RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00365
INDEX CODE: 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Recruiter Ribbon Certification and two Weighted Airman
Promotion System (WAPS) points.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
For the past six months, the Air Force Recruiting Center (AFRC) has denied
him two WAPS points awarded with recruiter duties. He was an active duty
non-prior service recruiter from Mar 96 through Mar 00. He left the
recruiting field in Mar 00 and was reassigned to another base. While in-
processing, he received orders back into the recruiting field for a 120-day
contingency – from May 00 through Aug 00.
During the 08E7 promotion cycle, he missed promotion to Master Sergeant (E-
7) by 1.6 points. A review of his records by a fellow recruiter revealed
that he had not received his Recruiting Ribbon or the two WAPS points that
are associated with it. The Military personnel Flight (MPF) personnel
determined that he met the requirements to qualify for the Recruiting
Ribbon and the two WAPS points IAW MPF Memorandum 00-39, dated 8 Nov 00.
The memo states “Individuals performing duty in the 8R000 AFSC on 21 Jun 00
or later that have accrued 36 months in that duty and are certified by
their Recruiting Service Commander are entitled to two WAPS points.” He
sent a letter to Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) promotions section to be
forwarded to AFRS requesting the WAPS points be added to his 08E7 test
results. AFRS denied his request stating he was not qualified for the two
points because he was not permanently assigned to a Recruiting Squadron and
he did not serve 36 consecutive months as a recruiter immediately prior to,
then through, the June 21, 2000 effective date of the Recruiter Ribbon.
However, the MPFM states “Individuals performing duties in the 8R000 AFSC
on 21 Jun 00 or later…” and “…have accrued 36 months in that duty…” and he
meets these requirements.
He filed an Inspector General (IG) complaint which was dismissed by the
AFRS IG without further action. He then filed a complaint with the
Congressional Inquiry Division (CID) which was denied. The CID stated that
he “had completed his Recruiting tour of duty before the establishment of
the Ribbon, June 21, 2008, and was never certified by his Recruiting
Service Commander as eligible for the WAPS points before his promotion
eligibility cutoff date.” However, the establishment date of the Ribbon is
June 21, 2000 and not 2008.
Recruiters are certified by their Recruiting Service Commander (RSC) around
their second or third year and he was fully certified while recruiting in
Massachusetts. The MPFM 00-39 does not state “when” you had to be
certified but only that you had to be certified by your RSC. Requirements
for other types of certification are not mentioned in the MPFM 00-39;
however, he should have received any additional certification from his
previous RSC or AFRS. He performed the same duties and other recruiters
who received the points during this time period.
In support of the application, the applicant submits his personal
statement, the MPFM 00-39, memorandums, and a letter of appreciation.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant is currently performing duties as a Development and
Instruction Section Chief in the grade of Technical Sergeant effective and
with a date of rank of 1 Nov 02. He received a rating of “five” on his
last five performance reports with the last close out date of 2 Apr 09.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRS/RSX recommends denial. RSX states the Recruiter Ribbon was
established to designate past, present and future active duty, Reserve and
Guard Recruiters. WAPS points were added to the ribbon as an incentive for
active duty enlisted members currently serving in recruiting special duty
identifiers (SDI) 84000. The targeted recipients of the WAPS points are
Recruiters who successfully complete 36 months of recruiting duty from
21 Jun 00 to present. WAPS points are not authorized for individuals with
prior recruiting service requesting authorization to permanently wear the
ribbon.
The applicant is recognized as a PRIOR RECRUITER assigned to a Recruiting
Squadron from 15 Mar 96 to 9 Mar 00. After completion of his tour in the
8R000 SDI, he returned to his primary Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) and
was assigned to another base effective 10 Mar 00. He left recruiting duty
three months prior to the establishment of the Recruiter Ribbon and he did
not serve 36 consecutive months as a recruiter immediately prior to, then
through, the 21 Jun 00 effective date of the Recruiter Ribbon.
Additionally, he had not received permanent certification/award of the
Recruiter Ribbon/WAPS points from his Recruiting Commander. The applicant
meets the requirement for the Recruiter Ribbon; however, he is not eligible
for the two Recruiter Ribbon WAPS points.
He was not performing duties in the 8R000 AFSC from May 00 through Aug 00.
