Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04662
Original file (BC-2011-04662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04662 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) 
due to his participation in Operation JOINT FORGE from 28 Aug 
1998 to 23 Dec 1998. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He cannot qualify for Veterans’ preference without being awarded 
the AFEM. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty; Special Order TE-0778; NATO Order, TE-0778, and OPM Vet 
Guide, Appendix A. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served in the Regular Air Force as a Fire 
Protection Journeyman, from 22 Nov 1995 to 21 Nov 1999. His TDY 
orders reflect that he was TDY in support of operations JOINT 
FORGE at San Vito, Italy from 28 Aug 1998 to 23 Dec 1998. He 
was credited with four years of active duty service, including 
four months, and one day of Foreign Service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for 
entitlement to the AFEM. DPAPP states a review of his Master 
Personnel Records (MPR) and documentation submitted failed to 
reveal any documents that substantiate foreign service time in 
support of Operation JOINT FORGE. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 


AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant's request for 
entitlement for award of the AFEM. DPSIDR was able to verify 
the applicant's entitlement to the NATO Medal, currently 
annotated on his DD Form 214, while temporarily assigned to San 
Vito Air Station, Italy, in support of Operation JOINT FORGE. 
No additional awards in support of Operation JOINT FORGE were 
verified. His MPR has been updated accordingly. 

 

The AFEM is given to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who, after 
1 Jul 1958, participated in U.S. Military operations, U.S. 
operations in direct support of the United Nations (UN), or U.S. 
operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations. Service 
members must have been permanently assigned, attached, or 
detailed to a unit that participated in or engaged in direct 
support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in a designated 
area of eligibility (AOE) in a foreign territory (or for the 
full period when an operation is less than 30 days in duration) 
or for 60 non-consecutive days provided the support involved 
entering the AOE. Those time limitations may be waived for 
people participating in actual combat operations. 

 

The AOE for entitlement to the AFEM during Operation JOINT FORGE 
is the total land or air space of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, 
or the Adriatic Sea. 

 

Although he was overseas in Italy during the appropriate time 
frame for entitlement to the AFEM for Operation JOINT FORGE, his 
military personnel records and provided documentation are devoid 
of evidence to support claim of his presence in the designated 
AOE, thereby rendering the applicant ineligible for the AFEM. 

 

His military financial records were reviewed by the Defense 
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), and there were no reports 
of Overseas Cost of Living Allowance, Hostile Fire/Imminent 
Danger Pay, or Combat Zone Tax Exclusion for the period between 
Aug 1998 and Dec 1998, which demonstrates the unlikelihood the 
applicant was in the AOE. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant responded stating he does not believe the denial 
is justified. He did serve directly on the coast of the 
Adriatic Sea. He was an Air Force firefighter and responded to 
several in-flight emergencies on battle damaged air craft 
returning from Bosnian missions. While it is true he was 
stationed at San Vito during his off shifts, his fire department 
(duty location) was directly on the coast of the Adriatic Sea at 
Brindisi Airport, Italy. His orders clearly stated that he was 
a member of Operation JOINT FORGE and his actions while on duty 
were in clear support of the Operation JOINT FORGE mission. He 


recognizes that he was never in Bosnia but he was in just as 
much danger of an aircraft catastrophe as the pilots themselves 
when they returned to the airfield with damaged aircraft. He 
implores the Board to take into account his actions in support 
of this operation, not just the geographical location of San 
Vito. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit F. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we are not persuaded that corrective action 
is warranted. In this respect we note that DoDM 1348.33-V2, Manual of Military Decorations and Awards: DoD Service Awards–
Campaign, Expeditionary, and Service Medals, states service 
members who were deployed to Bosnia Herzegovina or Croatia, or 
aboard U.S. naval vessels operating in the Adriatic Sea, or 
operating in the air space above these respective areas may be 
eligible for the AFEM. While the applicant states he served 
directly on the coast of the Adriatic Sea, he has not presented 
evidence which reveals he was assigned in a designated area of 
eligibility (AOE) for award of the AFEM. Therefore, the 
applicant has not met the established criteria for award of the 
AFEM. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2011-
04662 in Executive Session on 12 and 18 Jun 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The Board voted to correct the record as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2011-
04662: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 10 Jan 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 26 Jan 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 2012. 

 Exhibit F. Rebuttal, Applicant, dated 16 Feb 2012, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00563

    Original file (BC 2014 00563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. On 14 May 2014, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant by letter they were able to confirm boots-on-ground Foreign Service time at Tuzla Air Base, Bosnia-Herzegovina sometime in 2003. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02110

    Original file (BC-2012-02110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on a review of the applicant's military personnel record and provided documentation; he did not serve in the Areas of Eligibility (AOE) for award of the AFEM. Service members must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that participated in or engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068934C070402

    Original file (2002068934C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; temporary duty orders assigning him to Bosnia; a Certificate of Participation; two award certificates for the NATO Medal and the ARCOM; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award); and three messages authorizing the Kosovo Campaign Medal, the AFEM, and the NATO Medal for Kosovo. There is no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded the NATO Medal or the Kosovo Campaign Medal based on service in Kosovo. Evidence of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03925

    Original file (BC 2007 03925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03925 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). Following a review of the applicant’s records, they find no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016199

    Original file (20080016199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For operations in which personnel of only one military Service participate, the medal will be awarded only if there is no other suitable award available to that Service. For operations in which personnel of only one military Service participate, the medal will be awarded only if there is no other suitable award available to that Service. Although the applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the NATO Medal, the evidence shows he was awarded the NATO Medal for service with NATO in operations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081308C070215

    Original file (2002081308C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. There is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012948

    Original file (20140012948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 13-325, issued 30 October 2013, subject: Campaign, Expeditionary, and Service Medals for the Former Republic of Yugoslavia, states the area of eligibility for the AFEM would mirror that of the Kosovo Campaign Medal with the addition of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, and Hungary. Based on the evidence of his service in Bosnia, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 September 2002 should be corrected to show 6 months and 13 days of foreign service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010914C070208

    Original file (20040010914C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Medal and other campaign medals that he is entitled to. He should be entitled to award of the Army Expeditionary Medal and NATO Medal for Bosnia and other campaign medals for Operation Iraqi Freedom. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052876C070420

    Original file (2001052876C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 12f (Record of Service/Foreign Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Bosnia; correction of item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show award of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). However, there is no evidence available to the Board, and the applicant has provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007171

    Original file (20080007171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant served a period of qualifying service in Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of Operation Joint Endeavor thereby meeting the criteria for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. Therefore, item 13 on the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.