RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00411
INDEX CODE: 112.03
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of separation (DOS) of 14 Jan 13 be adjusted to reflect
that he reenlisted for four years instead of five years.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He reenlisted for a term of four years, instead of five years as
reflected in his record. His reenlistment contract incorrectly
indicated he reenlisted for five years and he was told it would
be corrected. His DOS should be four years from his
reenlistment date of 15 Nov 07. Instead, his DOS incorrectly
reflects 14 Jan 13.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant is currently serving on active
duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), effective and with a
date of rank of 1 Mar 08.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. The applicant has provided no evidence
his term of enlistment was four years. Information extracted
from both MilPDS and official finance records indicate he
reenlisted for five years and two months. While neither the Air
Force nor the applicant possess a copy of his 15 Nov 07
reenlistment documents, finance documents, to include any leave
and earnings statement (LES), have shown his DOS as 14 Jan 13
since he entered his current enlistment in Nov 07.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 26 Mar 10 for review and response within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In
view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00411 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 10, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Mar 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 10.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03193
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His current reenlistment date of 29 Jul 08 be changed to a later date so that he may be paid a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03193 in Executive Session on 13 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05378
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces Of the United States, dated 14 Oct 09, be changed to reflect a term of service of 6 years or 4 years with 24 months of obligated service instead of the 4 years of service it currently reflects. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02943
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant’s Coast Guard Achievement medal is on file in his SNCO Selection Record. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03879
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) reenlistment office altered his DD Form 4/1 to reflect 8 Oct 2007 instead of the date he reenlisted (1 Oct 2007). The problem was the applicant's DOS/ETS was 7 Dec 2011 in DFAS system and 7 Jan 2012 in MILPDS (which coincides with the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment for four years and three months); the 8 Oct 2007 reenlistment date was verified from his contract located in...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03182
DFAS-JECC/DE states the applicant reenlisted on 3 Nov 03, entitling him to the SRB which was established in the amount of $60,000.00. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00841
On 2 Feb 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and was issued an RE Code of 2B (involuntarily separated with a general discharge). The Board acknowledged the applicant’s high motivation to re-enter military service; however, the Board denied an upgrade of his RE code. As noted in the statement of facts his RE code has been administratively...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) on 5 Apr 07 for outstanding achievement on 7 Aug 02. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-04506
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-04506 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of “Mental Disorder” and Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03396
She was returned to active duty on 23 Nov 03 in the grade of airman basic, with a DOR of 25 Mar 03. The applicant would not be eligible for promotion to airman until 8 Jan 05, airman first class until 8 Nov 05, and senior airman until 8 Mar 08. Completion of the RTDP does not even guarantee return to duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801
His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.