RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01626
INDEX CODE: 137.01, 137.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased ex-husband’s records be corrected to show that he elected
former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her ex-husband’s records should reflect her as the former spouse and
beneficiary as ordered in their divorce decree. She was not informed
by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to submit a
deemed election even after she submitted the Divorce Decree which
ordered that she remain the beneficiary of the SBP. She contacted
DFAS several times after the divorce to ensure she was still the
beneficiary and was reassured that she remained the eligible
beneficiary.
In support of her request, applicant provided a personal response, a
copy of an Obituary, a copy of her deceased ex-husband's Certificate
of Death, and a copy of their Final Divorce Decree.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The deceased former member and the applicant married on 12 Feb 57, and
the former member elected spouse and child SBP coverage, based on full
retired pay prior to his 1 Sep 80 retirement. The parties divorced on
1 Aug 89, and the divorce decree ordered that the applicant remain the
designated SBP beneficiary; however, neither submitted a valid
election change during the required time limit. Defense Enrollment
Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show the former member
remarried on 3 Sep 93, but he did not request that DFAS establish SBP
coverage on his second wife’s behalf. The youngest child lost
eligibility in Jun 94. The former member’s retired pay records
erroneously reflected the applicant’s date of birth as the eligible
spouse beneficiary and SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay
until his 9 Jan 07 death. His widow is eligible to receive an SBP
annuity of $1,010.00, but she has not yet applied for the benefit.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRT has no recommendation. DPPRT states, based on the
AFBCMR’s 18 Mar 04 guidance, they are forwarding this request without
a recommendation, because it involves two potential SBP beneficiaries.
The DPPTR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
The SAF/MRBC Legal Advisor recommends denial. The Legal Advisor
states in part, that despite the 1989 court order directing the former
member to make the election, federal law makes the election
unavailable when the deemed election is not effected. The applicant
claims that she was not aware of this requirement and discussed her
SBP status with DFAS on several occasions before she learned of the so-
called deemed election requirement. She also mentions her poor health
and financial condition and the fact that she paid the SBP premium for
many years. If there were not a competing eligible beneficiary, or
that beneficiary would consent to the change via a notarized
statement, he would recommend correcting the record. But there is no
extraordinary circumstances here that would support not enforcing the
deemed election requirement given the fact correcting the record in
the manner requested will deprive the former member’s current spouse
of benefits to which she is legally entitled. He reminds the Board
that if it is inclined to grant the relief, it should not reach a
final decision until the view of the current spouse is solicited and
considered.
The Legal Advisor’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that the additional documentation she provided
should make it easier for the Board to understand her point of view.
She also states that from 1980 until his death her deceased ex-husband
paid the SBP premiums in lieu of spousal support, and thereafter, she
paid the premiums. She provides a personal statement, copies of
checks, documentation pertaining to spousal support payments, and
background information related to their divorce proceedings.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D
The deceased member’s widow provided a notarized statement stating in
part, that she and her deceased husband had an understanding that the
ex-wife (who is the applicant), would receive the SBP benefits. Upon
finding out that the ex-wife has not received the SBP benefits, she
was asked to consent to having the beneficiary changed from her name
to the ex-wife. She does so, only if other benefits or entitlements
are not jeopardized by this consent.
The complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
Notwithstanding the opinions rendered by the SAF/MRBC Legal Advisor
and HQ USAF/JAA, after thoroughly reviewing the circumstances of this
case, it is the opinion of the Board that the former spouse should
receive the SBP annuity. The Board notes the current spouse has
provided a notarized statement relinquishing her entitlement to the
SBP. The Board is persuaded it was the applicant’s intent to provide
his former spouse the SBP annuity and is satisfied his current spouse
is fully aware she is relinquishing her entitlement to the SBP
annuity. In view of the above and the absence of persuasive evidence
to the contrary, the board recommends granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 August 1989, he
elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
based on full retired pay, naming DONNA G. RYAN, as the former spouse
beneficiary.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-
01626 in Executive Session on 18 December 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 May 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 11 Jul 07.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Oct 07, w/atchs
Exhibit D. Letter, Appicant, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, Spouse, dated 23 Nov 07, w/atch.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-01626
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 August 1989, he
elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
based on full retired pay, naming, FORMER SPOUSE, as the former spouse
beneficiary.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307
If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02857
Neither party submitted a valid election change during the required time limit following their divorce. The complete SAF/MRB Legal Advisors evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants counsel states that paragraph 13; page 20 of the divorce decree shows the deceased member acknowledged his obligation by submitting this as an election for SBP for his spouse. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02192
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02192 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________ __ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouses records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The service member elected spouse only coverage under the SBP at full retirement pay. Since the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00647
In the latter case, the former spouse must provide legal documentation that the member agreed, or that the court ordered the member, to establish former spouse coverage. The Agency Legal Advisor recommends denial indicating that despite the Feb 03 court order directing the applicant to make the election, federal law makes the election unavailable when the deemed election is not timely effected. Accordingly, he sees no extraordinary circumstances here that would support not enforcing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02010
There is no evidence the member submitted a valid former spouse election within one year following their divorce. The Legal Advisor states the widow became the SBP beneficiary by operation of law when the member died in Jun 05 and is currently receiving SBP payments. We note the opinion and recommendation of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor that as an operation of law the member’s spouse is the legal beneficiary unless a legally effective election or deemed election (pursuant to a court order)...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062
She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicants coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00962 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant is the ex-spouse of the deceased former servicemember, who requests her former late husband’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003158
The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. Her former spouse's SBP election was then changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. On 16 December 2014, by letter, DFAS informed the applicant that after a review of the FSM's pay records, it was determined that the wording in the divorce decree was insufficient to establish that the court...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001066
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant contends the records of her deceased former spouse should be corrected to show that he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to...