RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01943
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE 27 OCT 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The character of his discharge (Dishonorable) be changed and his pay grade
be restored to enable him to retire.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is now 71 years old and had open heart surgery in 1995. He states that
he committed the act for which he was convicted in self-defense and in
defense of another person.
In support of his application, he submits a several copies of his DD Form
214s, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and other
documents.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the regular Air Force on 26 June 1956 and was
progressively promoted to the rank of staff sergeant with a date of rank of
1 June 1966. The applicant was tried by General Court Martial (GCM) and
found guilty on 7 September 1973 of unpremeditated murder of another
military member by means of stabbing with a knife. He was sentenced to a
dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction in
grade to E-1, and confinement at hard labor for 15 years. The convening
authority approved so much of the sentence as provided for dishonorable
discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E-1, and
confinement at hard labor for 10 years.
He was discharged on 7 January 1976 with a dishonorable discharged. He was
credited with 19 years, 7 months and 17 days of active duty service.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigation Report pertaining to
the applicant, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. The AFBCMR’s ability to correct records
related to courts-martial is limited. Specifically, section 1552(f)(1)
permits correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing
authorities under the UCMJ. Additionally, section 1552(f)(2) permits
correction of records related to action on the sentence of a court-martial
for the purpose of clemency. Apart from these two limited exceptions, the
effect of section 1552(f) is that the AFBCMR is without authority to
reverse, set aside, or otherwise expunge a court-martial conviction that
occurred on or after 5 May 1950(the effective date of the UCMJ).
The applicant’s discharge accurately reflects the character of his service.
The sentence was well within legal limits and the convening authority
determines it to be a fitting punishment for the offense committed. The
sentence was found appropriate for the offenses and the requested relief, a
restoration of the applicant’s previous pay grade, is inappropriate given
the seriousness of the applicant’s crime and discharge.
JAJM states the applicant has failed to identify the existence of any error
or injustice related to his court-martial and resulting sentence. He
provides no evidence to warrant upgrading his discharge. Therefore, JAJM
recommends the Board deny relief because the applicant does not demonstrate
an equitable basis for relief.
AFLOA/JAJM’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends denial. DPPRRP states the applicant had an approved
retirement date of 1 December 1973 at which time he would have had 20 years
and 28 days of active service for retirement. Retirement orders (SO AC-
4652) were issued on 16 February 1973 but were rescinded on 20 April 1973
by (SO AC-12521). Both orders were rescinded by SO AC-34085 due to the
member being placed on administrative hold.
The AF Form 1226, Record of Court-Martial Convictions and Time Lost, shows
the applicant was in confinement from 4 July 1973 to 17 January 1974 at
Ramstein, transferred to Fort Leavenworth confinement facility from 18
January 1974 to 6 January 1976, and was dishonorably discharged on 7
January 1976.
The law that governs retirement of an enlisted member, in 1973, 1976 and
today is 10 USC, section 8914 which requires an enlisted member of the Air
Force to have at least 20 years Total Active Federal Military Service
(TAFMS) in order to qualify for retirement. The applicant did not fulfill
the required 20 years TAFMS because all time from 4 July 1973 to 7 January
1976 was lost time. Under 10 USC, section 8925(b), lost time is not
computed for the voluntary retirement of an enlisted member.
AFPC/DPPRRP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28
July 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
On 22 August 2004 a copy of the Federal Bureau of Investigation report was
forwarded to the applicant. As of this date, this office has received no
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no
evidence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note that the
applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air
Force Instruction in effect at the time of his separation. The applicant
was afforded all the rights to which entitled and the general court-martial
findings were affirmed by the United States Air Force Court of Criminal
Appeals. The applicant's contentions are duly noted; however, we do not
find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force Military Justice Division.
The Military Justice Division has adequately addressed the issues of this
case and we agree with their opinions and adopt the rationale expressed as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his
burden that his separation was inappropriate. There being insufficient
evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-01943
Executive Session on 26 September 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2006-
01943 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jun 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Investigation Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 11 July 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 18 Jul 06.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 06.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Aug 06
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04685
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force erroneously cancelled his approved retirement when he was placed under investigation prior to his retirement date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01160
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01160 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Dishonorable Discharge be upgraded to a discharge that would qualify him for Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. Specifically, Section 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00803
DPPRRP states the DD Form 214 records a member’s actual TAFMS so, because the applicant did not actually serve on active duty from 1-3 October 1977, his DD Form 214 does not require a correction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01441 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The applicant requests an upgrade of the character of his service. The AFLOA/JAJM...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01117
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01117 INDEX CODE: 106 .00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Oct 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 2004 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the application be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01146
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01146 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCT 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He request clemency and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01252
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The evidence used by his commander for the Article 15 was inadmissible because the evidence was obtained as a result of an illegal search. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial and states, in part, that Article 15 punishment should be set aside only when the evidence presented in the application demonstrates a material...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01340
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01340 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 NOVEMBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01170
In his rebuttal, the applicant also requests pay and allowances he never received during his confinement (Exhibit E). JAJM notes the applicant is not contending that any specific actions have been taken by reviewing authorities that require correction of his record. The complete DFAS evaluation, with attachments is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: In his response dated 10 Apr 07, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01595
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01595 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 11, under the...