Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00552
Original file (BC-2010-00552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00552 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to withdraw his participation in the Reserve 
Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was unable to complete the form for his SBP election in the 
90 day time frame. Due to his wife’s illness, he was not able to 
have her signature witnessed by a notary public. The form was 
completed with option “A” as soon he was able to do so. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate in 
the RCSBP in 2008. He made no election during that time and was 
automatically enrolled in Option C, immediate annuity for spouse 
and children. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP states the RCSBP package that 
was sent to the applicant clearly explained that if the election 
form was not received or postmarked within 90 calendar days of 
receipt of the package, then the applicant will be considered to 
have made an election. A cover letter was provided with contact 
phone numbers for the applicant to call with any questions, or 
concerns. 

 

 

 

 


Discontinuing the RCSBP program does not stop the Reserve 
Component portion of the plan. The Reserve portion is for 
coverage before age 60 should the applicant become deceased 
before collecting retired pay at age 60. The reduction in 
retired pay is calculated so that the premiums for the RCSBP 
coverage are paid over the course of the applicant’s lifetime as 
actuarially projected. 

 

The DPP complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 24 March 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00552 in Executive Session on 21 September 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00552 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 January 2010, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 17 March 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 March 2010. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02262

    Original file (BC-2010-02262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states the applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP via a certified letter dated 18 Jul 97; however, their records show the applicant did not make an election at that time; therefore, he was automatically enrolled in option A, “Deferred to make an election until age 60.” During an open-enrollment period from 1 Mar 99 through 29 Feb 00, the applicant requested information on the RCSBP. However, discontinuing the RCSBP program does not stop the Reserve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01142

    Original file (BC 2009 01142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends denial, noting, in part, the election made in the initial RCSBP package states an election made is “irrevocable,” except for a life changing event that is reported within one year of that event. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01142

    Original file (BC-2009-01142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends denial, noting, in part, the election made in the initial RCSBP package states an election made is “irrevocable,” except for a life changing event that is reported within one year of that event. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978

    Original file (BC-2007-00978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03489

    Original file (BC-2005-03489.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that her DFAS-CL 7220/48, Retiree Account Statement, shows an error for the RCSBP cost of $29.66 and request this error be corrected. She chose option C because their were no mention of RCSBP cost in Section VI, and the base personnel office did not make her aware of the cost associated with electing Option C. She never expected to pay for anything except for one payment for spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00348

    Original file (BC-2006-00348.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She has learned since her husband’s death that this package was mailed as registered mail with a suspense date of 90 days, requiring an election of A, B, or C to determine her annuity. There is no evidence he made an RCSBP election at that time. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by thanking the Air Force for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02261

    Original file (BC-2010-02261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was not informed that she could change her election when she got married in 2002. In addition, the applicant indicates that she was not aware she had the option of changing her election upon her marriage or of the open season; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence to show she did not have enough information available to her to make an informed decision. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01138

    Original file (BC 2009 01138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option C, "Immediate Annuity for spouse." Included with the letter was some general information on retired pay, the appropriate pay application forms, and information regarding her RCSBP election of automatic option "C." When the applicant filled out her application for retired pay DD Form 2656, she changed her election from spouse to electing not to participate in SBP. The Legal Advisor states the applicant may in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01138

    Original file (BC-2009-01138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option C, "Immediate Annuity for spouse." Included with the letter was some general information on retired pay, the appropriate pay application forms, and information regarding her RCSBP election of automatic option "C." When the applicant filled out her application for retired pay DD Form 2656, she changed her election from spouse to electing not to participate in SBP. The Legal Advisor states the applicant may in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02877

    Original file (BC-2010-02877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, because the former member did not take action to ensure the Air Force personnel system was updated, the Legal Advisor does not find it appropriate to charge the former member’s negligence against the applicant by denying coverage which Congress intended....