RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01471
INDEX CODE: 126.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 NOVEMBER 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The remainder of his Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Joint
Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) be waiver; amend his
promotion effective date to captain to from 1 January 2005 to
31 May 2004 and receive back pay based on this date; and the Article 15,
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) be expunged from all his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is currently serving an ADSC for JSUPT until November 16, 2011. However,
on 9 May 2003, he was medically disqualified from flying due to alcohol
abuse beyond his control. Thankfully, he has since been rehabilitated,
however, he is no longer flying. Since he is no longer flying, he is
requesting the remainder of his ADSC be waived. He committed freely without
any reservation to 10 years of flying, but extenuating circumstances exist
which warrant special consideration. Direct requests to AFPC were answered
with a suggestion to apply for a correction via this Board. Colleagues of
his have successfully lobbied this Board for similar ADSC waivers, so he
knows it is possible. The current Force Shaping program is waiving other
ADSCs, however, he is not eligible. He has no plans to separate from the
Air Force, but would like the freedom to make that choice. Due to the
nature of his disqualification there is no chance to take the Air Force
training he received to the civilian flying community.
In support of his request, applicant provides a personal letter, emails,
pay schedule, letters of recommendation, and OERs.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of captain
with a date of rank of 31 May 2004.
The applicant attended and graduated JSUPT on 16 November 2001. He
acknowledged receipt of the ADSC on a Statement of Agreement dated 7
December 1999 and on Air Force Form 63 dated 16 November 2000. He was later
medically disqualified from flying status due to alcoholism.
The applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to captain by
the CY03B captain promotion board. A Promotion Recommendation Form with a
Do Not Promote (DNP) recommendation was prepared on the applicant. The
reason for the DNP recommendation was that the applicant demonstrated poor
judgment, drank to excess at deployed location, made a public spectacle of
himself, was abusive to two enlisted members, committed conduct unbecoming
of an officer, demonstrated immature officer ship and punished pursuant to
Article 15, UCMJ.
On 22 October 2002, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment for a
violation of Article 134, UCMJ, for being drunk and disorderly on 28-29
September 2002. His punishment was forfeiture of $1,375 pay per month for
two months and a reprimand.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, stating nonjudicial punishment is permitted
by Article 15, UCMJ, and governed by the Manual for Courts-Martial and Air
Force Instruction 51-202, Nonjudicial Punishment. The applicant's commander
determined Article 15 action was warranted. The applicant waived his right
to be tried by court-martial and chose instead to accept Article 15
proceedings, placing the determination of guilt or innocence, as well as
punishment, in his commander's hands. He acknowledges that the guilty
finding was correct. There is no new evidence sufficient to justify
overturning the commander's decision.
AFLO/JAJM's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSCES recommends denial and states AFI 36-2107, Active Duty
Commitments, Table 1.1, Rule 10 states that the ADSC incurring event for
JSUPT is 10 years. Applicant has an ADSC of 16 November 2011 base on his
completion of JSUPT. Since the applicant still maintains a secondary AFSC
of 11M2F (KC-135 Mobility Pilot), he must serve the service commitment. The
applicant may request a waiver of his ADSC in conjunction with separation
IAW 36-3207 or as an exception to Air Force policy. The applicant did not
provide sufficient justification to support his request.
AFPC/DPSCES’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D
AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial and states based on AFLOA/JAJM's findings, and
the fact that there is no convincing data demonstrating that a material
error or injustice existed in the member's record, they recommend the
AFBCMR deny his request for an earlier DOR to captain. Without an earlier
DOR and effective date, there is no entitlement to any back pay and
allowances.
AFPC/DPPPO's complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
AFPC/JA recommends denial and states retaining in his Air Force record
those entries that capture the applicant's misbehavior does not rise to
that level. On the contrary, that behavior constituted a serious criminal
breach, and the judicial and administration actions subsequently taken in
response thereto were entirely commensurate with the offense. We recommend
that those matters of record not be disturbed.
