Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00595
Original file (BC-2010-00595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00595 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His record be corrected to reflect that he served in Pakistan. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served in Pakistan and in Afghanistan; however, his record 
only reflects his time in Afghanistan, not Pakistan. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, issued in conjunction with his 17 Apr 03 separation and a 
copy of his orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM 
(OEF). 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant, while serving as a member of the Oregon Air 
National Guard, was recalled to extended active duty in support 
of OEF. He completed 1 year, 6 months, and 17 days of active 
duty, including 2 months and 28 days of foreign service during 
this period. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPSVT recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the 
available information, they were unable to verify the 
applicant’s service in Pakistan. They contacted the applicant 
telephonically, on 8 Mar 10, and requested that he provide a 
copy of his travel vouchers to Pakistan. This was followed up 
with a letter, on 22 Mar 10, with the same request. However, he 
did not respond. 

 

The complete ARPC/DPSVT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 


 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 12 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00595 in Executive Session on 6 January 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Feb 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSVT, dated 3 May 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02289

    Original file (BC-2010-02289.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02289 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02995

    Original file (BC-2010-02995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. to verify his deployment, the Board would reconsider his request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01232

    Original file (BC-2010-01232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01232 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be reissued to incorporate multiple active duty tours from 22 Jun 71 through 21 Dec 71. On 30 Nov 06, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04003

    Original file (BC 2013 04003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition to being the 455th Expeditionary Operations Group (EOG) Commander, he was the A-10A flight leader and expended live ammunition in direct support of the 82nd Airborne Division and U.S. Army Special Operations units. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSID recommends the request be denied and that the applicant submit for a one-time reconsideration of the CAM to USAFCENT in order to exhaust the available administrative remedies....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02888

    Original file (BC-2010-02888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02888 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with foreign service for serving in Germany and Japan. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03190

    Original file (BC-2010-03190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    D. Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). On 23 May 2011, ARPC/DPTSA advised the applicant that he is authorized the following medals and ribbons: Joint Service Achievement Medal, Air Force Good Conduct, Army Service Ribbon w/one device, Air Reserve Meritorious Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Air Force Longevity Medal w/three devices, Air Force Reserve Medal w/M device, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon w/one Silver Star and one Bronze Star,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02667

    Original file (BC 2010 02667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his three active duty tours of more than 90 days each in order for him to be eligible for Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. The DPSVT complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05099

    Original file (BC 2013 05099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not awarded the ACM for the time he served in Pakistan in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01110

    Original file (BC-2010-01110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01110 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His National Archives (NA) Form 13038, Certificate of Military Service, be changed to indicate his active duty service was for other than training purposes. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04346

    Original file (BC-2010-04346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04346 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to include award of the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) and the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). DPSIDR states that his request for entitlement to the AFCAM has...