RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00796
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2B, Discharged
under General or other-than-honorable conditions, to 1A, Ineligible to
reenlist, but condition waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During his time in the Air Force he had adjustment problems. He was
away from home for the first time and made bad judgments based on his
adjustment problems and his mother’s illness. He was never arrested
or in corrective custody. He admits to not listening to his fellow
airmen or the Non Commissioned Officers (NCO’s) over him. He was 19
and homesick and did not know how to adjust to military life. He is
now 27 years old and in great physical and mental health. While
others are afraid to enlist because of Iraq, he is attempting to
reenter the service. Everyone makes mistakes and his leaving the Air
Force was the biggest mistake he has ever made. He is hoping for a
second chance to serve.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a personal
statement.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 January 1999. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman with a date of rank of
13 July 1999. On 3 August 1999, he received a letter of reprimand
(LOR) for using threatening language. On 9 March 2000, he received an
Article 15 for wrongfully opening and stealing compact disc games from
certain mail. His punishment was reduction to airman basic and
forfeiture of $200 per month for two months. On 10 May 2000, he
received another Article 15 for being absent without leave and
disobeying a lawful order to report his status. His punishment was
restriction to base for 45 days and 45 days extra duty. He received a
General discharge for Misconduct – Minor Disciplinary Infractions on
28 July 2000 after having served for 1 year, 6 months, and 16 days.
The AFDRB initially reviewed and denied his request to change his
discharge and his RE code to one that would allow him to reenlist on
27 August 2002. On 8 December 2003, the AF Discharge Review Board
(AFDRB) reviewed his request again and again decided to deny his
request.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states the documentation on file
in his master personnel records shows his discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation. The discharge was within the power of the discharge
authority. Further, the applicant did not submit any evidence or
identify any errors or injustices that occurred during his discharge.
He provided no facts warranting a change to his under honorable
conditions (general) discharge or RE code.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states they considered documents
submitted by the applicant and conducted a review of his personnel
record that ultimately revealed no evidence to support the course of
action requested by the applicant.
DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded
that his uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force.
Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden of having suffered either an error or injustice. The
discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing AFI and we
find no evidence to indicate that his separation from the Air Force
was anything but appropriate. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00796 in Executive Session on 14 June 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
Mr. Michael F. McGhee, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Mar 07, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Mar 07
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 16 Apr 07
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Apr 07.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01424
The AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the requested relief be approved. DPPAE states based on the applicant’s reason for separation, relief should be granted in recoupment of the unearned portion of his bonus. After a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel record and documentation provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded his SPD code should be changed to one that would not require the recoupment of the unearned portion of his IEB.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00460
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00460 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and her under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded. On 5 September 1990, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review...
In his 13 years of service, he never received an Article 15 or any such reprimands. The application was timely filed. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 3 Apr 01, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01549
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01549 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 17 November 1997, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending him...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02291
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 17 August 2001, the applicant was notified of his commander's intent to initiate discharge action against him for conditions that interfere with military service, more specifically, an Adjustment Disorder with mixed emotional features, Mixed Receptive - Expressive Language disorder, Reading Disorder, and for misconduct, more specifically, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. After consulting with counsel, applicant requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01079
He believes there is no reason he should not be allowed to reenlist into another service component. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. JAMES W. RUSSELL, III Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00674
(b) On 10 August 1986, received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to call his duty section as directed. On 18 December 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) approved applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable; however, his request for a change of RE code was denied. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02057
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his discharge from “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” to “Honorable,” his reentry code and narrative reason for separation should be changed to allow him to re-enter active military service. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. The DPPAE...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02370
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02370 INDEX CODE: 110.02 xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of “2B” (Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge) and Separation Code of “JFF” (Secretarial Authority) be changed. On 10 August 1999,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00456
The board of officers recommended that applicant be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 11 July 1951, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his under honorable conditions (general) discharge upgraded to honorable. Exhibit B.