Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00632
Original file (BC-2008-00632.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-00632
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, lumbosacral or cervical  strain  be
assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He does not dispute the findings of the  lumbosacral  strain.   Although  he
fell when dismounting from a  jeep,  he  continued  his  mission  with  some
discomfort.  He did not complain  or  report  the  incident  to  the  flight
surgeon; this would have resulted in him  being  grounded.   He  takes  full
responsibility for not reporting the fall  and  is  willing  to  accept  the
consequences.

In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement.

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 September 1965, the applicant retired from the Air Force in the  grade
of lieutenant colonel, after serving 24 years,  11  months  and  5  days  on
active duty.

He initially applied for CRSC for impaired hearing and  back  strain  on  25
June 2003.  His request was disapproved on 16 September 2003.   He  appealed
the decision on 11 February 2004 and it was disapproved  on  24  March  2004
for lack of evidence directly relating his disabilities to a  combat-related
factor.  He filed a second appeal on 17 May  2004  and  provided  additional
documentation.  His appeal was disapproved on 18 May 2004.  No evidence  was
provided to confirm these disabilities  were  the  direct  result  of  armed
conflict, hazardous service, instrumentality of war, or simulating  war.   A
review of his file on 16 January 2008, determined that his impaired  hearing
qualified for CRSC  under  current  guidelines  and  CRSC  was  subsequently
approved for impaired hearing with a  special  monthly  compensation  on  31
January 2008.  He filed his third appeal for his back strain on 15  February
2008 and it was disapproved on 26 March 2008 for lack  of  evidence  showing
his back strain was a direct result of a combat-related factor.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPSD provides  a  review  of  the  applicant’s
medical records and notes that he  initially  stated  he  injured  his  back
“during  embarkation  for  reconnaissance  mission  over  Japan.”   He  also
contends that he injured his back when he dismounted from a jeep.  In  order
for the disability to be eligible for compensation under CRSC the  condition
must  meet   the   rigorous   standards   established   for   combat-related
disabilities and not merely have a  service  connection.   Therefore,  there
must be documentation that shows  a  direct  combat-related  cause  of  each
disability.  It is evident he had repeated back discomfort during and  after
military service; however, there  is  no  evidence  to  indicate  that  this
condition was directly caused by a combat-related factor.   Medical  records
dated 30 April 1965, notes, "No significant history  of  injury  other  than
falling out of a jeep."  Other  medical  records  dated  19  November  2003,
notes "Veteran states he originally injured his back in 1948, when  he  fell
off a jeep on the flight deck and broke his tail bone.  He  did  not  report
it since he was a pilot and later examined by a physician and told he had  a
coccyx fracture, due to the  continued  pain  he  was  experiencing."   DPPD
states there is nothing in the  available  evidence  directly  relating  his
disability to a combat-related event or activity.

 The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16  May
2008 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  this  office
has received no response (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The available evidence of record does  not
support a finding that the service-connected medical condition  he  believes
is combat-related was incurred as  the  direct  result  of  armed  conflict,
while engaged in  hazardous  service,  in  the  performance  of  duty  under
conditions simulating war,  or  through  an  instrumentality  of  war;  and,
therefore,  does  not  qualify  for  compensation  under   the   CRSC   Act.
Accordingly, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the  Air  Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the  basis  for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of  error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2008-00632
in Executive Session on 4 August 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                       Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                       Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 February 2008, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Master Military Personnel Records
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 5 May 2008, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 2008.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03802

    Original file (BC-2007-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal letter and documentation associated with her CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 90% for her service-connected conditions. The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 February 2008 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03362

    Original file (BC-2008-03362.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because he did not seek medical attention, documentation of lower back injuries does not exist. His CRSC application was disapproved on 27 March 2006 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat-related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01010

    Original file (BC-2006-01010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states that while it is evident the applicant received significant treatment throughout his career for the injuries directly relating and secondary to the fall from the ladder, the evidence does not clearly support his contention that the fall was due to a combat related factor. SF 600, Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 27 December 2000, showed complaints of right hip pain. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-03072

    Original file (BC-2006-03072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The injury to his left foot occurred under conditions simulating war. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to show that his ankle and back were the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03955

    Original file (BC-2006-03955.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03955 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program so he may qualify for compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02532

    Original file (BC-2003-02532.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His next entry for back pain was on 21 Mar 85 when he sought care for low back pain incurred while lifting a manhole cover. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02048

    Original file (BC-2006-02048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states the applicant believes his back condition is directly related to performing aircrew duties. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911

    Original file (BC-2003-03911.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02905

    Original file (BC-2006-02905.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states medical records were kept in the Philippines and during that time limited records were forwarded from Vietnam. The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 July 2007 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04103

    Original file (BC-2007-04103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not qualify...