Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00411
Original file (BC-2010-00411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00411 

 INDEX CODE: 112.03 

 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His date of separation (DOS) of 14 Jan 13 be adjusted to reflect 
that he reenlisted for four years instead of five years. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He reenlisted for a term of four years, instead of five years as 
reflected in his record. His reenlistment contract incorrectly 
indicated he reenlisted for five years and he was told it would 
be corrected. His DOS should be four years from his 
reenlistment date of 15 Nov 07. Instead, his DOS incorrectly 
reflects 14 Jan 13. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System 
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant is currently serving on active 
duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), effective and with a 
date of rank of 1 Mar 08. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice. The applicant has provided no evidence 
his term of enlistment was four years. Information extracted 
from both MilPDS and official finance records indicate he 
reenlisted for five years and two months. While neither the Air 
Force nor the applicant possess a copy of his 15 Nov 07 


reenlistment documents, finance documents, to include any leave 
and earnings statement (LES), have shown his DOS as 14 Jan 13 
since he entered his current enlistment in Nov 07. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 26 Mar 10 for review and response within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In 
view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00411 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 10, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair 

 Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member 

 Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 10. 

 

 

 

 

 XXXXXXXXXX 

 Panel Chair 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03193

    Original file (BC-2010-03193.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His current reenlistment date of 29 Jul 08 be changed to a later date so that he may be paid a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03193 in Executive Session on 13 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05378

    Original file (BC 2013 05378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces Of the United States, dated 14 Oct 09, be changed to reflect a term of service of 6 years or 4 years with 24 months of obligated service instead of the 4 years of service it currently reflects. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02943

    Original file (BC-2010-02943.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant’s Coast Guard Achievement medal is on file in his SNCO Selection Record. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03879

    Original file (BC-2011-03879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) reenlistment office altered his DD Form 4/1 to reflect 8 Oct 2007 instead of the date he reenlisted (1 Oct 2007). The problem was the applicant's DOS/ETS was 7 Dec 2011 in DFAS system and 7 Jan 2012 in MILPDS (which coincides with the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment for four years and three months); the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment date was verified from his contract located in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03182

    Original file (BC-2007-03182.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS-JECC/DE states the applicant reenlisted on 3 Nov 03, entitling him to the SRB which was established in the amount of $60,000.00. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00841

    Original file (BC-2008-00841.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Feb 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and was issued an RE Code of 2B (involuntarily separated with a general discharge). The Board acknowledged the applicant’s high motivation to re-enter military service; however, the Board denied an upgrade of his RE code. As noted in the statement of facts his RE code has been administratively...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00245

    Original file (BC-2010-00245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) on 5 Apr 07 for outstanding achievement on 7 Aug 02. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-04506

    Original file (BC-2009-04506.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-04506 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of “Mental Disorder” and Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03396

    Original file (BC-2004-03396.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was returned to active duty on 23 Nov 03 in the grade of airman basic, with a DOR of 25 Mar 03. The applicant would not be eligible for promotion to airman until 8 Jan 05, airman first class until 8 Nov 05, and senior airman until 8 Mar 08. Completion of the RTDP does not even guarantee return to duty.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801

    Original file (BC-2007-02801.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.