RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01091
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Air Force Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru
TSgt), rendered for the period 30 May 07 through 29 May 08,
Section 3, Fitness, be corrected to reflect "meets standards."
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In May 2008, the waist measurement taken for the fitness
assessment was inaccurate. His waist measurement was 42
inches. On 28 May 08, he entered into the Healthy Living
Class and his measurement was 39.5 inches. He does not see how
it is possible to have vastly different measurements in such a
short time.
In support of his appeal, applicant provides copies of
documents extracted from his military personnel records.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade
of staff sergeant.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air
Force.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states that no evidence was
provided to show the measurement taken on 15 May 08 was
inaccurate. The applicant did not challenge this measurement
at the time of the test. His fitness assessment scores from
2 Apr 04 through 15 May 08 show a pattern of decreased
performance and his waist measurements reflect a steady
increase. Further, approving the request would be unfair to
other airmen who successfully passes his or her fitness
assessment and every airman who has failed and appropriately
suffered the consequences of not meeting the Air Force fitness
standards.
The AF/A1PP complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial. DESIDEP states the applicant has
not provided any evidence to support the 15 May 08 waist
measurement was inaccurate. Although, he had a decreased
measurement of 2.5 inches 13 days after the 15 May 08
measurement, this does not prove the original measurement was
inaccurate.
The AFPC/DPSIDEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 21 Aug 09 for review and comments within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in
the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the
existence of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
____________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2009-01091 in Executive Session on 22 Oct 09 under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, dated 6 Jul 09.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP, dated 30 Jul 09.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Aug 09.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01091
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Although, he had a decreased measurement of 2.5 inches 13 days after the 15 May 08 measurement, this does not prove the original measurement was inaccurate. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00706
Additionally, unit commanders may request an extension of the close-out date, when an individual is required to fitness test immediately preceding the EPR close-out date and fails to meet fitness standards. It appears the applicant contends that he was injured during the 22 Sep 08 PT test, and the test should be invalidated and the EPR closing on 9 Oct 08 should be declared void and removed from his records. Further, the Board is not persuaded the EPR should be voided, since he failed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03342
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03342 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 10 June 2009 through 9 June 2010 be declared void and removed from his records, and replaced with an AF Form 77, (Letter of Evaluation). Additional relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01710
A1PP states the applicants EPR is valid and should not be removed due to him receiving a valid failed fitness assessment on 29 Jul 09 and an LOR on 9 Feb 09. The DPSIMC complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02702
He asks the Board to consider his medical conditions and complications and how they have negatively impacted his ability to meet the Air Forces fitness requirements in relation to the new abdominal circumference, and how his long term affliction of obstructive sleep apnea has notably affected his fitness assessment scores in previous years. The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03057 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 2 July 2009 through 15 April 2010 be voided and removed from her records. The following is a resume of the applicants EPR profile: PERIOD ENDING PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION 20 Dec 01 (SrA)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01779
The applicant did not meet the minimum component for the waist measurement and therefore received an unsatisfactory rating for the fitness test. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). The applicant contends that his waist...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03673
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. Since the applicant was not exempt from the AC component, his AC measurement of 38.5 inches (at the time of the FA in question) was greater than the 37.5 inches required when all components are exempt except AC. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04234
DPSIM states that on 25 September 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation - specifically, a memo from the 382nd TRS superintendent stating that she was administered a fitness assessment by a non-PTL, non-prior service, technical student and a copy of her signed fitness assessment score sheet dated 5 June 2012. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...