RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04029
INDEX CODE: 128.14
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The recoupment action of his $11,581.56, Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB) be waived.
2. He be reimbursed for his final net pay of $3731.93 that was applied to
the debt.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His unit closed and he was given the option to apply for Palace Chase,
cross train into another airframe, or retrain into a non-flying career
field. He chose Palace Chase and despite the fact the application stated
he may be required to pay back the SRB, the Military Personnel Flight (MPF)
stated it would be waived. He spoke with AFPC several times prior to
applying for Palace Chase concerning his retraining/SRB options. He was
ensured his SRB would be waived in accordance with AFI 36-2626, Airman
Retraining Program table 3.1, rule 6, note 9, which covers unit closures.
He separated 9 August 2007. On 15 August 2007 he did not receive a
paycheck or money for the 39 1/2 days of leave he sold. The Defense
Accounting System (DFAS) put a hold on his pay because he owed money for
the SRB. After several phone calls, DFAS indicated his separation program
designator (SPD) code needed changing; otherwise, there was nothing they
could do.
In support of his request the applicant provided a personal statement,
excerpts from AFI 36-2626 and e-mail communiqués.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 March 1999, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force for six years and
as a security forces specialist and was guaranteed an initial enlistment
bonus of $4000.00.
On XXX 2005, he reenlisted and received a zone A SRB multiple 2.
Applicant was released from active duty on 9 August 2007, in the grade of
staff sergeant, under the Palace Chase program, to serve in the Reserve
component and he received a separation program designation code of "KGQ"
which denotes the bonus is recouped unless the applicant was separated
under Force Shaping.
Because he was not separated under Force Shaping, a debt of $11,581.56 was
established.
His net pay of $3731.93 was applied to this debt.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the AF Form 2631, Palace Chase
Statement of Understanding/Contract, item 1g, states "If I have been paid a
bonus, I will be required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus prior
to my separation from active duty." The applicant initialed the block
along with the rest of the form and signed it in the presence of a witness.
AFI 36-3205, Applying for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs,
clearly states the member must repay any unearned portion of an enlistment
or reenlistment bonus.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
DFAS-JECC/DE recommends denial. DE states the applicant is requesting a
waiver of the SRB recoupment debt in the amount of $11,581.56. He is also
requesting he be reimbursed his final net pay of $3731.93, which was
applied to his debt. The SRB debt was established due to the SPD code
assigned upon separation. The master military pay account (MMPA) shows he
separated with a SPD code of KGQ which indicates the bonus is to be
recouped unless he separated under Force Shaping. Since he did not
separate under Force Shaping, the debt is valid.
The complete DE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22
February 2008 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. In this respect,
as a result of an impending unit closure, the applicant was provided the
option to select retraining or Palace Chase. After seeking counsel from
the MPF and HQ AFPC, he chose Palace Chase. He made his decision in good
faith, based upon guidance he received, which led him to believe that
because he was involved in a unit closure, recoupment of his SRB would be
waived. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the applicant has established
reasonable doubt as to whether or not he was properly counseled, and it is
our belief that any doubt in this matter should be resolved in his favor.
In view of the above, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 August 2007, he applied for
remission of the debt arising from the unearned portion of the Selective
Reenlistment Bonus he received in conjunction with his 3 March 1999
enlistment, and his request was approved by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
04029 in Executive Session on 27 March 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Panel Chair
Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Member
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-04029 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 December 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 19 December 2007.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-JECC/DE, dated 1 February 2008.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 February 2008.
GREGORY A. PARKER
Panel Chair
Air Force Board for Correction
[pic]
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2007-04029
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 9 August 2007,
he applied for remission of the debt arising from the unearned portion of
the Selective Reenlistment Bonus he received in conjunction with his 3
March 1999 enlistment, and his request was approved by competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
[pic]
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01871
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy a personal statement, copies of AF Forms 1288 (Application for Ready Reserve Assignment) and a 29 June 2004 letter requesting a date of separation under PALACE CHASE. DPPRSR states the applicant’s AF Form 1288, dated 30 March 2004, is dated after the Force Shaping Phase I program ended. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01871 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02810 INDEX CODE 128.10 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A pro-rated portion (approximately $666.67) of his original enlistment bonus be refunded. Information about PALACE CHASE is provided with the applicant’s military personnel records at Exhibit B. Recommend disapproval of his request...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01971
He transferred into Palace chase and is performing the exact Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) that he performed for more than six years while on active duty. He served 3 years, 6 months and 27 days in the regular Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02399
The applicant separated under the provisions of PALACE CHASE on 1 January 2012 with a separation program designator of KGQ – PALACE CHASE. The applicant separated from active duty via the PALACE CHASE program and the only SPD code for members separating after fulfilling their military service obligation is KGQ. The applicant separated from active duty with a debt of $2,468.98 due to an unearned portion of a bonus.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00416
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial as the SPD of “MGQ” is appropriate for those service members who have not completed the required Military Service Obligation of eight years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01898
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01898 INDEX CODE: 128.05 BRIAN J. HIPOL COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 December 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Recoupment of his unearned Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. Since the applicant separated before completing the time agreed to serve, recoupment was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02306
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should still be eligible for his ACP since he transferred to a full time position with the Air National Guard (ANG) and will be performing the same duties that qualified him for ACP on active duty. They point out that paragraph 2.2, “Recoupment,” states officers will be advised that if the SecAF approves their request for release from active duty or accepts their resignations, they may be subject...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03182
DFAS-JECC/DE states the applicant reenlisted on 3 Nov 03, entitling him to the SRB which was established in the amount of $60,000.00. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28...