Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00844
Original file (BC-2009-00844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00844 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of 
the United States, be corrected to reflect he served at Wheeler 
AFB, Tripoli. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served in Africa and his records do not reflect this in the 
Foreign Service section of his DD 214. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD 
Form 214. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 Aug 51, for 
a term of four years, and was progressively promoted to the grade 
of airman second class. He was honorably discharged on 
29 Aug 55, after he completed his term of service. He served a 
total of four years of active service. 

 

His DD 214, indicates award of the National Defense Service 
Medal, and the Occupational Medal (Germany). His record reflects 
he served 2 years, 3 months, and 14 days Foreign and/or Sea 
service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial and states, in part, that a review 
of the applicant’s available military records did not reveal an 
error to his Foreign Service. The applicant has the burden of 
providing sufficient evidence of probable material error or 
injustice. Based on the lack of documentation to substantiate 
his request, DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s 
request. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 26 Sep 09, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. No 
evidence has been presented showing the applicant’s entitlement 
to the requested service credit. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2009-00844 in Executive Session on 18 Nov 09, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 09, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Sep 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Sep 09. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00567

    Original file (BC-2009-00567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her late husband's DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, his death certificate and a letter from the Agent Orange Administration. On 19 Apr 08, AFPC/DPAPP requested the applicant provide documentation showing her late husband served in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00567...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00464

    Original file (BC-2009-00464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He flew over Vietnam many times during the Vietnam War as a plane refueler and should have been awarded the requested medals. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00760

    Original file (BC-2009-00760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect awards and decorations for his service in Vietnam. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00170

    Original file (BC-2010-00170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They indicated they were able to verify and confirm boots on the ground at Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the period 3 Dec 92 through 26 Feb 93 (2 months and 24 days); Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany for the period 7 May 97 through 1 Sep 97 (3 months and 26 days); Incirlik Air Base, Turkey for the period 8 Jun 96 through 1 Jun 98 (1 year, 11 months, and 25 days). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03763

    Original file (BC-2008-03763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. There are no documents or evidence within his records that reflect he served in Vietnam. However, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00211

    Original file (BC-2010-00211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For that reason, DPAPP sent the applicant a letter on 10 May 10 requesting documents such as travel vouchers, evaluation reports, or other official military documents that reflect his travel to Vietnam was completed along withthe inclusive dates of the travel; however, he did not respond.Therefore, DPAPP cannot support the applicant’s request.- The DPSOEcomplete evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation wasforwarded to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-04264

    Original file (BC-2009-04264.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Before 6 Jan 86, the AFOR—S was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. In light of the fact the applicant is currently serving as a member of the Air National Guard, and as a Reserve of the Air Force, and his foreign service in Turkey has been verified by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), we believe he is entitled to credit for the subject...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01166

    Original file (BC-2009-01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01166

    Original file (BC 2009 01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...