Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01644
Original file (BC-2007-01644.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01644
            INDEX CODE:  110.02

            COUNSEL: VETERANS HEALTH CARE
                         CENTER

            HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  26 NOV 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His date of separation (DOS) be changed to September  1968  rather  than  26
September 1967.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He makes no contentions.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  copy  of  his  DD  Form
214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  22  September  1966  in  the
grade of airman basic.  He served as an Apprentice Fuel Specialist.   On  30
August 1967, applicant was notified  by  his  commander  of  his  intent  to
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the  provisions  of
AFM 39-12, chapter 2, section B, paragraph 2-15a  for  frequent  involvement
of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities.  The  specific
reasons for this action were as follows:

On 28 December 1966, applicant was tried  by  a  special  court-martial  for
larceny of an armed  forces  identification  card,  a  Tennessee  operator’s
license, a selective service system registration certificate, a receipt  for
a pair of trousers, and a pair of trousers  in  violation  of  Article  121,
UCMJ.  He was sentenced to a reduction in grade to airman basic.

On 9 January 1967, applicant received an Article 15 for  failure  to  repair
to his appointed place of duty, without proper authority on 3 January  1967.
 His punishment consisted of 14 days in correctional custody.

On 17 July 1967, applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for  failure
to repair to his appointed place of duty  without  proper  authority  on  or
about 26 June 1967, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ.

On 21 July 1967, applicant was placed on the Control Roster for misconduct.

On 9 August 1967, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to repair  to
his appointed place of duty, without proper authority  on  5  and  7  August
1967.  His punishment consisted of 30 days in correctional custody.

He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged receipt of  the
notification on that same date.  The applicant waived his right  to  consult
counsel and elected not to submit statements on his own behalf.  In a  legal
review of the case file, the staff judge advocate  found  the  case  legally
sufficient and recommended that he be discharged.  The  discharge  authority
concurred with the recommendations and directed that he be  discharged  with
a general discharge.  Applicant was discharged on  26  September  1967.   He
served 1 year and 5 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states based on  the  documentation  on
file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent  with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the  discharge  regulation.   The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.

Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors  or  injustices
that occurred in the discharge processing.  He provided no facts  warranting
a change to the effective date of his separation (26 September 1967).

The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 June 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  for  review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   After  a  thorough  review  of  the
evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we  are  of  the  opinion
that the applicant’s DOS is correct and the applicant has not  provided  any
evidence which would lead us to  believe  otherwise.   Therefore,  we  agree
with the office of primary responsibility and  adopt  its  rational  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
01644 in Executive Session on 26 July 2007, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

      Ms. B J White-Olson, Panel Chair
      Mr. Josephine L. Davis, Member
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 May 07, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 5 Jun 07.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jun 07.





                                   B J WHITE-OLSON
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01481

    Original file (BC-2007-01481.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01481 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 NOVEMBER 2008 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01022

    Original file (BC-2007-01022.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Dec 01, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general). On 8 Apr 03, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to honorable. White-Olson, Panel Chair Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007- 01022...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00455

    Original file (BC-2007-00455.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided no facts warranting change to his under honorable conditions (general) discharge The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his letter dated 1 Apr 07, the applicant requested an extension in order to reply to the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00277

    Original file (BC-2007-00277.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Furthermore, the discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00993

    Original file (BC-2007-00993.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00993 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed; however, it appears that his request is to have his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3D (second term or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00808

    Original file (BC-2007-00808.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00808 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to 4C. On 23 Feb 07, applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation, by reason of “Personality Disorder,” and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01414

    Original file (BC-2006-01414.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her narrative reason for separation be changed from “Misconduct” to “Pregnancy.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she first requested to be separated based on her pregnancy, her commander gave her the option to remain on active duty. On 7 Feb 06, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade her general discharge to honorable and change her RE code and reason and authority...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01293

    Original file (BC-2005-01293.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 April 1998, his commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge due to his failure in Alcohol Abuse Treatment. The applicant was discharged effective 3 May 1998 with a honorable characterization of service, a separation code of HPD (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure) and a reentry code of 2c (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge). On 20 June 2005, the Air Force Personnel Center Separations Branch issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00010

    Original file (BC-2006-00010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His case was presented before an evaluations officer who recommended that he be discharged from the Air Force and provided a general discharge. After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR GREGORY JOHNSON Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records Attachment: Record of Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00090

    Original file (BC-2007-00090.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00090 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 JUL 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow reentry into the military. As of...