RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03327
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Block 14, be corrected to reflect “Basic Military
Training, 6 weeks, November 11, 2005,” as well as “Enlisted Air Crew
Undergraduate Course, December 14, 2005,” and “Survival Training Course, 17
days, January 25, 2006.” Additionally, Blocks 25, 26, 27, and 28 be
corrected to reflect the medical diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD) in remission.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation is not correct. She has received a
second opinion which indicates she does not have a personality disorder.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of an initial
evaluation from a mental health clinic.
Her complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 Sep 05 and following
completion of Basic Military Training, was enrolled in technical training
at Lackland AFB, TX.
On 31 Jan 07, she was notified by her commander of pending discharge
action. The specific reason for this action was based on the diagnosis by
the Behavioral Analysis Service, of anxiety disorder not otherwise
specified and resolution and learning disorder. The clinical
neurophysiologist determined her diagnosis did not meet retention standards
for continued military service and her ability to function in a military
environment was significantly impaired. She acknowledged receipt of the
notification, elected to consult with counsel and submitted statements in
her own behalf. The applicant requested a second opinion of her medical
evaluation because she felt that the mental evaluation was incorrect. On
18 Dec 06, the commander considered her request but recommended her
discharge be continued. The staff judge advocate found the case legally
sufficient and on 9 Apr 07, the discharge authority directed that the
applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-
32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.9.3, Conditions that Interfere with
Military Service, Mental Disorders, with service characterized as
honorable. The applicant was discharged on 10 Apr 07 by reason of
“Personality Disorder” with a Separation Code of “JFX” and a Reentry Code
(RE) of “2C.” She had served 1 year, 6 months and 14 days on active duty.
On 7 Feb 08, the applicant was notified by AFPC/DPSIT that corrections to
her DD Form 214, Block 14, reflecting the correct date of her basic
military training, her Enlisted Air Crew Undergraduate Course and Combat
Survival Training Course were accomplished.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states that evidence reflects that the
Physical Disability Division never received a referral to the PEB and
therefore could not have given the applicant a medical discharge. The
applicant’s follow-up medical care should be pursued through the Department
of Veterans Affairs as they are the responsible authority for service-
connected care. The complete AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant offers the alternative change of the narrative
reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. The BCMR Medical
Consultant states the applicant was diagnosed with an Anxiety Disorder and
a Learning Disability. Although she has reportedly encountered severe
traumatic stressors that could have resulted in PTSD, there is no evidence
of a resultant functional impairment during military service that would
warrant this as a basis for the applicant’s discharge. The BCMR Medical
Consultant is of the opinion that some confusion must have existed in
differentiating a Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and an Adjustment
Disorder. The applicant’s true diagnosis was Anxiety Disorder; however,
not severe enough to warrant an MEB, yet severe enough to result in
separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant opines there has been an error or
injustice in establishing the reason for the applicant’s discharge and
recommends consideration, in the interest of justice, for changing the
reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority; as it is more likely than
not that the applicant’s personality disorder diagnosis, has adversely
affected her employment opportunities. The complete BCMR Medical
Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial for a change in the RE code but supports a
change in the Narrative Reason for Separation which would provide some
relief to the applicant. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit
E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 30
Jun and 1 Aug 08 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting partial relief. In this
respect, the applicant is requesting her separation code and narrative
reason be changed. After reviewing the evidence of record, it appears the
applicant's narrative reason and separation code inaccurately reflects the
circumstances surrounding her discharge. As noted by the BCMR Medical
Consultant, some confusion existed in diagnosing her disorder; thereby
establishing an erroneous narrative reason for her discharge. In view of
this, and to preclude any further injustice to the applicant, we recommend
that the narrative reason for her separation and the corresponding
separation code be changed to reflect “Secretarial Authority.”
4. Notwithstanding the above, insufficient relevant evidence has been
provided showing the existence of an error or injustice regarding her RE
code. In our opinion, the RE code which was issued at the time of her
separation accurately reflects the circumstances of her separation and we
do not find this code to be in error or unjust. Therefore, we find no
compelling basis to grant this portion of her request. In regard to her
remaining request to have Block 14 of her DD Form 214 corrected, we note
that these corrections have been made by the office of primary
responsibility and the applicant has been advised of these corrections;
therefore, action by this Board is not required.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 10 April 2007, she was
discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1-2, (Secretarial
Authority) with a Separation Code of KFF.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00232
in Executive Session on 2 Oct 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Mr. James G. Neighbors, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007-03327 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Oct 07, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 15 Feb 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 26 Jun 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Jul 08.
Exhibit F. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jun 08 and 1 Aug 08.
ALAN A. BLOMGREN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-03327
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that she was discharged
on 10 April 2007 with a narrative reason for separation of "Secretarial
Authority" rather than "Personality Disorder," and a separation code of
"JFF" rather than "JFX."
JOE
G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air
Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02419
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02847
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02847 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for discharge and her reentry code (RE) be changed to allow her to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY1997 | BC 1997 03327
Furthermore, there was no indication of a mental condition at the time of her separation that warranted consideration through the disability evaluation system (DES). The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) makes the decision as to whether a member is to be processed through the DES, or when the member is determined medically disqualified for continued military service. In response, the applicants counsel provided additional medical documentation for review by the Board (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03327
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03679
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The DD Form 149 she submitted on 30 Oct 07, should include treatment and separation due to asthma and bilateral stress fractures. The BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The entry level separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4K, which denotes medically disqualified or pending medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB) be changed to a RE code that will allow her to reenlist without a waiver. On 27 March 2002, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03988 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure" to read "Administrative Separation." The complete DPSOS evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00462
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant (Exhibit C). This evaluation resulted in a diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.” She was recommended for involuntary separation under provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1, Mental Disorders. The Separation Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that provided HQ AFPC/DPPD determines the applicant’s reason for separation should remain...
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant (Exhibit C). This evaluation resulted in a diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.” She was recommended for involuntary separation under provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1, Mental Disorders. The Separation Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that provided HQ AFPC/DPPD determines the applicant’s reason for separation should remain...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03120
She provided no facts warranting changing the narrative reason for separation to “fulfillment of service” or a change to her RE code. Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26...