Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03190
Original file (BC-2010-03190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03190 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. Add the following awards to his DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release from Active Duty: 

 

 A. He be awarded the Joint Service Achievement Medal – administratively corrected. 

 

 B. Navy Achievement Medal - administratively corrected. 

 

 C. Global War on Terrorism Medal - administratively 
corrected. 

 

 D. Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). 

 

 

2. Amend the following items to his DD Form 214: 

 

 A. Army Good Conduct Medal. 

 

 B. Navy Sea Service Deployment Ribbon should reflect one (1) 
Silver Star – administratively corrected. 

 

 C. Navy Expert Pistol should read Navy Sharp Shooter, not 
expert. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He believes he is entitled to the contested awards. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and documents extracted from his military personnel 
records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force Air National 
Guard on 22 September 2001. 

 

On 14 July 2003, the applicant was honorably released from active 
duty and transferred to the Air National Guard. He served 
1 year, 9 months and 23 days on active duty. He was credited 
with 10 years, 2 months, and 3 days of prior active service. 

 

On 23 May 2011, ARPC/DPTSA advised the applicant that he is 
authorized the following medals and ribbons: Joint Service 
Achievement Medal, Air Force Good Conduct, Army Service Ribbon 
w/one device, Air Reserve Meritorious Service Medal, National 
Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Air 
Force Longevity Medal w/three devices, Air Force Reserve Medal 
w/M device, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon w/one Silver Star and 
one Bronze Star, Navy Achievement Medal, Navy Expert Pistol Medal 
(E), Navy Expert Rifle Medal, and the Navy Good Conduct. 

 

On 20 June 2011, ARPC/DPTS advised the applicant that they 
updated his Longevity Service Award to three Oak Leaf Clusters 
and added the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal basic. Also, 
updated the Navy Achievement Medal and the Joint Service 
Achievement Medal as well as changed the devices on his Sea 
Service Ribbon to reflect one Silver Star and one Bronze Star. 

They were unable to verify the applicant completed three 
satisfactory years of service in the Army; therefore, unable to 
update the Army Good Conduct Medal. Also, there is no conversion 
for the “E” sharpshooter - the closest the Air Force has is the 
Expert Pistol. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPSVT recommends denial of the AFAM. DPSVT states on 
15 September 2010 and on 28 September 2010, the applicant was 
contacted by DPSVT via email to provide copies of orders and or a 
citation of the AFAM in order to review his request. DPSVT has 
not received any supporting documentation from the applicant as 
requested. 

 

The DPSVT complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 12 November 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s 
contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the 
available evidence of record we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which entitles him 
to award of the AFAM and the Army Good Conduct Medal. In regard 
to the applicant’s request to have his DD Form 214 amended to 
read “Navy Sharp Shooter” rather than “Navy Expert Pistol Medal,” 
as stated in the ARPC/DPTS letter dated 20 June 2011, there is no 
conversion for the sharpshooter. Therefore, other than the 
administrative corrections made to his record, we find no basis 
to recommend granting any additional relief. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03190 in Executive Session on 8 September 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03190 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 August 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPSVT, dated 27 October 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 November 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc 2013 02373

    Original file (bc 2013 02373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded several ribbons/devices for his time on active duty and in the Air Force Reserves. DoD 1348-33, Volume 2, Manual of Military Decorations and Awards: DoD Service Awards - Campaign, Expeditionary, and Service Medals states the following: HSM may be awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who, subsequent to 1 Apr 75, distinguished themselves as individuals or as members of U.S. military units or ships, by meritorious, direct participation in a significant military act, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01993

    Original file (BC-2003-01993.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01993 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) with one bronze service star, the Rifle (Marksman) Ribbon, Pistol (Marksman) Ribbon, and the Hand Grenade (Sharpshooter) Ribbon. They further indicated that if he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00108

    Original file (BC-2006-00108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), Air Force Training Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA), NCO Professional Military Education Ribbon, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship ribbon (SAEMR) with device, Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) with two devices, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014884

    Original file (20140014884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03154

    Original file (BC-2011-03154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the SAEMR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000426

    Original file (20100000426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 November 2006, the Military Awards Branch issued a DD Form 215 correcting the applicant's 2004 DD Form 214 by adding to item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges), the Combat Action Badge, Iraq Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Navy Unit Commendation Medal. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) provides the following; a. completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) in 2000; b. completion of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00688

    Original file (BC 2014 00688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vermont Commendation Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00315

    Original file (bc-2013-00315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, does not reflect his AFOR and his AFAM. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of the applicant’s requests that his record be corrected to reflect two overseas tours of active duty covering the periods of 20 Sep 1988 to 12 Feb 1990 and 15 Oct 1990 to 14 Mar 1991 and that he be entitled to the AFOR. Moreover, on 20 Mar 2013, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01323

    Original file (BC-2004-01323.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01323 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he received three Air Force Achievement Medals (AFAMs) and the Air Force Longevity Service Award. His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the AFAM, Air Force Training Ribbon, Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018761

    Original file (20130018761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show - * his period of foreign service as 1 year, 6 months, and 8 days * award of the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * correction of the entry for the Armed Forces Reserve Medal to show it with a silver hourglass * correction of his Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal to show it as a fifth award * conversion of his Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal to the Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars 2....