Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01711
Original file (BC-2010-01711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01711 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the 
SRP) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was mistreated by his chain of command and cheated out of his 
military career. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter from 
his former commander and documents extracted from his military 
personnel records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 1 June 2004. 

 

AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 
29 October 2007 reflects the applicant’s supervisor non-
recommended him for reenlistment and his commander denied him 
reenlistment eligibility. 

 

On 31 May 2008, the applicant was honorably discharged in the 
grade of senior airman under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, 
Completion of Required Active Service. He served 4 years on 
active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant’s 
supervisor non-recommended and his commander denied him 
reenlistment eligibility on 29 October 2007. The supervisor’s 
justification is in block II and the commanders reasons are in 
block III of the AF IMT 418. Specifics include 8 Memorandums for 
Record, 3 Letters of Counseling, and 2 Letters of Reprimand for 
substandard performance, significant supervisory involvement, and 
almost constant oversight. 

 

AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have 
selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The 
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the member’s 
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable 
Information from any substantiated source, the airman’s 
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the 
airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty 
performance levels. Although the appeal area on the back of the 
AF Form 418 in the applicant’s record was not completed, he 
stated he appealed and the appeal was denied. According to the 
copy of his appeal included with his DD Form 149, the wing 
commander disapproved his appeal. 

 

Applicant submitted several character references to include a 
current and old letter from his December 2004 – July 2007 
commander; the letters have the same information. His old 
commander raves about applicant’s willingness to support or 
represent the squadron by volunteering and referring to him as 
the spirit of the squadron, but he does not comment on his duty 
performance. Applicant’s performance report closing out 1 March 
2006 and signed by the same commander has applicant identified as 
“Consider” versus “Ready” or “Immediate Promotion.” 
Additionally, the front of the report has the applicant marked 
one block above failing or unacceptable for 5 out of 7 ratings. 
Although these are acceptable ratings, they are not indicative of 
members who normally garner such praise as in the character 
statement to include the words dedicated and committed. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 9 July 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D). As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that 
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air 
Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not 
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a 
change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted. 
Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01711 in Executive Session on 10 November 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01711 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 April 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 24 June 2010. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 9 July 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103

    Original file (BC 2014 01103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193

    Original file (BC-2012-00193.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111

    Original file (BC 2014 02111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning “1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment,” be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892

    Original file (BC 2012 05892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876

    Original file (BC-2011-03876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01993

    Original file (BC-2008-01993.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 February 2007, the applicant's supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01132

    Original file (BC-2011-01132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 1 March 2006, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01139

    Original file (BC-2008-01139.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01139 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of “2X” which denotes "First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP" be upgraded to a “1” series reentry code (Fully qualified for enlistment). ...