Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00898
Original file (BC-2010-00898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00898 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for 
former spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor 
Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His records reflect his current spouse as his RCSBP beneficiary 
and it should reflect his former spouse. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of DD 
Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement For 
Former Souse Coverage, DD Form 2293, Application For Former 
Spouse Payments From Retired Pay, his marriage license, Domestic 
Relation Order. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant was married when he was notified of his eligibility 
to participate in the RCSBP on 11 Jul 95. He failed to make an 
election at that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, 
Decline to make an election until age 60. The parties were 
divorced on 7 May 04. A Domestic Relations Qualifying Order 
(DRQO) filed on 3 Apr 05 deemed the applicant’s former spouse as 
the beneficiary for the RCSBP. The order was submitted and 
received by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 
within the one year period required by law. DFAS notified the 
former spouse that they should return to court to have the level 
of coverage changed on the DRQO because statute requires the 
language to be expressed as either maximum coverage or a specific 
dollar amount and not less than $300.00. 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPP recommends the applicant and former spouse return to 
civil court to have paragraph 7 of the DRQO SBP language changed 
due to the statute requiring the SBP award be expressed as either 
maximum coverage or a specific base amount in a dollar amount not 
less than $300.00. The SBP monthly annuity payment at any point 
in time is determined by multiplying the designated SBP base 
amount by 55 percent. DPP notes once this has been accomplished, 
the applicant should forward the information to DFAS to ensure 
that the former spouse information will be on file. 

 

The complete ARPC/DPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 2 Jul 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as 
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to 
sustain his burden of proof of the existence of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00898 in Executive Session on 5 Oct 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 16 Jun 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01494

    Original file (BC-2010-01494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the applicant’s records be corrected to show at the time of his retirement, he elected SBP coverage for his spouse and children, with a reduced base amount of $2365.00, and that his SBP election be changed to former spouse coverage, effective 1 Oct 07. The deemed election was not processed because the applicant’s SBP election indicated that he declined coverage (at the time of his active duty retirement). The former spouse is not entitled to SBP coverage based on the original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02611

    Original file (BC-2010-02611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Since the applicant has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances existed that would override the failure of she and her former husband to effect the former spouse coverage, based on the legal guidance the Board has been given, we can only grant the relief sought if the member’s current spouse provides notarized consent relinquishing the benefit. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02692

    Original file (BC-2006-02692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the former spouse did provide a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS, the paperwork that was filed by the former spouse was for former spouse benefits through the member’s Federal civilian retirement plan and not his military retirement. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 April 1997, he elected full and immediate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862

    Original file (BC-2012-01862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01718

    Original file (BC 2012 01718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states the member and/or his former spouse had one year from the date of the QDRO, dated 9 Oct 01, to make a former spouse deemed election to the Secretary concerned. He states the QDRO does not provide the required “election data” necessary to complete the SBP enrollment form. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02922

    Original file (BC-2002-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, the majority of the Board is not persuaded that deceased member’s records should be altered so that she would receive an SBP annuity. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. A majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00269

    Original file (BC-2008-00269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends the requested relief be denied. ARPC/DPP states the applicant is ineligible to make an election for spouse coverage under the SBP because his request was received after the one year time requirement. ARPC/DPP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03261

    Original file (BC-2006-03261.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His father always sent his mother half of his retirement checks on time while he was alive. DPP states the court awarded former spouse coverage under the RCSBP program; however, the member did not notify this office of his marital status changes nor did his former spouse deem an election within a year as required by law. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03146

    Original file (BC-2008-03146.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” In 1995, the applicant was divorced from his former spouse and during an open enrollment in 1999 through 2000, he elected to participate with an election of Option CJ, “immediate annuity for child only.” In 2002, he was married to his current spouse. He would like his current spouse listed as the beneficiary under RCSBP. He completed all the required paperwork at that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01922

    Original file (BC-2003-01922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01922 INDEX CODE: 137.00, 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse and child as his beneficiaries for his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant’s 28 September 1997 RCSBP Election Certificate reflects his...