Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01299
Original file (BC-2007-01299.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01299
            INDEX CODE:  108.07

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  27 OCT 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical  conditions,  degenerative  arthritis  of  the
back and knees, condition of the skeletal  system  for  his  bilateral  foot
bunions and heel spurs, shin splints, and right and  left  elbow  conditions
be assessed as combat related in order to  qualify  for  compensation  under
the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He trained constantly with  weapons,  digging  fox  holes,  firing  weapons,
jumping in and  out  of  foxholes,  building  defensive  fighting  positions
simulating war, and counter attacking simulated  attacks  on  stateside  and
overseas  bases.   He  conducted  base  recovery  after  attack.   This  was
completed by wearing a web belt with ammunition, gas  mask,  flak  vest  and
helmet, and handling a loaded M-16  rifle.   This  was  his  daily  required
equipment.  He also participated in training where he had  to  jump  out  of
moving vehicles.  He states the majority of his service  connected  injuries
stem from the brutal  physical  training  and  long  hours  of  standing  on
extremely hot and freezing surfaces.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal  statement  and
documentation associated with his CRSC application.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________






STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant entered active  duty  on  2  March  1977.   He  was  progressively
promoted to the grade of  technical  sergeant,  having  assumed  that  grade
effective and with a date of rank of  1 November  1993.   He  served  as  an
Electrical Systems Craftsman and Security Craftsman.  He was  relieved  from
active duty on 31 May 1997 and retired from the Air Force  on  1 June  1997,
having served 20 years and 3 days on active duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 50% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 25 January 2005 based upon the  fact
that his service-connected medical conditions  were  determined  not  to  be
combat-related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.   DPPD  states  the  fact  that  the  applicant
incurred these disabilities while  on  active  duty  is  not  sufficient  to
support  approval  for  CRSC.   To  be  eligible  for  compensation,   clear
documentation must be provided  to  indicate  an  injury  occurred  and  was
caused  by  a  combat-related  factor  rather  than  from   sports   related
incidents, moving furniture, falling out  of  trucks,  or  falling  on  ice.
While the applicant’s conditions  meet  the  VA  requirements  for  service-
connected  compensation,  the   evidence   does   not   support   additional
compensation under CRSC.

The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states his injuries are  a  direct
result of 13  years  of  rigorous  and  constant  physical  abuse  from  the
security specialist career field.  It was the constant physical  abuse  that
created and caused his injuries.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The available evidence of record does  not
support  a  finding  that  the  service-connected  medical  conditions   the
applicant believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result  of
armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the  performance  of
duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of  war;
and, therefore, do not qualify for compensation  under  the  CRSC  Act.   We
agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
01299 in Executive Session on 2 November 2007, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 April 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 19 June 2007.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 July 2007.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 1 August 2007.





                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00131

    Original file (BC-2007-00131.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00131 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 JUL 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of the spine, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01699

    Original file (BC-2005-01699.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01699 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, limited motion of the lumbar spine, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00904

    Original file (BC-2007-00904.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. The vehicle was being used to transport personnel and baggage at the time; it was not being used for its intended military purpose as a weapons carrier. In addition, the available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01299

    Original file (BC-2005-01299.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01299 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of the knees, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01741

    Original file (BC-2007-01741.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01741 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 DEC 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, residuals of foot injury, both feet and traumatic arthritis of the right knee, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02997

    Original file (BC-2006-02997.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02997 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 APR 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition, asthma, and impairment of the femur, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02048

    Original file (BC-2006-02048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states the applicant believes his back condition is directly related to performing aircrew duties. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01528

    Original file (BC-2004-01528.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01528 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 NOV 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and right knee bone condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03562

    Original file (BC-2004-03562.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his shoulder condition, limited motion in cervical spine and back condition are not combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04103

    Original file (BC-2007-04103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not qualify...