RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00733
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that:
a. He was permanently retired with a 30 percent
compensable disability rating, rather than transferred to the
temporary disability retired list (TDRL) with a 50 percent
compensable disability rating.
b. He was retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-
5), instead of major (O-4).
2. He be provided documentation pertaining to his selection for
promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (administratively
resolved).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His DD Form 214 reflects he was transferred to the TDRL with a
50 percent disability rating; however, it should reflect his
subsequent removal from the TDRL and permanent retirement with a
30 percent disability rating. Also, he should have been retired
in the grade of lieutenant colonel as he was selected for
promotion to the requested grade prior to this transfer to the
TDRL.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
AFMPC Forms 134, Retirement Order.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Air Force in the grade of major (O-
4), effective and with a date of rank of 13 Aug 72. On 21 Jun
77, he was transferred to the TDRL with a 50 percent compensable
disability rating. On 31 Dec 78, he was permanently retired for
physical disability, with a 30 percent compensable disability
rating.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and D.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOO makes no recommendation, but defers to the Disability
Operations Section in determining the applicants retired grade.
The applicant met and was selected for promotion to lieutenant
colonel by the calendar year 1976 (CY76) Temporary Lieutenant
Colonel Promotion Board. The list was confirmed by the Senate
on 26 Jan 77. A review of the sequence roster from the board
reveals that his promotion was withheld on 23 Feb 77. There is
no documentation to indicate he was recommended for promotion or
the withhold action was terminated prior to his separation. Had
the action been terminated, he would have been promoted on 1 Mar
77. He was transferred to the TDRL on 1 Jun 77.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSD defers to the Board to determine if there was an error
or injustice with respect to the applicants retired grade.
There is no documentation in his records indicating the withhold
action was terminated prior to his separation. As such, his
DD Form 214 correctly reflects Major (P) as the rank the
applicant held on active duty at the time of his separation.
However, Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1372
states,
any member whose name is placed on the temporary
disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205, is entitled
to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:
(4) The
temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not
been for the physical disability for which he was retired. As
for his request related to correcting his DD Form 214 to
indicate he was ultimately permanently retired with a 30 percent
disability rating, there is no evidence of an error or
injustice. The applicant was released from active service and
placed on the TDRL on 21 Jun 77 for acute schizophrenic episode,
with a definite impairment of social and industrial
adaptability, with a disability rating of 50 percent. He had
his first mandatory TDRL re-evaluation on 19 Jul 78 and the
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended his
removal from the TDRL and permanent retirement with a disability
rating of 30 percent. He was removed from the TDRL and
permanently retired on 31 Dec 78 and was credited with 18 years,
10 months, and 8 days of total active service. He received a DD
Form 214 when he was placed on the TDRL. When a member is
removed from the TDRL, a new DD Form 214 is not issued.
Instead, a new order is published indicating the final status
and becomes a permanent part of the military personnel record
which can be attached to the DD Form 214 to reflect the final
disposition of permanent retirement.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Jan 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. In regards
to the applicants request to correct his DD Form 214 to reflect
his permanent disability retirement with a combined disability
rating of 30 percent, we note that a DD Form 214 documents only
periods of active duty service. In addition, periods on the
TDRL are not considered active service. As such, issuance of a
DD Form 214 when an individual is removed from the TDRL and
permanently retired is not authorized. Instead, the new
retirement order is published indicating the final status and
becomes a permanent part of the military personnel record which
can be attached to the DD Form 214 to reflect the final
disposition of permanent retirement. In regards to his request
that his record be corrected to reflect he was retired in the
grade of lieutenant colonel, we are not convinced by the
evidence presented that he was the victim of a error or
injustice. While the evidence of record indicates he was
selected for promotion to the temporary grade of lieutenant
colonel prior to being transferred to the Temporary Disability
Retired List (TDRL), and 10 USC 1372 provides that any member
placed on the TDRL is entitled to the temporary grade to which
he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical
disability for which he was retired, the applicant has provided
no evidence which would lead us to believe the underlying basis
for the action to withhold his promotion was somehow
insufficient, was withdrawn, or that his commanders abused their
discretionary authority. We note there is no documentation in
the record describing the circumstances surrounding the withhold
action; however, based on the presumption of regularity in the
conduct of governmental affairs, we must assume the withhold
action was proper and carried out in compliance with the
directive under which it was effected. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00733 in Executive Session on 14 Jul 11, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00733 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Feb 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 9 Dec 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 17 Dec 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jan 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01299
He was progressively promoted to the grade of captain effective 26 June 1985. Once a member is placed on the TDRL, they are in a retired status and are not eligible to meet a promotion board. DPSOO states that no evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02077
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was not selected for Regular Air Force (RegAF) by the Fiscal Year 66 (FY66), FY68 and FY70 Regular Air Force Selection Boards. DPSOO opines a direct promotion would be unfair to other officers who were not selected for Regular Air Force and required to retire at the 20 year point without being able to meet a lieutenant colonel promotion board. Accordingly, we conclude that it would not be in...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01126
The PEB determined the applicant would be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a disability rating of 40 percent. AFPC/DPSD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that Title 37 reflects time spent on the TDRL could be counted as creditable service. Regarding his argument that the DoD disability instruction authorizes credit towards...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03391
If the applicant’s medical board had been worked under the normal process rather than as a possible imminent death, she would have received a total of 40 additional days-20 days of PTDY and 20 days of outprocessing time. However, these additional days would not have provided her with 20 years of active service at the time of her separation date. AFPC/DPSD's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04590
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04590 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 20 percent disability rating he received for his diabetes be increased to 40 percent and he be medically retired with a 40 percent disability rating. The USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the service members condition at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02719
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02719 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His permanent compensable disability rating of 30 percent should be increased to 50 percent and made retroactive to his retirement date. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03623 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for 20 years of active service toward retirement. He believes because of this injustice he should be credited with the 45 days of service in order to qualify for the Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP). No provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01117
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and discharge with entitlement to disability severance pay, effective 8 September 2010, be changed to a permanent retirement with a minimum 40 percent disability rating. The DPSD complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04632
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04632 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating from the Air Force of 10 percent be increased to 30 percent and he receive a permanent retirement. Had the DVA initially evaluated him at 30 percent or if the FPEB waited until the DVA processed his appeal, the increased...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01236
Amendment SO ACD-00565, dated 26 January 2007 pertaining to applicant's placement on the temporary retired file, effective 20 January 2007 reflects he retired in the projected higher grade of SSgt. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...