Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00982
Original file (BC-2010-00982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00982 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The decedent’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely 
election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit 
Plan (SBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Their divorce decree awarded her beneficiary to the SBP. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her 
divorce decree, the decedent’s death certificate and his DD Form 
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 7 Nov 78, the service member contracted his initial enlistment 
in the Regular Air Force. He served as an Aerospace Ground 
Equipment Craftsman. He retired on 1 Dec 98. He served 
20 years, and 24 days of active service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIAR states that based on guidance issued by the AFBCMR 
they forwarded this application without a recommendation because 
it involves two potential SBP beneficiaries. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

The SAF/MRB Legal Advisor recommends denial. The Legal Advisor 
states that despite the court order directing the member to 
convert to former spouse coverage, federal law makes the election 


unavailable when the deemed election is not timely effected. If 
there were not a competing eligible beneficiary, or there was 
notarized consent of the current spouse, he would recommend 
correcting the record, but there is a competing spouse and no 
consent. He sees no extraordinary circumstances that would 
support not enforcing the deemed election requirement given the 
fact correcting the record in this manner will deprive the 
current spouse of benefits to which she is legally entitled. 

 

The complete SAF/MRB Legal Advisor’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 23 Jun 10, for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion of the 
SAF/MRB Legal Advisor and adopt his rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her 
burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00982 in Executive Session on 14 Sep 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 10 May 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 21 Jun 10, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Jun 10, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02192

    Original file (BC-2011-02192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02192 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________ __ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The service member elected spouse only coverage under the SBP at full retirement pay. Since the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04680

    Original file (BC-2010-04680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her divorce decree lists her as the SBP beneficiary to receive the former member’s SBP benefits. While we do not take issue with the applicant’s assertion that her divorce decree ordered her former husband to continue coverage for her under SBP, he failed to convert the coverage to former spouse coverage within one year of their divorce as required by law. Since the applicant has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances existed that would override the failure of she and her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04295

    Original file (BC-2010-04295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR did not provide a recommendation. The complete AFRBA Legal Advisor...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03013

    Original file (BC-2010-03013.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence the service member or the applicant submitted a request for former spouse coverage within one year following their divorce. The complete SAF/MRB Legal Advisor evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant requests the Board honor the divorce decree that deemed her the beneficiary under the SBP. While we do not take issue with the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01572

    Original file (BC-2012-01572.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband paid SBP premiums for his former spouse’s SBP coverage from January 1996 to June 2004, even though the former spouse remarried in September 2003 before her 55th birthday. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 15 Nov 12, Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Dec 12, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00093

    Original file (BC-2010-00093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force, her former husband designated her as the beneficiary to receive all final payments and monies owned him upon his death. The complete BCMR Legal Advisor’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the BCMR Legal Advisor’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02121

    Original file (BC-2011-02121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAF/MRB Legal Advisor’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the current spouse of her deceased former spouse never spent a day with him during his military career but is reaping the benefits that she earned. She is being denied SBP because of a mistake DFAS and the Air Force has made by not upholding Air Force regulation (if you are married to a military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02010

    Original file (BC-2009-02010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence the member submitted a valid former spouse election within one year following their divorce. The Legal Advisor states the widow became the SBP beneficiary by operation of law when the member died in Jun 05 and is currently receiving SBP payments. We note the opinion and recommendation of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor that as an operation of law the member’s spouse is the legal beneficiary unless a legally effective election or deemed election (pursuant to a court order)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02857

    Original file (BC-2010-02857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither party submitted a valid election change during the required time limit following their divorce. The complete SAF/MRB Legal Advisor’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel states that paragraph 13; page 20 of the divorce decree shows the deceased member acknowledged his obligation by submitting this as an election for SBP for his spouse. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062

    Original file (BC-2011-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicant’s coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...