RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01583
INDEX CODE: 110.02
xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was addicted to marijuana for many years of his life. He was a young
man with many struggles in life. He has completed and graduated from the
Salvation Army Adult Rehabilitation Program. His life is getting back on
track and he has no further desire to use drugs or alcohol.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form
214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and a
letter of endorsement from the Salvation Army Adult Rehabilitation Center.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 Jul 71, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade
of airman basic for a period of four years. He was progressively promoted
to the grade of airman first class, having assumed that grade effective and
with a date of rank of 1 Feb 72.
On 23 Mar 72, he received nonjudicial punishment for larceny. His
punishment consisted of a reduction to the grade of airman (E-2) and
forfeiture of $150 per month for two months. The portion of his punishment
which provided for reduction in grade was suspended until 20 Jun 72 unless
sooner vacated.
On 19 Apr 72, he received a vacation of suspension as a result of his
wrongful possession of marijuana.
On 28 Apr 72, he received nonjudicial punishment for wrongful possession of
marijuana. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the grade of basic
airman (E-1).
On 24 Aug 72, his commander notified him of his intent to recommend him for
discharge under the provisions of AFM 39-12, with a general discharge for
his continuous use of marijuana despite counseling and rehabilitation
efforts and on the Deputy Surgeon's recommendation that he be separated
with a diagnosis of drug abuser, marijuana type. On 28 Sep 72, the staff
judge advocate found the discharge action legally sufficient and
recommended the applicant be separated with an undesirable discharge in
view of the documented history of larceny and possession of a significant
quantity of marijuana. The discharge authority approved the commander’s
recommendation with the exception that the applicant be separated with an
undesirable discharge. He served one year, three months and five days of
active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at
Exhibit C. On 18 Sep 08, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
On 28 May 08, the applicant was given the opportunity to submit comments
about his post service activities (Exhibit D). The applicant states he has
been in and out of many detox centers until he went to St. Petersburg
Salvation Army. He has opened up to his counselors and has admitted to his
wrongdoings. He has struggled with addiction most of his life and is
finally free and is asking for compassion to be shown for his past actions.
The applicant submits supporting letters and a character reference letter.
The applicant's complete letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no
evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge
processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The
applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the
characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the
governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses
committed. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency;
however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us
to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend granting the relief sought.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 5 Nov 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
Mrs. Lea Gallogly, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2008-
01583 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report No. 624310K4,
dated 16 May 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Sep 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 May 08.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Letter, dated 26 Jun 08, w/atchs.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02800
On 22 March 1985, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman first class (E-3) for misconduct – civilian conviction, with a general service characterization. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00785
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00785 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Apr 08.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00779
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00779 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. On 17 Apr 08, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03129
On 4 April 1986, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman first class (E-3) for misconduct – drug abuse, with a general service characterization. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-03129 in Executive Session on 29 October 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 13 May 1981 under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (Misocnduct- Drug Abuse - Board), with an undesirable discharge. In this case, the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. Therefore, we agree with opinions and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02666
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS During the time he was in the Air Force, it was very difficult for Blacks. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02666 in Executive Session on 16 December 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00232_
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00232 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JUL 08 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded. A copy of the report was provided to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02911
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The incident which precipitated the action was a gang fight on 29 July 1964 involving the applicant, another airman, and five civilian youths. The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-02911 in Executive Session on 29 October 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01267
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS We also find no evidence to indicate the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by General Court-Martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. We have considered applicant's overall quality of service, the General Court-Martial conviction that precipitated the discharge, and the seriousness of the offenses of which...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00692
He served four years on active duty with 106 days lost time. We also considered upgrading his discharge based on clemency; however, noting his apparent misconduct following his discharge as indicated on the FBI report, we do not believe a recommendation that the characterization of his discharge be upgraded on that basis is warranted. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.