Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00235
Original file (BC-2007-00235.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-00235
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  28 JUL 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His bad conduct discharge be upgraded.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He desires his discharge upgraded, not because it was  unjust,  but  because
he was immature during the contested time period and now sees the errors  in
his ways.  He  states  he  has  contacted  Hepatitis  C  and  needs  medical
benefits.  He further states he has changed his life around  and  now  helps
others with drug addiction.

In support of  his  request,  the  applicant  provided  character  reference
letters.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 February 1985 in the  grade
of  airman  basic.   He  served  as  an  Apprentice  Aircrew  Life   Support
Specialist.

On 30 July 1986, the applicant, pled guilty before a  General  Court-Martial
to one specification of wrongful  possession  of  cocaine  in  violation  of
Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).   The  sentenced  was
adjudged on 5 June 1986.  The applicant  was  sentenced  to  a  bad  conduct
discharge, confinement for three months, a forfeiture of $350.00  per  month
for three months, and a reduction in grade from airman to airman basic.   On
21 August 1987, applicant was discharged.  He served 2 years, 6 months,  and
16 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial.  JAJM states  the  application  has  not  been
timely filed.  Applicant provides no reason why the Board should excuse  the
late filing in the interest of justice.  The application is also  meritless.
 The applicant does not contend that any specific actions  have  been  taken
by reviewing authorities that require correction of his record.   Thus,  any
decision regarding his  discharge  status  must  be  done  as  a  matter  of
clemency.  He sets forth no basis for  clemency;  however,  except  that  he
would like the medical benefits attendant to an honorable discharge  due  to
contracting Hepatitis C, which he apparently contracted post-discharge  (his
Air Force medical records do not indicate hepatitis).   Further,  while  his
recent service  to  others  is  laudable,  it  does  not  suggest  that  his
discharge should be upgraded.  His period of military service was brief  and
his  present  medical  problems  not  related  to  his   military   service.
Moreover, the abuse of illegal  drugs  is  a  serious  crime.   As  such,  a
general court-martial was  an  appropriate  forum.   In  choosing  to  plead
guilty, the applicant knew full well the possible  punishment  (the  maximum
was five years confinement, forfeiture of all  pay  and  allowances,  and  a
dishonorable discharge).  Given the sentence he received,  there  is  little
basis for clemency.

The JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 9 March 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  for  review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of  an  error  or  injustice.   We  agree  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Military Justice  Division  and  adopt  the  rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has  not  been  a
victim of either an error or injustice.  While it  is  commendable  that  he
has  changed  his  life  around  and  now  helps  others  to  overcome  drug
addiction, we are not persuaded by the evidence submitted  that  an  upgrade
to his characterization of service is warranted.  It appears  the  applicant
is requesting  his  discharge  be  upgraded  in  order  to  receive  medical
benefits  through  the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA).   We   are
compelled to note that in accordance with statutory guidelines, because  the
applicant was discharged by sentence of a General  Court-Martial,  of  which
this Board has no authority to change, he would remain  ineligible  for  DVA
benefits.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the  contrary,  we  find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
00235 in Executive Session on 12 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                 Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
                 Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Jan 07, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 26 Feb 07.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Mar 07.




                 KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
                 Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00415

    Original file (BC-2009-00415.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Feb 83, the Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and approved the sentence as adjudged, although it reassessed the sentence and found appropriate only so much of the sentence that extended to a BCD, confinement for two months, forfeiture of $125.00 pay per month for four months and reduction to the grade of E-1. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02328

    Original file (BC-2006-02328.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02328 INDEX CODE: 105.01 COUNSEL: JOHN N. PAGE III HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in appellate leave status to complete his General Court- Martial (GCM) appeal process from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) to the Court of Appeals...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00082

    Original file (BC-2010-00082.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received a BCD after trying to get the Air Force to help him with an addiction. However, he was not provided the proper treatment for an opiate addiction and shortly after asking for and not receiving the proper help began writing prescriptions for Oxycodone. The applicant was able to relate in his unsworn statement his contention that he self-referred for help with his addiction and that the Air Force did not give him proper treatment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04124

    Original file (BC 2007 04124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 March 2002, the applicant was discharged with a BCD. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00540

    Original file (BC-2007-00540.Doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00540 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFLOA/JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00235

    Original file (BC-2010-00235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the applicant has provided no documentation showing a pending larceny charge. The JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 May 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03053

    Original file (BC-2012-03053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. JAJM states upgrading the applicant’s BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00767

    Original file (BC-2010-00767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 March 2007, the sanity board concluded that at the time of the applicant’s alleged offenses, he suffered from severe mental disorders but was able to appreciate the nature and wrongfulness of his conduct. The military judge found the applicant guilty of wrongfully using marijuana and sentenced him to four months confinement and reduction to airman basic. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03827

    Original file (BC-2006-03827.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After almost 10 years, he deserves a chance at a successful life and a general discharge. On 21 October 1997, he pled guilty and was sentenced by a general court- martial for, between on or about 8 June 1997, and on or about 16 June 1997, wrongfully using cocaine. Title 10, United States Code, limits the Board’s ability to correct records relating to courts-martial to correction of a record to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01693

    Original file (BC-2007-01693.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01693 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Specifically, Section 1552 permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform...