Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00418
Original file (BC-2009-00418.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-00418
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her reentry (RE) and separation (SPD) codes be changed to  waiverable  codes
that allows her to enlist in the military.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She is not a security risk and wants to be in the military.   Her  recruiter
told her choosing an open or general career field would result in her  being
assigned to the dental or medical  fields;  however,  she  was  assigned  to
Security  Forces.   Her  initial  reaction  was  “anxiety”  because  of  her
mother’s concern for  her  safety.   Her  request  to  be  reassigned  to  a
different career field was denied.

While she was awaiting discharge, she  realized  her  initial  reaction  was
extreme and requested her discharge be stopped but it was too late.

She should not have been assigned to Security  Forces;  however,  she  would
like to be in the medical field.

In support of the application, the applicant submits copies of her  personal
statement, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from  Active
Duty and several character reference letters.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 Apr 2008 for a  period
of six years.  After completion of Basic  Military  Training  and  Technical
School, she was assigned duties as a Security Forces helper.

In a Mental Health Evaluation dated 18 Jun 08, the applicant  was  diagnosed
with Axis I:  Adjustment Disorder with  Mixed  Anxiety  and  Depressed  Mood
after she was self-referred to the Behavioral Analysis Service (BAS) for  an
evaluation because she  reportedly  had  a  fear  of  using  weapons  and  a
subsequent lack of motivation to  continue  in  training.   She  reported  a
severe  philosophical  conflict  with  being  in  the  Security  Forces  and
resultant depression and anxiety.

On 23 Sep 08, her commander  notified  her  that  he  was  recommending  her
discharge from military service for Conditions that Interfere with  Military
Service, specifically, Mental Disorders.  A legal review  of  the  discharge
case file was found legally sufficient.  The  discharge  authority  approved
the recommended separation and the applicant was  discharged  on  8  Oct  08
with an uncharacterized character of service.  She was issued  a  separation
code of “JFY” (adjustment disorder) and an  RE  code  of  2C  (involuntarily
separated with an honorable discharge; or  entry  level  separation  without
characterization of service).  She had  served  5  months  and  24  days  on
active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial.  DPSOS states based  on  the  documentation
on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was  consistent  with
the procedural and substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  instruction
and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.   DPSOS  found  no
error or injustice  in  the  processing  of  the  applicant’s  discharge  to
warrant a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation.

The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the RE code 2C  is  the  only
authorized RE code for members who receive an entry  level  separation  with
an uncharacterized character of service.  The applicant did not provide  any
evidence to support an error or injustice.  A waiver of the RE  code  2C  by
the gaining service would be more appropriate than changing the DD Form  214
to reflect an incorrect RE code.

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the  applicant  on  22
May 09 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this  office
has received no response (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force  offices  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  the  conclusion
that the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved.  Therefore, the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 24 September 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Panel Chair
      Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-00418:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 09, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 8 Apr 09.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 7 May 09.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 22 May 09.



                                   JOSEPH D. YOUNT
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00232

    Original file (BC-2008-00232.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00232 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry code of "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) and her separation code of "JFX" (Personality Disorder) be changed. The applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00932

    Original file (BC-2009-00932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denying the applicant’s requests to change her separation code or narrative reason for separation. While she contends that she forgot about her pre- service medical conditions, the statement she signed while in BMT indicates that she did not disclose her medical conditions because she really wanted to join the Air Force and serve her country. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03053

    Original file (BC-2010-03053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service), her narrative reason for separation of “Personality Disorder,” and her separation code of “JFX.”,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01879

    Original file (BC-2009-01879.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ DPSOA recommends denial. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00546

    Original file (BC-2009-00546.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a character statement. In a mental health evaluation dated 7 Aug 08, he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. He received an RE code of 2C—“Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends correcting the applicant’s discharge separation code to reflect “JFY” and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03928

    Original file (BC-2010-03928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4K, which denotes “medically disqualified or pending medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB)” be changed to a RE code that will allow her to reenlist without a waiver. On 27 March 2002, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02847

    Original file (BC-2007-02847.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02847 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for discharge and her reentry code (RE) be changed to allow her to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02353

    Original file (BC-2012-02353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation) be changed to an RE code “1”. In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement and letters of recommendation. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03120

    Original file (BC-2007-03120.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provided no facts warranting changing the narrative reason for separation to “fulfillment of service” or a change to her RE code. Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26...