Individuals performing duties in this AFSC are considered goaled recruiters
who are required to recruit a specific number of personnel in a defined
period of time. As a prior recruiter, the applicant was assigned temporary
duty (TDY) to a recruiting squadron “to support critical AETC contingency
tasking.” He was not on goal but successfully assisted the assigned/goaled
8R00s with their recruiting efforts during his 120-day TDY. He was
recognized for his contributions to the recruiting mission as noted in the
narrative of the AF Commendation Medal he received on 23 May 02 which
earned him three WAPS points.
Time served as a Recruiter PRIOR to the effective date of the Recruiter
Ribbon will not be combined with a 120-day TDY that took place during the
effective period in order to make a member eligible for award of the WAPS
points.
Individuals with prior duty in SDI 8R000 may request authorization to
permanently wear the AF Recruiter Ribbon through their unit commander and
HQ AFRS must approve; however, no WAPS points will be retroactively
awarded. The applicant would have had to receive permanent certification
and award of the two WAPS points PRIOR TO his Promotion Eligibility Cutoff
Date (PECD) in order for the points to apply to the 08E7 promotion cycle.
Although the applicant states never knew about the Recruiter Ribbon,
information pertaining to the Recruiter Ribbon was announced via several
media outlets including the AF Times, AF News, and the AF On-line News.
The complete RSX evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Mar
09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that warrant granting his request that his
records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Recruiter Ribbon
Certification and two Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS) points. We
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, after a thorough review of the evidence of record, it
appears that he was not performing Recruiter duties at the time that would
have made him eligible to receive the Recruiter Ribbon Certification and
two WAPS points. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility in this matter and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 August 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Dick Anderegg, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-00365:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jan 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRS/RSX, dated 2 Mar 08 [sic}.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 09.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02182
The applicant performed as a recruiter for only 123 days after the 21 Jun 00 date. DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the criteria for awarding of both AF Recruiting Ribbon and the award of two points for WAPS testing is established in MPFM 00-39 and attachments. The attachment to MPFM 00-39 specifying the guidelines states in the introduction,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-01538
On 19 Jun 00, the Secretary of the Air Force established an Air Force Recruiter Ribbon to recognize those officer and enlisted personnel who performed the challenging duty of an Air Force Recruiter. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was a “current recruiter” on 21 Jun 00, at the time the Air Force Recruiter Ribbon and WAPS points became effective, and as required for award of the ribbon...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00996
He completed his CCAF degree requirements prior to retirement; however, he cannot receive his degree because of the “9A100” AFSC. He struggled as a manager because he had never been in a management position until this point. The 3 applicant requests his AFSC of 9A100 be changed to 8R000; we find the evidence provided is insufficient to recommend granting his stated request.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00938
The Air Force should have made the decision of changing this policy to be effective for future recruiting goals in the recruiting career field and provided a definitive date of implementation rather than affecting personnel currently serving in that duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and do not find that it supports a determination that he be awarded two WAPS points for his Air Force Recruiting ribbon. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02286 COUNSEL: MAJ THOMAS L. FARMER HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to master sergeant with an effective date of promotion and a date of rank as a promotee in the SDI 8J000, Correctional Custody career field for 1998 or 1999. The applicant believes that two of the...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and indicated that the contested report would normally have been eligible for promotion consideration for the 96E7 cycle to master sergeant (promotions effective Aug 96 - Jul 97). Consequently, he was ineligible for promotion consideration for the 96B7 cycle based on both the referral EPR and the PES Code “Q”. Even if the board directs removal of the referral report, the applicant would not...
When she was subsequently considered in the correct promotion AFSC, 8B000 (Military Training Instructor), she was not selected. According to the Air Force, had she been considered in the MTI career field, she still would not have been selected because her test score was too low. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00365
He states that at the time he was considered for promotion to MSgt, he had more than 12 months left until retirement. Counsel opines that based on the stipulations in AFI 36-2502 and AFRC 36-2102, the Air Force could have, and should have, granted the applicant the promotion to master sergeant (MSgt). The waiver was denied because the applicant would have only been able to perform duty as a MSgt for 10 months before reaching his mandatory retirement at High Year of Tenure Date of 20 Mar 07.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00365
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 8 Jun 92 for 4 yrs. As a result, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 24 Jan 94.