Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03899
Original file (BC-2005-03899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03899
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  24 MAR 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Prisoner-of-War (POW) Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes he is entitled to the POW medal because  he  was  held  in
Manila during a coup attempt against the Philippine Government.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s records reflect he enlisted in the Air National  Guard
on 29 September 1982 and served until 19 April 1984.  He then enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 20 April 1984, was progressively  promoted
to the grade of staff sergeant and received an honorable discharge  on
20 December 1994, after completion of  required  active  service.   He
enlisted in the Air  Force  Reserves  on  21  December  1994  and  was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior master sergeant.

In 1989, the applicant participated in a joint exercise in Manila with
the Philippine military.  While he was participating in the exercise a
coup attempt was made against the Philippine government in  which  the
armed rebels seized the hotel at which the applicant was staying.   He
and other military members were detained until they were  released  to
embassy personnel and escorted to the American Embassy.   After  being
debriefed he was flown by helicopter to Clark Air Base.

The applicant’s records reflect award of the  Air  Force  Commendation
Medal, w/2OLC, the Air Force Achievement Medal with w/1OLC and the Air
Force Good Conduct Medal w/2 Devices.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFC recommends denial.  DPFC states the  Department  of  Defense
Joint Publication 1-02 (as amended through 31 August 2005) (Attachment
2) defines “prisoner of war” as  “a  detained  person  as  defined  in
Articles 4 and 5 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of
Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949.  In particular,  one  who,  while
engaged in combat under orders of his government is  captured  by  the
armed forces of the enemy.  As such, he or  she  is  entitled  to  the
combatant’s privilege of  immunity  from  the  municipal  law  of  the
capturing state for warlike acts which do not amount  to  breaches  of
the law of armed conflict.  For example, a prisoner of war may be, but
is not limited to  any  person  belonging  to  one  of  the  following
categories who has fallen into the power of the enemy: a member of the
armed forces, organized militia  or  volunteer  corps;  a  person  who
accompanies the armed forces without being a member thereof; a  member
of a merchant marine or civilian aircraft crew not qualifying for more
favorable treatment; or individuals who, or  approach  of  the  enemy,
spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading  forces.”   Although
Joint Publication 1-02 definitions are not necessarily intended to  be
statements of policy, the definitions nonetheless are consistent  with
the language of the 1919 Geneva Prisoner of War Convention  and  other
law-of-war treaties.

According to DPFC the applicant was never held  captive  by  an  enemy
government or its agents, or a hostile  force  of  the  United  States
government, during a period of war.

The DPFC evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
Feb 06 for review and comment within 30 days.  As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the Board
was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Prisoner-of-War Medal.
 The Board notes no evidence was presented to show the  applicant  was
ever held captive by an enemy government or its agents, or  a  hostile
force of the United States government, during a  period  of  war.   We
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the  relief  sought  in
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence no considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2005-
03899 in Executive Session on 19 April 2006, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
                 Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Dec 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFC, dated 31 Jan 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 06.






      CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
      Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02842

    Original file (BC-2006-02842.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02842 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 MARCH 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect he was a Prisoner of War (POW). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02199

    Original file (BC-2006-02199.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflects he entered active duty on 30 October 1951. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends denial of the applicant request for POW status.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02884

    Original file (BC-2005-02884.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided extracts from his records and other documents associated with the matter under review. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 14 Oct 05 for review and response. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Oct 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02665

    Original file (BC-2008-02665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53- 55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, a list of prisoners at Camp Hunenberg, a copy of an escape attempt military police report and other associated documents pertaining to his internment. The complete AFPC/DPWC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provides the definition of a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00674

    Original file (BC-2006-00674.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 July 1944, the applicant’s family was notified by the Adjutant General’s Office of the War Department that he was safe and interned in Sweden (a neutral country). The documentation the applicant provided and his military personnel records reflect the applicant was an internee in a neutral country and was returned to military control on 7 November 1944. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00563

    Original file (BC-2004-00563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Army’s definition of internment as a person interned as a POW or enemy alien, he should be identified as a former POW and receive the POW medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that Title 10, United States Code, Section 101(32), defines “former prisoner of war” as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00736

    Original file (BC-2010-00736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00736 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. POW status to internees in Switzerland requires the Secretary of the Air Force to determine that Swiss officials were acting on behalf of a foreign armed force hostile to the United States during...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01883

    Original file (BC-2010-01883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01883 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. POW status to internees in Switzerland requires the Secretary of the Air Force to determine that Swiss officials were acting on behalf of a foreign armed force hostile to the United States during World...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03600

    Original file (BC-2010-03600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the POW Medal. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If he had POW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02213

    Original file (BC-2010-02213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In contrast, “interned” is defined as “the casualty is definitely known to have been taken into custody of a non belligerent foreign power as a result of and for reasons arising out of any armed conflict in which the Armed Forces of the United...