Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02584
Original file (BC-2006-02584.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

      IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02584
            INDEX CODE:  110.02
      XXXXXXX                     COUNSEL:  NONE

                                  HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  28 FEBUARY 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

A  one  time  drug  incident  and  poor  legal  representation  led  to  his
unjustified discharge.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 28 July 1981 in the grade  of  airman
basic.  On 12 April 1984, his  commander  preferred  court  martial  charges
against him for use  and  possession  of  cocaine.   On  24  May  1984,  the
applicant requested he be discharged from the Air Force in lieu of trial  by
court martial.  On 1 June 1984, his commander recommended he  be  discharged
from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR  39-10,  Chapter  4,  Request
for Discharge in Lieu of Trial by  Court-Martial.   On  29  June  1984,  the
General  Court-Martial  Authority  approved  the  request  to  separate  the
applicant in lieu of court-martial with  an  (UOTHC)  discharge.   Applicant
was advised of his rights in this matter.  In a legal  review  of  his  case
the base legal office found it legally sufficient and recommended  an  UOTHC
discharge.  On 9 July 1984, he was discharged from  the  Air  Force  in  the
grade of airman first class.  He served 2 years, 11 months  and  9  days  on
active duty.

Pursuant to the Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,
provided an investigation report on 8 November 2006 for review and response
within 14 days and to date no response has been received. (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states based  on  the  documentation on
file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of  the  discharge regulation.   The
discharge  was  within  the  discretion  of  the  discharge authority;   the
applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors  or  injustices
that occurred in the discharge processing.

The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states he and his wife were giving a party at an  off-base  tavern
after he received orders to Germany.  Applicant states cocaine was  consumed
during the party; however, after he and his wife left the tavern,  they  did
not have any  drugs  or  drug  paraphernalia.   In  addition,  investigators
searched their apartment and did not found any drugs or drug paraphernalia.

His complete response is at Exhibit F.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.   After  careful  consideration  of  the
available evidence, we found no indication that the actions taken to  affect
his discharge were improper or contrary to the provisions of  the  governing
regulations in effect at the time, or that the  actions  taken  against  the
applicant were based on factors other than his own  misconduct.   Therefore,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  BC-2006-02584  in  Executive
Session on 28 November 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Judith B. Oliva, Member
                 Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 August 2006, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Report, dated, 13 October 2006
    Exhibit D.  AFPC/DPPRS Letter, dated 11 September 2006.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 October 2006.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, not dated.




            CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
            Panel Chair
                         DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
                                WASHINGTON DC


[pic]


Office of the Assistant Secretary

AFBCMR
1535 Command Drive EE Wing 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002

XXXXXXX

XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX,

Dear XXXXXXX

      Reference your application, submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603 (Section 1552, 10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-02584.

      After careful consideration of your application and the former
member’s available military records, the Board determined that the evidence
you presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error
or injustice.  Accordingly, the Board denied your application.

      You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for
consideration by the Board.  In the absence of such additional evidence, a
further review of your application is not possible.

      BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR




                       GREGORY E. JOHNSON
                       Chief Examiner
                       Air Force Board for Correction
                       of Military Records


Attachment:
Record of Board Proceedings






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02454

    Original file (BC-2006-02454.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02454 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable discharge. He provided no facts warranting an upgrade of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03412

    Original file (BC-2006-03412.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the documentation in the applicant's file, they believe his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). After thoroughly reviewing the evidence or record, we find no evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or unjust.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02681

    Original file (BC-2006-02681.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02681 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason (Misconduct-Drug Use) for his 1983 honorable discharge be removed from his DD Form 214. On 18 Nov 83, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01588

    Original file (BC-2006-01588.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 12 June 1985, applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting her UOTHC discharge to be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFDRB considered all the evidence of record and concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02856

    Original file (BC-2006-02856.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    18405TA3, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, they conclude that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that the applicant did not identify any errors or injustices in the discharge processing. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02943

    Original file (BC-2006-02943.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 September 1988, the applicant after consulting with legal counsel, applied for discharge in lieu of further action under the provisions of AFR 36-2 and waived his right to a hearing before of Board of Inquiry (BOI). The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his UOTHC discharge upgraded to honorable and change of reason for discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03635

    Original file (BC-2006-03635.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His punishment consisted of reduction in rank to the grade of airman basic (AB) (E-1) and restriction to the base for 60 days. On 11 February 1987, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend him for discharge for misconduct under the authority of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-10, paragraph 5-47b and 5-49c, with a general discharge. The discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged without probation or rehabilitation with a general (under honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1998-02167

    Original file (BC-1998-02167.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial indicating based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. On 9 May 2005, the Board staff...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03790

    Original file (BC-2006-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was discharged on 12 Jun 87, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request on 24 Jan 07, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03212

    Original file (BC-2006-03212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03212 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 APRIL 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) in 1995 and 1996 to have his...