Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01810
Original file (BC-2010-01810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01810 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 
8 January 2009 through 22 June 2009 be corrected (with the 
correct signature dates); and the corrected OPR be accepted for 
file in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); and that his 
corrected OSR be considered for promotion to the grade of major 
by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2009C 
(CY09C) Major Central Selection Board (CSB). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He should have received a change of rating official (CRO) report 
due to a permanent change of assignment (PCA) in June 2009. If 
the OPR would have been processed on time it would have captured 
his deployment in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) 
and been available for the promotion board’s consideration. His 
rating chain supports this correction, noting that a CRO was 
never generated. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the 
contested report, closing on 22 June 2009 and letters of support 
from his rating chain. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available records, the applicant’s OPR rendered for 
the period 8 January 2009 through 22 June 2009 was 
electronically signed on 9 May 2010. 

 

He was considered and nonselected by the CY09C Major CSB which 
convened on 9 November 2009. 

 

The applicant’s OPR profile of the last 10 reports follows: 

 


 PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 

 

 16 May 02 Training Report (TR) 

 19 Dec 02 TR 

 06 Apr 03 Meet Standards (MS) 

 01 Feb 04 MS 

 01 Feb 05 MS 

 01 Feb 06 MS 

 07 Jan 07 MS 

 07 Jan 08 MS 

 #07 Jan 09 MS 

 ##22 Jun 09 MS 

 

# Top report at the time he was considered and nonselected for 
promotion by the CY09C Major CSB. 

 

## Contested Report 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDEP defers the case to AFPC/DPSOO for consideration. 
The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation 
Reports Appeals Board (ERAB); however, since the OPR is already 
on file no action is required. The OPR in question is already 
in the applicant’s OSR and has been placed in the Automated 
Records Management System (ARMS); therefore, no action is 
required at this time. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOO, based on the DPSIDEP advisory, recommends SSB 
consideration by the CY09C Major CSB with inclusion of the 
corrected 22 June 2009 OPR in the applicant’s OSR. 

 

Based on the governing instructions, OPRs on extended active 
duty (EAD) officers are due at AFPC no later than 60 days 
following closeout of the report. The 22 June 2009 OPR should 
have been filed in the member’s OSR by 22 August 2009. However, 
the rater, additional rater, reviewer, and ratee electronically 
signed the OPR on 9 May 2010, after the 2 November 2009 board 
convening date. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 September 2010 for review and comment within 
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit E). 


 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action. The Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility (OPRs) have adequately addressed the issues 
presented by the applicant and we are in agreement with their 
opinion and recommendation. Therefore, we recommend the 
contested report be reaccomplished as recommended and the 
corrected report be considered by an SSB. In view of the above, 
we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent 
indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the 
AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report, rendered for the period 
8 January 2009 through 22 June 2009, was reaccomplished, 
printed, and physically signed by the rater in Section IV, the 
additional rater in Section V, the reviewer in Section VI, and 
the ratee in Section VIII on 28 October 2009, and that the 
corrected report was accepted for file in his Officer Selection 
Record on 29 October 2009. 

 

It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion to 
the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the 
Calendar Year 2009C Major Central Selection Board and any 
subsequent boards for which the above corrected OPR was not a 
matter of record. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01810 in Executive Session on 6 January 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDEP, dated 19 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 9 Aug 10. 


 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02391

    Original file (BC-2010-02391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02391 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2009C (CY09C) Major Central Selection Board (CSB), with the inclusion of his Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period of 29 September 2008 through 27...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03956

    Original file (BC-2012-03956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Evaluations Report Appeals Board (ERAB) granted his request to remove his OPR for 2008 from his record because a Change of Rater (CRO) OPR should have been accomplished. The reaccomplished report stratified him at “#1 of my 41 0-4s!” h. While there are no guarantees, the stratification in the reaccomplished OPR would have most likely ensured his promotion to lieutenant colonel. In fact, in an e-mail the applicant provided to the ERAB as evidence, the military deputy spoke with him and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01896

    Original file (BC-2008-01896.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPSOO evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were sent to the applicant on 29 Aug 08 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 6 Aug 08, w/atchs. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Aug 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00525

    Original file (BC-2012-00525.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His corrected Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 28 October 2008 thorough 27 October 2009 be reconsidered for supplemental promotion consideration by the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Line of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00784

    Original file (BC-2009-00784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00784 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant submitted two appeals for his OPRs closing out 25 March 2004 through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02422

    Original file (BC-2008-02422.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of the contested OPR, a copy of the reaccomplished report, AF IMT 709, Promotion Recommendation, and documentation associated with his Evaluation Reports Appeal board (ERAB) submission. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY07B (27 November 2007), Lieutenant Colonel CSB. Unfortunately for the applicant however, a December 2007 close-out date made the report ineligible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02834

    Original file (BC-2010-02834.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although, the applicant contends his Senior Rater omitted several items from the PRF, he has failed to provide documentation to prove this or submitted a reaccomplished PRF with support from the Senior Rater and the MLR President. The Senior Rater does not support the applicant’s request to change the report or upgrade the PRF to a “Definitely Promote” Recommendation. The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01473

    Original file (BC-2012-01473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the applicant filed another request to the ERAB on 19 October 2010 requesting the CY2009C PRF be removed and he be provided SSB consideration. The new PRF resurrects the same performance comments from the voided OPR and resulted in the same effect as if the original OPR and PRF were never removed. The senior rater used the PRF to make an end-run around the OPR process after the ERAB decision to void the evaluator’s original referral OPR and PRF.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01776

    Original file (BC-2010-01776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-01776 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 16 June 2004 through 15 June 2005 be removed from his record. Although the LOR memorandum itself was done correctly, the applicant states he did not receive a UIF. As of this date, this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00735

    Original file (BC-2010-00735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In Sep 06, he applied to the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Commanding Officer Selection Board; however, in Oct 06, his commander returned from the selection board and advised him that his name would not be on the list. In addition,...