Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01194
Original file (BC-2006-01194.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied




                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01194
            INDEX CODE:  131.01

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  20 OCT 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be provided Special Selection Board consideration for  continuation
by the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05) Air Force  Reserve  Selected  Reserve
Lieutenant Colonel Selective Continuation Lieutenant Board.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When the board convened, his primary Air Force Specialty  Code  (AFSC)
was incorrectly listed as 16G; therefore, he was  not  considered  for
continuation.  This change was made without his concurrence and should
have been listed as 21R instead, which would have  made  him  eligible
for consideration for continuation.

In support of his appeal, the applicant  provided  extracts  from  his
military  personnel   records,   to   include   an   AF   Form   2096,
Classification/On-The-Job Training Action,  and  a  Data  Verification
Brief.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Information extracted from the Personnel Data System  (PDS)  indicates
that the applicant is currently serving in the Air  Force  Reserve  in
the grade of lieutenant colonel.

The remaining  relevant  facts  pertaining  to  this  application  are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the  Air
Force.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPB recommends denial noting the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF)
convened the CY05 Lieutenant  Colonel  Continuation  Board  (CY05  Air
Force  Reserve   Selected   Reserve   Lieutenant   Colonel   Selective
Continuation Board) on  17  Oct  05.   The  eligibility  criteria  was
established as:  a Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) based on  28  years
of commissioned service expiring between 1 Jan 06 and  31  Dec  06;  a
Primary Air Force Specialty Code (PAFSC) or Duty AFSC  (DAFSC)  manned
at 95 percent or less; officers having rated  skills;  and  lieutenant
colonels belonging to the Selected Reserve or serving Limited Extended
Active Duty (LEAD)  tours  of  three  years  or  less.   According  to
ARPC/DPB, at the time the CY05 Lieutenant Colonel  Continuation  Board
convened, the applicant was assigned to a PAFSC of 16G4 and a DAFSC of
13S4.  Neither of the AFSCs met the manning criteria of 95 percent  or
below.  The governing instruction requires an officer to monitor their
own eligibility and ensure their own selection record is correct.  Due
diligence on the part of the applicant could have  resolved  the  AFSC
issue prior to the board convening date.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jun
06 for review and response within  30  days.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   The  applicant's  complete
submission was thoroughly  reviewed  and  his  contentions  were  duly
noted.  However, we do not find  the  applicant’s  assertions  or  his
supporting  documentation  sufficiently  persuasive  to  override  the
rationale provided by the Air Force office of  primary  responsibility
(OPR).  Therefore, in the absence  of  evidence  which  shows  to  our
satisfaction  the  applicant  met   the   established   criteria   for
consideration by the CY05 Lieutenant Colonel  Continuation  Board,  or
was treated differently from others similarly situated, we agree  with
the recommendation of the OPR and adopt the rationale presented as the
basis for our decision that the applicant has failed  to  sustain  his
burden  of  establishing  he  has  suffered  either  an  error  or  an
injustice.  Accordingly, we find  no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01194 in Executive Session on 12 Jul 06, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
      Ms. Judith B. Oliva, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Apr 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 24 May 06.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jun 06.




                                   B. J. WHITE-OLSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00284

    Original file (BC-2006-00284.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00284 INDEX CODE: 100.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Continuation Board with a Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) of 14N4 (Intelligence) rather than...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01367

    Original file (BC-2005-01367.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CY2004 Lt Colonel Selective Continuation Board considered officers whose primary, duty, secondary, or tertiary Air Force Specialty (PAFSC, DAFSC, 2AFSC, 3AFSC) was manned at 95% or less. The applicant does not have a 3AFSC. As stated, the applicant made no effort prior to any promotion or continuation board to update his AFSCs or his Duty History to reflect what he states today is the correct information.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00808

    Original file (BC-2008-00808.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPB states if his DAFSC was in fact in error, this error was his responsibility to discover prior to the promotion board in accordance with AFI 36-2504, Officer or Promotion, Continuations and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force which states officers will monitor their own eligibility and ensure their selection record is correct and up- to-date before the convening of the selection board. His OSB reflected the correct DAFSC based on the position he was filling and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02848

    Original file (BC-2002-02848.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reviewed his record prior to the promotion board and at the time he had the understanding that his record was correct. After reviewing the evidence of record, we note that the applicant's PAFSC, as reflected on his OSB, was incorrect when he was considered for promotion by the FY03 major selection board. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-02848 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00702

    Original file (BC-2007-00702.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s record reflects his Duty Title as Assistant to the Commander, effective 4 Nov 00. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). The Board noted the comments provided by the applicant and the evidence submitted in his behalf; however, the Director, Selection Board Secretariat, has conducted a thorough review of the evidence of record and addressed the issue presented by the applicant and we are in agreement with his opinion and recommendation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800628

    Original file (9800628.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    We reviewed the statement provided by the additional rater/reviewer on the 2 June 1997 OPR, who indicated it was his intention that the report be included in the applicant’s record considered by the cited selection board. We also noted applicant‘s contention that his primary AFSC was incorrect on his “selection Report on Individual Personnel.” However, primary A F S C s are not reflected on officer selection briefs reviewed by promotion selection boards, only the member’s duty AFSCs are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01792

    Original file (BC-2006-01792.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since his retention/retirement (R/R) date and the promotion board dates are out of synchronization, the promotion boards have been unable to see how active he has been in the Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends the applicant’s request be denied. The applicant met all the eligibility requirements for consideration by the FY06 and FY07 Reserve Line and Nonline Major Selection Boards that convened at HQ ARPC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04145

    Original file (BC-2011-04145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPD recommends denial of the applicant's request for a corrected OSB, and SSB consideration for CY10 and CY11 Lt Col Promotion Boards. According to AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Paragraph 9.2, only Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02254

    Original file (BC-2003-02254.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02254 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 1988 through 1999 entries in the assignment history portion of his Officer Pre-Selection Brief (OPB) be corrected to reflect his correct duty history and that he be considered for a position vacancy (PV) promotion by a Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1998-03235

    Original file (BC-1998-03235.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    If not selected for promotion to the grade of major, he be considered for continuation until the completion of 20 years of service. The applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of major by an SSB, which convened on 1 March 1999, for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board. The applicant was notified by letter, 7 January 1999, that SSB consideration had been granted for the FY99 Line and Nonline Major Promotion Board (2 March 1998).