RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00717
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for his separation be changed from voluntary to
hardship.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In late November 1991, it became imminently clear that he would not be
able to remain on active duty due to financial reasons; plainly
stated, he had more in monthly expenses than he was receiving in pay
as an airman. He would be able to rectify the situation by returning
to the workforce as a civilian. As a result of this, he was instructed
to apply for a discharge, voluntary and hardship, which he did. The
day he was to find out the status of his hardship discharge, the
voluntary separation - honorable was approved; unlikely timing but
that is how it happened. He would like to state that had he known he
would be ineligible for a Veteran’s loan as a result of accepting the
voluntary and not the hardship he would have definitely waited for the
hardship to go through. He joined the Air Force in full faith and
support of his government to serve in a time of conflict. He asks now
that his government returns the favor and grants his request.
In support of his appeal he provided a personal letter and a copy of
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 October 1991 for
a period of four years.
On 1 October 1992, applicant voluntarily submitted an AF Form 31,
Airman's Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in
Service Obligation requesting to be separated from active duty
effective 5 December 1992. The application was submitted under the
provisions of AFR 39-10, para 3-15 (miscellaneous reasons). The
applicant’s reason for submitting the application for separation was
“I wish to separate so that I may attend college on a full-time basis
so that I may attain my B.A. in Business Management and Economics.”
On 5 December 1992, the applicant was separated from the Air Force
under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airmen
(voluntary - miscellaneous reasons), with an RE code of 3A and an
honorable discharge. The applicant had a total of 1 year, 2 months and
5 days of total active military service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and stated that there is no
documentation on file in the master personnel records indicating
applicant ever applied for separation for hardship reasons.
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records,
the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge was within the
discretion of the discharge authority.
Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no
facts warranting a change to the narrative reason for separation.
AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
18 March 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
there has been no response received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant's submission, we do not find his
uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. In
this respect, we note that the applicant requested an early separation
from the Air Force to attend college. Therefore, we agree with the
opinions and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having
suffered either an error or injustice. Applicant has not provided any
documentation pertaining to his alleged hardship that occurred on
active duty. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-00717 in Executive Session on 4 May 2005, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
Mr. Albert C. Ellett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 Mar 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Mar 05.
JOHN B. HENNESSEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03295
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03295 INDEX NUMBER: 110.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 FEBRUARY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation, trial by court-martial, be changed. The narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) indicates...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02948
Please consider the time he has spent in the U.S. Army after he was discharged from the U.S. Air Force; it was eight years or more. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Applicant did not submit any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00717
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The OPR notes the evidence in the applicant’s military records is insufficient to determine the exact facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00717 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02495
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02495 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 FEB 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Reduction in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00993 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed; however, it appears that his request is to have his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3D (second term or...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00089
On 15 December 2004, he was separated under the provisions of the Air Force Shaping Program, Phase II, AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (miscellaneous/general reasons) from the Air Force with an honorable discharge. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his reason for separation should be changed. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00335
The administrative discharge board recommended that applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. Applicant reviewed the FBI report and stated that he was in his house at the time of the alleged incident in question.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02254
On 2 January 1992, applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for misconduct-civil conviction. On 6 January 1992, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Civil Conviction and received a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 9 April 1996, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) denied his application and concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01278
He began to look for means to support his addiction for which he was convicted. Civilian court conviction consisted of confinement from 21 Feb 56 – 17 Mar 56 (36 days). On 10 Sep 69, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded and for a waiver to permit reenlistment.