sent in and supposedly corrected by a staff sergeant 
in the Air National Guard (ANG) in N. Kingstown, RI. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of the 
servicemember’s death certificate, marriage certificate, Reserve Order 
Number EL-3521, DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel; 
and a letter from the Rhode Island ANG. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 7 January 1991, the deceased member was notified of his eligibility 
to participate in the RCSBP. He elected Option C, “Immediate Annuity 
for Children.” He was not married at the time of his election. On 8 
August 1993, the deceased member and the applicant were married. The 
deceased member did not request to change his RCSBP coverage within 
one year of his marriage as required by Title 10, USC Section 1448. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP states there is no record reflecting 
the deceased member made an RCSBP election until 20 November 1997. 
He passed away on 16 May 2009. The deceased member did not request to 
change his RCSBP coverage within one year of his marriage as required 
by law. However, because he was eligible for retired pay at age 60, 


the applicant is eligible for an ID card, as well as base exchange and 
commissary privileges. In addition, she is eligible to apply for 
medical and dental benefits through the TRICARE program. 

 

The applicant states that ARPC received the request from the deceased 
member to update his records to reflect their marriage; however, ARPC 
informed him the notification was made past the one year by law 
requirement. 

 

The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 8 October 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law 
or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the 
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; 
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting his request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2010-03080 in Executive Session on 21 April 2011, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603: 

 

Panel Chair 


Member 

Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Aug 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 1 Oct 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01076

    Original file (BC-2007-01076.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She retired in June 2004 and noticed she had been given several RCSBP election options that her now deceased spouse would have had but did not. She contends her spouse should have had the same paperwork at his retirement. She notes her husband was retired prior to his death and should have been given the same options all other retired members receive; such as an opportunity to update his election.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02619

    Original file (BC-2010-02619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased spouse’s record be changed to show she elected spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035

    Original file (BC-2007-00035.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01955

    Original file (BC-2010-01955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” The servicemember was not married at the time of his election, as he divorced in January 2001. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02877

    Original file (BC-2010-02877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, because the former member did not take action to ensure the Air Force personnel system was updated, the Legal Advisor does not find it appropriate to charge the former member’s negligence against the applicant by denying coverage which Congress intended....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02505

    Original file (BC-2009-02505.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP notes the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, reflects the servicemember elected Option A, decline to make an election until age 60. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s deceased husband, upon notification of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, originally elected Option A under the RCSBP thereby electing not to make a decision regarding coverage for the applicant until he reached age 60. The evidence of record does show the deceased service member requested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00269

    Original file (BC-2008-00269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends the requested relief be denied. ARPC/DPP states the applicant is ineligible to make an election for spouse coverage under the SBP because his request was received after the one year time requirement. ARPC/DPP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03576

    Original file (BC 2007 03576.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He elected RCSBP for the applicant. If the member loses his spouse by death or divorce, he has one year to effect a change in his election. When the former member filled out his application for retired pay he did not change his election to former spouse.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00898

    Original file (BC-2010-00898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends the applicant and former spouse return to civil court to have paragraph 7 of the DRQO SBP language changed due to the statute requiring the SBP award be expressed as either maximum coverage or a specific base amount...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02261

    Original file (BC-2010-02261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was not informed that she could change her election when she got married in 2002. In addition, the applicant indicates that she was not aware she had the option of changing her election upon her marriage or of the open season; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence to show she did not have enough information available to her to make an informed decision. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...