AFPC/JA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18
August 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We find no evidence of error in this case
and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation provided in support of his
appeal, we do not believe he has suffered an injustice. In cases of this
nature, we are not inclined to disturb the judgments of commanding officers
absent a strong showing of abuse of discretionary authority. We have no
such showing here. The evidence of record indicates that during the
processing of the Article 15 action, the applicant was afforded every right
to which he was entitled, he was represented by counsel, waived his right
to demand trial by court-martial, and submitted matters for review by the
imposing commander and appellate authority. After considering the matters
raised by the applicant, the commander determined that he had committed the
offense alleged and imposed punishment. Persuasive evidence has not been
provided which would lead us to believe that the imposing commander or the
reviewing authority abused their discretionary authority, that his
substantial rights were violated during the processing of the Article 15
punishment, or that the punishment exceeded the maximum authorized by the
UCMJ. In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
4. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has been
presented to demonstrate the existence of an error with respect to the
contested JSUPT ADSC. In this respect, the Board notes the applicant
received an Article 15 due to his own misconduct and was medically
disqualification from flying as a pilot. The commander determined the
information should be permanently filed in the applicant's Officer HQ USAF
Selection and the Officer Command Selection Records. Based upon the
defamatory information contained in the applicant's officer performance
report, his medically disqualification to be utilized as a pilot in any Air
Force aircraft and the Force Shaping Program, future promotion
considerations could be significantly effected. In light of the above, the
Board feels it is in the best interest of the Air Force to waive his JSUPT
ADSC. Therefore, we believe any doubt in this matter should be resolved in
favor of the applicant and recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his Active Duty Service Commitment
(ADSC) of 16 November 2011, incurred as a result of his completion of Joint
Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) be declared void.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-01471
in Executive Session on 17 October 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-01471:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 21 Jun 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSCES, dated 16 Jul 06
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 2 Aug 06.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFPC/JA, dated 11 Aug 06.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Aug 06.
CHARLENE M. BRADELY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-01471
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that his Active Duty
Service Commitment (ADSC) of 16 November 2011, incurred as a result of his
completion of Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) be,
and hereby is, declared void.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01229 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) be reduced from ten (10) years to eight (8) years; and, that the start date of his ADSC be changed from Mar 01 to Jan 99. He was cleared...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02175
The applicant elected to DOR and requested reclassification, which was considered by a panel of five senior officers. Based on the Air Force requirements, the applicants skills, education, desires, and his commanders recommendation, the panel determined his reclassification was not in the best interest of the Air Force. The complete JA evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants...
On 12 November 1996, the applicant was notified of his commander's intent to impose nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ. On 13 December 1996, the applicant was notified of the commander’s intent to file the Article 15 in his Officer Selection Record (OSR). On 11 April 1997, the squadron commander recommended the applicant for “all of his requested Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) selections and locations.” No documentation exists as to how the applicant entered JUNT except...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00937
This exam is required for all students being considered for elimination to ensure students are “medically qualified at the time of any non-medical disenrollment.” As a result, the applicant was to be reinstated into training following a Medical Hold status to resolve the medical issue. At the time of her elimination, there was a policy allowing up to 6 months in Medical Hold before students would be considered for elimination. Then following the 3-month Medical Hold, the Flight Surgeon...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00812
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00812 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments, Note 1, The Air Force Academy classes of 1998 and 1999 will incur an ADSC of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03312
Although the duty history was incorrect, DPPPO does not believe it was the basis for his DNP recommendation and nonselection to the grade of captain. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant requested his case be administratively closed in order to gather information necessary to respond to the Air Force evaluations. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01740
DPF’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He contends he accepted a 10-year ADSC under the premise he would complete the flying program and be utilized as a pilot. Upon being disqualified from the flying program, he feels the ADSC should be waived as the Air Force can no longer benefit from his training. He is not ever aware of being treated for CFS and notes symptoms for both...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01622
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His request for separation was disapproved even though the Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records (AFBCMR) rescinded his Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT)-incurred Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) of 18 October 2011 and the Record of Proceedings (AFBCMR Document Number BC-2004- 02126) stated that ACC/DOT would not hold him to his 10 June 2007 ADSC. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01440
The course is a grueling three- day training in airsickness management for student pilots. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DOF recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his package proves his desire and willingness to complete any program that he may be selected for in the future.
On 12 March 1998, the applicant was presented an OFFICER/AIRMAN ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE COMMITMENT (ADSC) COUNSELING STATEMENT, AF Form 63, acknowledging that he would incur an eight-year ADSC upon completion of PV4PC (apparently pilot training), but he declined to sign the form. The issue of whether applicant had knowledge of his eight-year commitment becomes muddled because Academy graduates did not sign an AF Form 63 (or any other documentation) specifically setting out the commitment length...