RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01711
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
SRP) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was mistreated by his chain of command and cheated out of his
military career.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter from
his former commander and documents extracted from his military
personnel records.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 1 June 2004.
AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated
29 October 2007 reflects the applicants supervisor non-
recommended him for reenlistment and his commander denied him
reenlistment eligibility.
On 31 May 2008, the applicant was honorably discharged in the
grade of senior airman under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Completion of Required Active Service. He served 4 years on
active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicants
supervisor non-recommended and his commander denied him
reenlistment eligibility on 29 October 2007. The supervisors
justification is in block II and the commanders reasons are in
block III of the AF IMT 418. Specifics include 8 Memorandums for
Record, 3 Letters of Counseling, and 2 Letters of Reprimand for
substandard performance, significant supervisory involvement, and
almost constant oversight.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have
selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable
Information from any substantiated source, the airmans
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the
airmans ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty
performance levels. Although the appeal area on the back of the
AF Form 418 in the applicants record was not completed, he
stated he appealed and the appeal was denied. According to the
copy of his appeal included with his DD Form 149, the wing
commander disapproved his appeal.
Applicant submitted several character references to include a
current and old letter from his December 2004 July 2007
commander; the letters have the same information. His old
commander raves about applicants willingness to support or
represent the squadron by volunteering and referring to him as
the spirit of the squadron, but he does not comment on his duty
performance. Applicants performance report closing out 1 March
2006 and signed by the same commander has applicant identified as
Consider versus Ready or Immediate Promotion.
Additionally, the front of the report has the applicant marked
one block above failing or unacceptable for 5 out of 7 ratings.
Although these are acceptable ratings, they are not indicative of
members who normally garner such praise as in the character
statement to include the words dedicated and committed.
The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 9 July 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air
Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a
change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted.
Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01711 in Executive Session on 10 November 2010,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01711 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 April 2010, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Record.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 24 June 2010.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 9 July 2010.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01993
On 12 February 2007, the applicant's supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01132
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 1 March 2006, the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01139
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01139 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of “2X” which denotes "First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP" be upgraded to a “1” series reentry code (Fully qualified for enlistment). ...