Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02965
Original file (BC-2010-02965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02965 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star 
Medal (BSM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) instead 
of the BSM when left Vietnam. He was told he did not receive 
the BSM because he was not a sergeant. 

 

His commanding officer and supervisor attempted to get him 
promoted from July 1969 until the time he left Vietnam. He had 
the time in grade and was qualified; however, the promotion kept 
getting put off and his records were destroyed in an attack. He 
did not get his promotion until his next duty station. 

 

He believes granting him the BSM it is the right thing to do. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of 
extracts from his master personnel records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The available records reflect the applicant served on active 
duty from 6 Jul 67 to 2 Jul 71. He was credited with 3 years, 
11 months and 27 days of active service and one year of Foreign 
and/or Sea Service. 

 


 

The BSM is awarded to a person in any branch of the military 
service who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces 
of the United States on or after 7 Dec 44, shall have 
distinguished himself by heroic or meritorious achievement or 
service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in 
connection with military operations against an armed enemy. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states they were 
unable to locate official documentation verifying the applicant 
is entitled to the BSM. 

 

DPSIDR states any recommendation for decorations, including the 
BSM, is submitted on an individual basis and is a voluntary act 
on the part of the recommending official. Under the 1996 
National Defense Authorization Act, veterans may be recommended 
for a decoration by following these procedures. However, the 
written decoration recommendation must meet two criteria: 1) be 
made by someone, other than the member himself, in the member’s 
chain of command at the time of the incident, and, who has 
firsthand knowledge of the acts or achievements; and 2) be 
submitted through a congressional member who can ask a military 
service to review a proposal for a decoration based on the 
merits of the proposal and the award criteria in existence when 
the event occurred. The decoration must include the name of the 
decoration, i.e., BSM, reason for recognition (heroism, 
achievement, or meritorious service), inclusive dates of the 
act, and a narrative description of the act. The recommending 
official must sign the recommendation. Also, a proposed 
citation is required and any chain of command endorsements (at 
the time of the act or service) are required. Any statements 
from fellow comrades, eyewitness statements attesting to the 
act, sworn affidavits, and other documentation substantiating 
the recommendation should be included in the package. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

His AFCM citation shows it was for meritorious service, which is 
a qualification for the BSM. His performance reports show he 
was qualified for the grade of sergeant. He believes someone 
did not do their job at the time and since it has been 40 years, 
he cannot meet two of the criterion listed by HQ AFPC/DPSIDR. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case, to include his response to the Air Force evaluation; 
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2010-02965 in Executive Session on 12 April 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 30 Nov 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Dec 10. 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00645

    Original file (BC-2008-00645.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00645 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) in lieu of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) awarded him on 20 Aug 90. DPSIDR notes they were unable to locate the recommendation for award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02399

    Original file (BC-2007-02399.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also recognizes single acts of merit or meritorious service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit; but such service must have been accomplished with distinction. The timeline for submitting a decoration is two years from the date of the act or achievement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04235

    Original file (BC-2011-04235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s entitlement to the Meritorious...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01587

    Original file (BC-2010-01587.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Everyone received a medal but him. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Additionally, the applicant cannot recommend himself for entitlement to a decoration.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137

    Original file (BC-2007-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02624

    Original file (BC 2014 02624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it is noted the applicant’s AF IMT 3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations, dated , does not mention the BSM, and the applicant does not have a recommendation for upgrade from someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement, preferably from someone within his chain of command at the time of the act/achievement, a proposed citation, or eyewitness statements, AFPC/DPSIDR believed based on the MSM recommendation package the applicant's actions were at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00845

    Original file (BC-2007-00845.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His supervisor told him immediately after the attack that he was recommending him for the BSM and mentioned it again when he signed his performance report. The complete DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 14 May 07, the applicant states he was never awarded or aware that he had received the AFCM for his services in Vietnam. Other than his own...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00918

    Original file (BC 2009 00918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00918 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 March 1958, have distinguished themselves by meritorious achievement and service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01359

    Original file (BC 2014 01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 Mar 58, distinguished themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service. The original award approval authority determined the AFCM was the appropriate award to recognize the applicant's outstanding achievement on 22 Mar 75. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00484

    Original file (BC-2010-00484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00484 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records...