Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00593
Original file (BC-2008-00593.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00593
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
      xxxxxxxxxxxx     COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been medically discharged due to the fact the  Department  of
Veterans Affairs (DVA) has  deemed  him  100%  disabled  for  Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD).  He did not know he had PTSD  at  the  time  of  his
discharge.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his  DVA  rating
decision, DD Form 214 and the second page to an  Airman  Performance  Report
(APR).   The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in the Air Force from 30 Apr  79  to  16  Feb  82,  and
received  an  honorable  discharge.   His  highest  grade  held  was   staff
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1
Aug 80.

On 11 Aug 81,  the  applicant  was  entered  into  the  drug  rehabilitation
program.   While  in  the  program,  he  received  two  additional  positive
urinalysis tests and was declared a program failure.

On  3  Dec  81,  the  applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that   he   was
recommending he be discharged from the  Air  Force  for  personal  abuse  of
drugs.  The commander recommended an honorable  discharge.   On  3  Dec  81,
applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification  of  discharge.   He  was
advised of his rights, consulted counsel and elected  to  submit  statements
in his own behalf.

The Staff Judge Advocate found the case file legally sufficient  to  support
an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation.  The  discharge
authority approved the separation and directed an honorable discharge.

He was discharged on 16 Feb 82, in the grade of staff  sergeant,  under  the
provisions of AFM 39-12, by reason of personal abuse  of  drugs  other  than
alcohol, and received an honorable discharge.  He served on active duty  for
a period of 10 years, 6 months, and 17 days.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial.  The BCMR Medical  Consultant
states  that  at  the  time  of  the  applicant's  discharge  there  was  no
indication he was either suffering from a medical  condition  that  impaired
his ability to  perform  his  military  duties  or  one  that  independently
warranted, by virtue of  established  medical  policies  a  referral  for  a
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).  Thus, his  medical  fitness  for  duty  was
never brought into question.  The BCMR Medical Consultant advises  that  the
DVA is authorized to offer compensation for any medical condition  found  to
be service-connected without regard to its previously  demonstrated  impact,
or  lack  thereof,  upon  his  retainability.   The  complete  BCMR  Medical
Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16  May
08 for review and response within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  this  office
has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  We  are  not  persuaded  by  the  evidence
presented that the applicant’s discharge was improper  or  contrary  to  the
provisions of the governing  regulations,  which  implement  the  law.   The
applicant points to the service-connection determination and the  disability
assessment and rating he received from the DVA.  We note that, by  law,  the
DVA is a separate Federal  agency  with  a  different  mission  governed  by
different standards and its decisions are not binding on  this  Board.   The
DVA  finding  that  the  applicant’s  condition  was  incurred   during   or
aggravated by his service appears to  be  contravened  by  the  evidence  of
record  that  at  the  time  of  the  applicant's  discharge  there  was  no
indication he was either suffering from a medical  condition  that  impaired
his ability to perform his military duties or one that warranted a  referral
for  an  MEB.   Therefore,  we  are  in  agreement  with  the  BCMR  Medical
Consultant's assessment that the applicant has not been  the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
00593 in Executive Session on 16 Jul 08, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
      Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
      Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to  Docket  Number         BC-
2008-00593 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 08, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 12 May 08.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 08.




                                             JAY H. JORDAN
                                             Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00882

    Original file (BC-2006-00882.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 82, in a Waiver of Disposition Board Proceedings, the applicant voluntarily indicated he no longer wished to participate in the 3320th Correction and Rehabilitation Squadron (CRS) Program at Lowry AFB, CO. On 4 Mar 82, the 3320 CRS commander notified the applicant he was recommending a general discharge for failure to complete the Rehabilitation Program and because of evidence of misconduct documented in the applicant’s military record. After 2 years, 10 months, and 15 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00457

    Original file (BC-2008-00457.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00457 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 10 percent disability rating he received from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) be added to his 20 percent disability rating in order to award him permanent disability retirement. The Medical Consultant states in order...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02430

    Original file (BC-2004-02430.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCMR Medical Consultant does not conclude that the evidence in the service medical records support change of records to show disability discharge for anxiety disorder and notes that the predominant diagnosis interfering with duty at the time was the non-compensable personality disorder. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A response to the Air Force evaluation was provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02419

    Original file (BC-2007-02419.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00361

    Original file (BC-2008-00361.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Mar 08, for review and comment within 30 days. The Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit G. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01536

    Original file (BC 2014 01536 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, even when considering possible overlapping symptoms of PTSD, Panic Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder, military officials determined that it was his co-morbid Personality Disorder that presented the greatest obstacle to his treatment and retention and, thus, recommended the administrative discharge. The proposed treatment for his anxiety disorder in 1985 was appropriate regardless of the differential diagnosis (e.g., PTSD vs. Panic Disorder). The applicant is advised that a diagnosis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03095

    Original file (BC-2003-03095.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 March 2000, the applicant submitted her rebuttal letter to SAFPC requesting a disability retirement, with a compensable disability rating of 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and is of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence of the record supports a disability rating of 20 percent. A complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03925

    Original file (BC-2006-03925.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03925 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received a medical retirement or a medical discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01028

    Original file (BC-2005-01028.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01028 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her honorable discharge be suspended until the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) status is complete and she receive incapacitation pay and back pay for the time she was unable to work....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00046

    Original file (BC-2006-00046.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The arrest report revealed a blood pressure reading of 200/140 at the time of the arrest. Review of the service medical records revealed that the applicant was placed in an alcohol rehabilitation program 10 Nov 81. The applicant's alcohol use during the last two years of service is well documented in the service medical records from the Alcoholism Rehabilitation Center at Sheppard AFB, in addition to reports from his commander of two civilian arrests for alcohol abuse, one for public...