Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03512
Original file (BC-2005-03512.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03512
                                             INDEX CODE:  100.00
      XXXXXXX                           COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 May 2007


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show  that  he  declined  Servicemembers’  Group
Life Insurance (SGLI) and he be reimbursed for the  premiums  deducted  from
his pay.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was assigned  Temporary  Duty  (TDY)  and  was  unable  to  decline  SGLI
coverage in person.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is currently  serving  on  active  duty  in  the  grade  of  staff
sergeant.

Public Law 109-13 automatically increased the level of  SGLI  coverage  from
$250,000 to $400,000, effective 1  September  2005.   Members  eligible  for
SGLI on 31 August 2005 with continued eligibility on 1 September 2005  would
have  their  SGLI  increased  to  $400,000  effective  1   September   2005,
regardless of any prior election.

On 7  November  2005,  applicant  completed  an  SGLV  8286  declining  SGLI
coverage.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFC recommends the application be denied and  states,  in  part,  that
Edwards AFB leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the  new
program and that applicant had adequate time during the month  of  September
2005 to make a new election and avoid the increased premiums.  In  addition,
information was on the  August  through  October  2005,  Leave  and  Earning
Statements  (LESs).   Applicant  has  not  provided  any  documentation   to
indicate that he was not aware of this  change  and  his  responsibility  to
make a new election and avoid the increased premium.

The AFPC/DPFC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the evaluation was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  30
December 2005, for review and comment, within 30 days.  However, as of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________





The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2005-03512
in Executive Session on 14 February 2006, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                       Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
                       Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Dec 05.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFC, dated 27 Dec 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Dec 05.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03673

    Original file (BC-2005-03673.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he filed a Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, SGLV – 8286, on 1 September 2005, declining coverage. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005- 03673 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03866

    Original file (BC-2005-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPFC concludes, because the applicant did not complete a new SGLV 8286, declining coverage until 14 Dec 05, he was also covered at the higher amount and was charged for the increased coverage for the period 1 Sep -31 Dec 05. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03493

    Original file (BC-2005-03493.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. As stated, it is our opinion that the Ellsworth AFB leadership took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01187

    Original file (BC-2006-01187.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01187 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 October 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) premiums deducted from his pay from 1 September 2005 through 31 January 2006. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03487

    Original file (BC-2005-03487.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note that Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. On 19 May 2005, she again declined FSGLI coverage and has been refunded the premiums from June 2005 through October 2005. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01073

    Original file (BC-2006-01073.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPFC explains the law mandated that coverage for spouses (to include military-married-to- military couples (mil-to-mil)) and dependent children automatically go into effect on the date of implementation so long as the member was insured under the SGLI program. She notes the article does not specifically mention mil-to-mil, or that your active duty spouse is considered your dependent for this program, or that if an election is not made payments would automatically be deducted from your pay. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00777

    Original file (BC-2006-00777.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00777 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 Sep 07 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record reflect she elected reduced coverage under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) effective 1 Sep 05, and is entitled to a $186.00 refund of premiums for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03592

    Original file (BC-2005-03592.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPW states the Air Force took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time between 1 November 2001 - 31 December 2001 to make an election decision. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02611

    Original file (BC-2005-02611.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 9 August 2005, the applicant completed an SGLV Form 8286A, Family Coverage Election, declining coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommended denial indicating Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01913

    Original file (BC-2006-01913.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums deducted from her pay for Family Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI). If her service record needs to be corrected, it must be to enroll her active duty spouse under...