Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-02689A
Original file (BC-2006-02689A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02689
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  receive  supplemental  consideration  for  promotion  to  the  grade  of
colonel.

_________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on  24 Jan 07.   For
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding  his  request,  and
the rationale for the earlier decision by  the  Board,  see  the  Record  of
Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.

On 18 Dec 07, the applicant provided a letter to  the  AFBCMR  in  which  he
pointed out administrative  errors  in  the  letter  notifying  him  of  the
Board's decision.  It appears the applicant  believes  the  Boards  decision
may have been based on erroneous information.  The applicant  also  provided
additional  documentation  that  he  believes  should  be  included  in  his
selection records.  His complete submission, with attachments is at  Exhibit
G.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial.  DPSOO reviewed the  additional  documentation
submitted by the applicant and states the letter showing completion  of  Air
War College was completed after  his  below-the-zone  promotion  board;  and
documentation showing award of the  Distinguished  Flying  Cross  (DFC)  and
Bronze Star (BS) do not add  any  relevance  to  his  case.   No  additional
evidence has been submitted to substantiate his claim that the  DFC  and  BS
were not seen by the promotion board.  AFPC/DPSOO's complete  evaluation  is
at Exhibit H.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 20 Feb 08, a copy of the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response within 30  days.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After reconsideration of the applicant’s appeal along with  the  additional
documentation submitted in support of his request,  we  are  not  persuaded
that corrective action  is  warranted  in  this  case.   Therefore,  absent
persuasive evidence that his selection record contained material errors  or
that an injustice existed resulting in his nonselection for  promotion,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief  sought  in  this
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
02689 in Executive Session on 22 May 08, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
      Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 25 Jan 07, w/Exhibits.
      Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Dec 07, w/atchs.
      Exhibit H. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 13 Feb 08.
      Exhibit I. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 08.




                                             CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02689

    Original file (BC-2006-02689.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DFC and BS were approved prior to the FY 70 board, and no evidence was found to show the decorations were missing at the time he was considered for promotion to colonel. The applicant has not provided any documentation to show that the citations were not on file for his promotion boards to colonel. The applicant has not provided any evidence to substantiate that the decorations in question were not in his records at time he met the colonel’s boards.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00606

    Original file (BC-2006-00606.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant submits a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, dated 5 Feb 07, Certification of Military Service, dated February 2007 and copy of Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service, excerpts from his military personnel records and background information detailing 17 missions he participated in during WWII. There is no documentation, other than the applicant’s assertion, that he was being recommended for a DFC and promotion to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02835

    Original file (BC-2007-02835.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02835 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02929

    Original file (BC-2007-02929.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has not provided any documentation to support his contention that he should have been promoted to the grade of captain. There is nothing in the applicant’s record to show he was recommended for promotion, or that he was even eligible for promotion to the grade of captain. Since his record does not contain a complete copy of his efficiency reports, it cannot be verified what his efficiency rating would have been.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01625

    Original file (BC-2007-01625.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this regard, we note insufficient evidence was presented to show he was recommended for, or awarded, the DFC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02357

    Original file (BC-2007-02357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force has a policy of including post-September 11, 2001, deployment history on the Air Force Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) and not including pre-September 11, 2001 deployment history. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03393

    Original file (BC-2007-03393.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03393 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 30 Jan 07 Officer Performance Report (OPR) and his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with the corrected forms and his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2007A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01810

    Original file (BC-2010-01810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 8 January 2009 through 22 June 2009 be corrected (with the correct signature dates); and the corrected OPR be accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); and that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-00395-3

    Original file (BC-2005-00395-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00395 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05, 131.01 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: Mr. David P. Sheldon HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, she asks that her Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 8 Jun 03 through 4 Jun 04 be removed from her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01060

    Original file (BC-2009-01060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: It took significant time to get his officer performance report (OPR) and his promotion recommendation form (PRF) corrected, which diminished his chances for promotion by the Calendar Year 2003 (CY03) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, he feels the SSB process prejudices his IPZ record as an officer passed over several times, as well as the effects of...