RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00632
INDEX CODE: 108.07
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical condition, lumbosacral or cervical strain be
assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the
Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He does not dispute the findings of the lumbosacral strain. Although he
fell when dismounting from a jeep, he continued his mission with some
discomfort. He did not complain or report the incident to the flight
surgeon; this would have resulted in him being grounded. He takes full
responsibility for not reporting the fall and is willing to accept the
consequences.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 30 September 1965, the applicant retired from the Air Force in the grade
of lieutenant colonel, after serving 24 years, 11 months and 5 days on
active duty.
He initially applied for CRSC for impaired hearing and back strain on 25
June 2003. His request was disapproved on 16 September 2003. He appealed
the decision on 11 February 2004 and it was disapproved on 24 March 2004
for lack of evidence directly relating his disabilities to a combat-related
factor. He filed a second appeal on 17 May 2004 and provided additional
documentation. His appeal was disapproved on 18 May 2004. No evidence was
provided to confirm these disabilities were the direct result of armed
conflict, hazardous service, instrumentality of war, or simulating war. A
review of his file on 16 January 2008, determined that his impaired hearing
qualified for CRSC under current guidelines and CRSC was subsequently
approved for impaired hearing with a special monthly compensation on 31
January 2008. He filed his third appeal for his back strain on 15 February
2008 and it was disapproved on 26 March 2008 for lack of evidence showing
his back strain was a direct result of a combat-related factor.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPSD provides a review of the applicant’s
medical records and notes that he initially stated he injured his back
“during embarkation for reconnaissance mission over Japan.” He also
contends that he injured his back when he dismounted from a jeep. In order
for the disability to be eligible for compensation under CRSC the condition
must meet the rigorous standards established for combat-related
disabilities and not merely have a service connection. Therefore, there
must be documentation that shows a direct combat-related cause of each
disability. It is evident he had repeated back discomfort during and after
military service; however, there is no evidence to indicate that this
condition was directly caused by a combat-related factor. Medical records
dated 30 April 1965, notes, "No significant history of injury other than
falling out of a jeep." Other medical records dated 19 November 2003,
notes "Veteran states he originally injured his back in 1948, when he fell
off a jeep on the flight deck and broke his tail bone. He did not report
it since he was a pilot and later examined by a physician and told he had a
coccyx fracture, due to the continued pain he was experiencing." DPPD
states there is nothing in the available evidence directly relating his
disability to a combat-related event or activity.
The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 May
2008 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The available evidence of record does not
support a finding that the service-connected medical condition he believes
is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict,
while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under
conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and,
therefore, does not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act.
Accordingly, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied
without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-00632
in Executive Session on 4 August 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 February 2008, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Master Military Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 5 May 2008, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 2008.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03802
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal letter and documentation associated with her CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 90% for her service-connected conditions. The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 February 2008 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03362
Because he did not seek medical attention, documentation of lower back injuries does not exist. His CRSC application was disapproved on 27 March 2006 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat-related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01010
DPPD states that while it is evident the applicant received significant treatment throughout his career for the injuries directly relating and secondary to the fall from the ladder, the evidence does not clearly support his contention that the fall was due to a combat related factor. SF 600, Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 27 December 2000, showed complaints of right hip pain. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-03072
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The injury to his left foot occurred under conditions simulating war. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to show that his ankle and back were the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03955 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program so he may qualify for compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02532
His next entry for back pain was on 21 Mar 85 when he sought care for low back pain incurred while lifting a manhole cover. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02048
DPPD states the applicant believes his back condition is directly related to performing aircrew duties. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911
A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02905
He states medical records were kept in the Philippines and during that time limited records were forwarded from Vietnam. The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 July 2007 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04103
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not qualify...