Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03359
Original file (BC-2005-03359.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03359
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  6 MAY 2007


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH)  Medal  and  the  Distinguished
Flying Cross (DFC) which were listed on the AFRS4  Fm#35-24,  dated
4 Jul 45.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been awarded the PH and the DFC.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Based on available records, applicant  enlisted  in  the  Army  Air
Corps on 14 Dec 43 and was honorably discharged on 5 Nov 45 in  the
grade of staff sergeant.  He was credited with 1 year,  10  months,
and 22 days of active military service, with 7 months and 5 days of
that time as foreign service.

He was awarded the World War II Victory Medal, Air Medal, with  One
Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (1SOLC), the  Euro-African  Middle  Eastern
(EAME) Campaign Ribbon, with 3 Bronze Stars, and the  Good  Conduct
Medal.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this  application  and  recommended  denial,
stating, in part, that applicant states he was awarded the DFC  and
the PH, but was never listed on his WD AGO Form 53-55.  His records
were burned in the National Personnel Record Center (NPRC) fire.

On 25 Jan 06, applicant was notified of the criteria for  award  of
the DFC and the PH.  He was asked to provide additional information
which would substantiate his claim; however, he did not respond.

They found  no  evidence  in  the  applicant’s  military  personnel
records that supports that he was awarded the DFC or was injured as
a direct result of enemy action; therefore, he is not  entitled  to
these award.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice.  AFPC/DPPPR  requested  supporting
documentation from the applicant to  substantiate  his  eligibility
for award of the Purple Heart and the Distinguished  Flying  Cross;
however, he did not respond.  The Board noted that the  applicant’s
records were burned  in  the  NPRC  fire.   Therefore,  should  the
applicant provide documentation to substantiate his claim, we would
be willing to reconsider his petition.  In view of  the  above,  we
find no basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2005-03359 in Executive Session on  18  April  2006,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
      Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
      Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Oct 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 9 Mar 06.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Mar 06.




                                   JOHN B. HENNESSEY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03616

    Original file (bc-2003-03616.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, his medical records indicate that he had an operation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and states, in part, that there is no evidence he was recommended for, or awarded the DFC. Should the applicant provide additional statements containing specific details regarding his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00449

    Original file (BC-2006-00449.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPPR states the NPRC was able to reconstruct a part of his military record; however, the complete record which may contain the documentation needed for the aforementioned awards was not found. Although the applicant’s entitlement to the requested awards could not be verified though his official records, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed documentation provided by the applicant, including a citation for the Distinguished Flying Cross and information taken from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00002

    Original file (BC-2006-00002.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00002 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUL 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Purple Heart (PH). The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-33, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01478

    Original file (BC-2003-01478.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR, on 10 June 2003, requested the applicant provide documentation to verify his eligibility for award of the PH. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records indicating he was recommended or awarded the PH. Without detailed documentation showing the date of the injury and the injury was incurred as a result of enemy action, or any other pertinent information that meets the criteria for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00128

    Original file (BC-2007-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02178

    Original file (BC-2005-02178.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02178 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 January 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His mission on 26 September 1944, be considered a combat mission and he be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01238

    Original file (BC-2005-01238.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the AM because he was assigned to the flight crew of the commander of the 84th Depot Repair Squadron, 15th Air Force, who was awarded the AM. Further, under the 1996 NDAA service members may request consideration of awards not previously eligible because of time limitations, provided the written recommendations be made by someone other than the member himself, in the member’s chain...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02301

    Original file (BC-2006-02301.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02301 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 4 FEBRUARY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) awards. It appears he was recommended for the DFC as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00538

    Original file (BC-2005-00538.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00538 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386

    Original file (BC-2004-00386.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...