Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00470
Original file (BC-2007-00470.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-00470
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
                       COUNSEL:  None

                       HEARING DESIRED:  No

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 AUGUST 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect service credit for his  assignment
to Indochina and temporary duties (TDYs) to Vietnam and Thailand.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was stationed in China  and  had  numerous  TDYs  in  Thailand  and
Vietnam.

He wants credit for serving in Vietnam in order  to  receive  benefits
from the Department of Veterans Affairs and to claim exposure to Agent
Orange.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  copy  of  his  DD
Form 214, Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support  of
Claim) and a letter from the Pinellas County Human  Services  Veterans
Services.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 February 1969, as
a airman basic for a period of four years.

The applicant's records reflect he was stationed  in  Taiwan  from  18
August 1969 through 18 August 1971.

The applicant was honorably released from  active  duty  on  3 January
1973.  He served a total of 3 years, 10 months and
20 days on active duty.  His DD Form 214 reflects he served two  years
of foreign service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends the requested relief be denied.  DPAPP states
there is no documentation in the applicant’s records that reflects  he
was TDY to Vietnam or Thailand.  Furthermore, none of his  performance
reports make any reference regarding TDYs to Vietnam or Thailand.

AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
18 May 2007, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice.  In the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00470 in  Executive  Session  on  5  September  2007,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
                 Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, 28 Jan 07, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 May 07.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 May 2007.




                                  JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                                  Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02264

    Original file (BC-2007-02264.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is now finding out that various VA benefits are predicated upon actual in-country Vietnam service, even though he was awarded a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for his Southeast Asia (SEA) service and his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02277

    Original file (BC-2007-02277.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02277 INDEX CODE: 100.07, 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), credit for Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam, completion of J60 Engine formal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01395

    Original file (BC-2007-01395.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01395 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1966. There are no documents in his records that support his claim that he was TDY to Vietnam. In applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01224

    Original file (BC-2005-01224.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPAPP on 9 June 2005 requested the applicant provide documentation showing he was TDY to Ubon, Thailand. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP states there is no documentation in the applicant’s records that reflect he was TDY to Ubon, Thailand. The applicant's records do not reflect that he was TDY to Ubon, Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01571

    Original file (BC 2013 01571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In 1968, he went TDY to Kadena AFB, Japan for six months. While the applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect service in Thailand; in accordance with Department of Defense directives, the DD Form 214 will not be reissued or amended to reflect specific locations served in an AOR. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00555

    Original file (BC-2007-00555.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states there are no documents in the applicant’s records that verify he was in Vietnam or Saudi Arabia. The DPAPP complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 3 July 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and comment within 30 days. There are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel record which reflect he served in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02961

    Original file (BC-2005-02961.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02961 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 MAR 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect he served in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The applicant’s contentions are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00933

    Original file (BC-2011-00933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provides additional information to support the fact that he was stationed at the bomb dump on Udorn AFB Thailand and requests that his case be confirmed as correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission, his most recent submission, dated 13 Dec 11, in judging the merits of the case; however, we...