ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1993-00674
INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable
conditions) discharge.
discharge
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 21 Sep 93, the Board considered and denied a similar appeal. For an
accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request and the rationale
of the Board's earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit
G.
The applicant submitted a letter dated 13 Aug 07, requesting the Board
reconsider his request for upgrade of his discharge. He states his general
discharge and statement of service are not corresponding.
In support of his request, he provided a personal statement and his DD Form
214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, indicated on 14 Nov 07, that, on the basis of data
furnished, they are unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit I).
On 14 Nov 07, a request for information pertaining to his post-service
activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days
(Exhibit J). As of this date, no response has been received by this office
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the
weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the
applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any
previous application. However, since no new and relevant evidence has been
provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for
reconsideration. As the applicant has been previously advised,
reconsideration is provided only where newly discovered relevant evidence
is presented which was not available when the application was submitted.
Further, the reiteration of facts we have previously addressed,
uncorroborated personal observations, or additional arguments on the
evidence of record are not adequate grounds for reopening a case.
Therefore, in view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicant’s request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1993-
00674 in Executive Session on 11 Dec 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Member
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 2 Nov 93.
Exhibit H. Letter, Congressional Representative, dated
15 Aug 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. FBI Negative Reply, dated 14 Nov 07.
Exhibit J. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Nov 07, w/atch.
GREGORY A. PARKER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02051
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Sep 97 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. The RE code of 4I is correct since the applicant was on the Control Roster at the time of his separation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03810 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 27 Oct 61, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsuitability. The applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01676
Documentation provided by the applicant reflects that a citation for award of the DFC was submitted to the PACAF Awards and Decorations Board; the Board disapproved the DFC and recommended no lesser decoration be awarded. In both of the DPPPR evaluations the recommendation was to deny applicant’s request for reconsideration of the DFC. Exhibit C. Letters, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 12 Jun 07 and 17 Jul 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01260
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Aug 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03955 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ACM). In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with the ACM recommendation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02175
The command recommended that the package be resubmitted as an AFCM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. BY...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1999-02452A
On 21 Jan 00, the applicant’s request that he be awarded the Medal for Bravery for actions during World War II was considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit E. Through his senator, applicant again requests award of the “Medal for Bravery.” In addition to the statement from the applicant’s former group bombardier/navigator submitted with his initial...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01601 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Nov 24, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B be changed to a code which will allow him re-entry into the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00096
The Medical Consultant has no objective basis upon which to suspect mischief in the applicant's submission of the requested changes, considering the documentary evidence he has provided and the corrective measures already recommended on his behalf by an official of the California Air National Guard. His race should be annotated as a “White” or “Caucasian.” His education should be changed to reflect “2 years of college,” and his hair color should be changed to “Black.” While the applicant's...