Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03477
Original file (BC-2005-03477.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03477
                                       INDEX CODE:  110.00
      XXXXXXX                                COUNSEL: NONE

       XXXXXXX                                 HEARING  DESIRED:   NOT
INDICATED


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 MAY 2007


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable  conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Before he leaves the world, he would like his family to  be  proud  of
his service.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Available records indicate the applicant  entered  active  duty     13
July  1956  and  was  discharged  with  a  general  (under   honorable
conditions) discharge on 12 February  1959  in  the  grade  of  airman
basic. He served 2 years and 7 months.

The remaining applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed by
fire in 1973.  Therefore, the facts surrounding his service in the Air
Force cannot be verified.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Air Force was  not  able  to  evaluate  this  application  due  to
nonavailability of personnel records.

_________________________________________________________________

HE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  Based upon the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence
to the contrary, we must assume that  the  applicant's  discharge  was
proper and in compliance with appropriate directives.  The only  other
basis upon which to upgrade his discharge would be based on  clemency.
However, applicant has failed to provide documentation  pertaining  to
his post service activities.  Should he provide  documentary  evidence
pertaining to his post service  activities  we  would  be  willing  to
reconsider his appeal. Therefore, based on the available  evidence  of
record, we find  no  basis  upon  which  to  favorably  consider  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
03477 in Executive Session on 5 January 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
                 Mr. Charles E. Benneth, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Oct 05.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Reconstructed Personnel Records.





                                             JOHN B. HENNESSEY
                                             Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00682

    Original file (BC-2005-00682.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He prays the Board would do him honor in upgrading his discharge. Should he provide documentary evidence pertaining to his post service activities we would be willing to reconsider his appeal. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03339A

    Original file (BC-2005-03339A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03339 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03339

    Original file (BC-2005-03339.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS was unable to determine the propriety of the discharge based on the lack of documentation in the master personnel records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00286

    Original file (BC-2006-00286.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00286 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His father’s other than honorable discharge (undesirable) be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02212

    Original file (BC-2005-02212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry is not a recognizable award given by the Air Force. The applicant is probably requesting the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) medal, which was awarded sparingly during the early years of the Vietnam War, to the United States Army by the Republic of Vietnam, and later awarded by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00717

    Original file (BC-2005-00717.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 October 1992, applicant voluntarily submitted an AF Form 31, Airman's Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation requesting to be separated from active duty effective 5 December 1992. in Business Management and Economics.” On 5 December 1992, the applicant was separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airmen (voluntary - miscellaneous reasons), with an RE code of 3A and an honorable discharge. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03359

    Original file (BC-2005-03359.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03359 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) which were listed on the AFRS4 Fm#35-24, dated 4 Jul 45. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02698

    Original file (BC-2005-02698.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02698 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 FEBRUARY 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be changed to reflect the Scholastic Aptitute Test (SAT) scores based on the Airmen Qualification Examination (AQE) scores, along with a grade point average (GPA). The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01768

    Original file (BC-2005-01768.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01768 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant received four letters of counseling for failing to meet Air Force standards and his disregard for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00299

    Original file (BC-2005-00299.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is his intention to join the Air Force Reserves or Active Duty Air Force as an officer, however, he cannot do so with a RE code of 3D. On the back of this RIP, he initialed the statement, “I have read and understand the returnee counseling handout and DEROS options available to me.” Paragraph 4b of the returnee counseling handout specifically states, “If, by the 25th day of the 8th month prior to your DEROS, you are eligible to obtain retainability and take no action, the Military...