Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04595
Original file (BC-2009-04595.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-04595 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, Item 12, Foreign Service, be corrected to reflect seven 
months, rather than three months and four days. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His four months of foreign service at Aviano AB, Italy, for 
which he earned the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 
Medal, are not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, Contingency Exercise and Mobility (CEM) order, and 
excerpts of his college transcripts. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 7 Mar 94 and was progressively 
promoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4), effective and with 
a date of rank of 7 Sep 96. 

 

On 6 Mar 98, the applicant was honorably discharged at the 
completion of his required active service and was credited with 
four years of total active service. 

 

On 18 Mar 10, AFPC/DPAPP requested additional information from 
the applicant regarding the matter under review. In response, 
he provided a copy of his AF Form 623a, On-The-Job Training 
Record Continuation Sheet, and an expanded statement indicating 
his entitlement to the NATO Medal, in addition to all the other 
evidence provided, should be sufficient to substantiate his 
contentions. 

Item 13 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects his entitlement 
to the NATO Medal. 


 

In accordance with DoD 1348.33-M, Manual of Military Decorations 
and Awards, the NATO Medal was approved for U.S. military 
personnel who served under NATO command or operational control 
in direct support of NATO operations in the former Republic of 
Yugoslavia (FRY), or as designated by Supreme Allied Commander, 
Europe from July 1, 1992 - Oct. 12, 1998. 

 

In accordance with HQ CINCUSAREUR guidance during the period in 
question, qualifying periods of service were 30 days (continuous 
or accumulated) in the territory or air and space of the FRY and 
the Adriatic Sea, or 90 days (continuous or accumulated) in 
direct support of NATO operations in areas adjacent to the FRY. 
The area of eligibility included the countries of Italy, Greece, 
Hungary, and Austria. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence in 
the record to confirm the applicant’s participation in the 
contested deployment. Although he did provide a copy of a 
temporary duty (TDY) order, the order itself does not prove he 
actually deployed to Aviano AB, Italy. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
16 Apr 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
crediting the applicant with four additional months of foreign 


service. We note the comments by AFPC/DPAPP indicating the TDY 
order provided by the applicant is not sufficient, in and by 
itself, to confirm his claim he was deployed to Aviano AB, Italy 
for four months. Nonetheless, after careful review of the 
available records and the applicant’s complete submission, 
including his DD Form 214 reflecting his entitlement to the NATO 
Medal, we believe a preponderance of the evidence supports he is 
entitled to credit for four additional months of foreign 
service. Although the applicant requests his records be changed 
to reflect seven months of foreign service, the Board determined 
he should be credited with seven months and four days of total 
foreign service. Therefore, we recommend his records be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his 
DD Form 214, block 12f, Foreign Service, be corrected to reflect 
7 months and 4 days, rather than 3 months and 4 days. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-04595 in Executive Session on 13 Jul 10, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Nov 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 5 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Apr 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04662

    Original file (BC-2011-04662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Although he was overseas in Italy during the appropriate time frame for entitlement to the AFEM for Operation JOINT FORGE, his military personnel records and provided documentation are devoid of evidence to support claim of his presence in the designated AOE, thereby rendering the applicant ineligible for the AFEM. While the applicant states he served directly on the coast of the Adriatic Sea, he has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00563

    Original file (BC 2014 00563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. On 14 May 2014, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant by letter they were able to confirm boots-on-ground Foreign Service time at Tuzla Air Base, Bosnia-Herzegovina sometime in 2003. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01474

    Original file (BC-2011-01474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, does not reflect time served in Korea. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating they were unable to determine the amount of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03858

    Original file (BC-2006-03858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and the criteria for the medal. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 19 January 2007, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014803

    Original file (20130014803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal a copy of a NATO certificate or any other evidence showing award of the NATO Medal. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the NATO (FRY) Medal because he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal and the AFSM in support of Operation Joint Endeavor and Operation Deny Flight. The NATO Medal is not an Army award; therefore, this Board has no authority to award it.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02133

    Original file (BC-2008-02133.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He performed duties in Indochina in South Vietnam but the personnel officer at the time of his discharge had it in for him and removed all proof from his records. DPAPP states the applicant did not provide any documentation showing he served in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008- 02133...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00607

    Original file (BC-2008-00607.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00607 INDEX CODE: 100.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to show he served in Vietnam from 3 Mar 67 to 23 May 67 (2 months and 20 days). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02342

    Original file (BC 2013 02342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 September 2013, AFPC/DPAPP reviewed the applicant’s records and verified his boots on the ground Foreign Service time at Aviano Air Base, Italy from 11 July 1979 through 29 March 1982, the amount of Foreign Service time already listed on his DD Form 214. The SAEMR is awarded to all United States Air Force Service members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. There is insufficient documentation to support...