RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00798
INDEX NUMBER: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 September 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to reenlist retroactively as of Apr 04 for the maximum
years and months possible and also be made eligible to apply for a
follow-on assignment.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was misinformed regarding his reenlistment.
He received notice in Mar 04 he had received a follow-on assignment to
Alaska. When he inquired about retainability at his military
personnel flight (MPF), he was advised to get a career job reservation
(CJR) and to reenlist. He applied for a CJR on 13 Apr 04 and received
notification a couple of days later it was approved and that he could
start his paperwork to reenlist. However, after he submitted his
paperwork, he received an e-mail stating he could not reenlist because
he was a first-term airman and could not reenlist any earlier than 59
months. He was also advised he had lost his assignment to Alaska. He
also lost the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for his career field.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Air Force on 26 May 99 on a six-year
enlistment. This established his date of separation (DOS) as 25 May
05. On 25 Jan 05, he was approved for a 14-month in place consecutive
overseas tour (IPCOT), which established his DOS as 25 Jul 06.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request for
retroactive reenlistment and award of an SRB.
AFI 36-2602, Reenlistment in the USAF, outlines the requirements for
reenlistment eligibility of first-term airmen. As a six-year
enlistee, the applicant must have had at least 60 consecutive months
of service on his current enlistment and serving in the grade of
senior airman or higher. The applicant was not eligible to reenlist
at any time prior to May 04. Since he has not reenlisted, he also is
not eligible for an SRB
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPAAS3 recommends denial of the applicant’s request for a follow-
on assignment.
The applicant was required to obtain 36 months retainability for his
assignment to Alaska before he could make a permanent change of
station (PCS) move. He could not obtain retainability for the follow-
on due to reenlistment rules in effect at the time. Consequently, his
assignment was cancelled. He should have provided additional
Continental United States (CONUS) preferences to his MPF for a follow-
on assignment. He was assigned to the CONUS in accordance with AFI 36-
2110.
They note that the applicant may apply for the first-term airman base
of preference program (AFI 36-2110, Atch 2 for CONUS locations only)
or compete for an overseas assignment by using the overseas Enlisted
Quarterly Assignment Listing (EQUAL).
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
14 Apr 06 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice warranting corrective action by
this Board. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and
applicant’s complete submission, we are not persuaded that the
applicant should be given the relief requested. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however we found no evidence showing an
error was made or that he was miscounseled at any time. Therefore, we
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices
of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-
00798 in Executive Session on 18 May 2006, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 24 Mar 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPAAS3, dated 7 Apr 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated dated 14 Apr 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03595
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03595 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 25, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he reenlisted into the 1N531 (intelligence) Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) instead of the 3P071 (security forces) AFSC. AFPC Reenlistments advised the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01531
As a result of the removal of his CJR, the applicant was subsequently released from active duty. Accordingly, the Board recommended the applicant be reinstated to active duty, provided a constructive reenlistment with entitlement to an SRB, and provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of staff. The applicant has not provided any statements from the individuals who had the responsibility for supervising him and evaluating his performance.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00469
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00469 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “3D”, “Second term or career airman who refused to get PCS or TDY assignment retainability”, be changed to one that will allow him to reenlist in the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02693
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to AFI 36-2606, paragraph 2.8., to be eligible for a Zone C SRB, airmen must complete at least 10 but no more than 14 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS) (including current enlistment and periods of active duty) on the date of reenlistment or beginning an extension of enlistment; reenlist or extend their enlistments (in one increment) in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) for at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199
AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02073
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02073 INDEX CODE: 110.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jan 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Extended Active Duty (EAD) date be changed from 25 Oct 05 to 11 Aug 05 to prevent a break in service, restore her promotion line number, and clear a debt for back pay and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05612
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, that extension or reenlistment in Aug 2012 still would not have made the applicant eligible for the SRB because member's have to be a 3-skill level in the SRB career field at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919
They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...