ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03339
INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Available records indicate the applicant entered active duty 2
June 1960 and was discharged with an under other than honorable
conditions (UOTHC) discharge on 15 August 1962 in the grade of airman
basic.
The remaining applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed by
fire in 1973. Therefore, the facts surrounding his service in the Air
Force cannot be verified.
On 27 October 2005, the applicant's request that his (UOTHC) discharge
be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) was considered and
denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
On 13 February 2006, the applicant's State Representative submitted a
letter of support for reconsideration on his behalf. The applicant's
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant an upgrade of his
discharge. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the
letter of support from his State Representative, we see no evidence of
an error in this case and remain unpersuaded that he has been the
victim of an injustice. At the time he was discharged from the Air
Force, he was furnished a discharge predicated upon the quality of his
service and the circumstances of his discharge. We are not persuaded
by the evidence provided in support of his appeal that the decision to
discharge him was improper or unjust; or, that an upgrade of the
discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. In view of the
foregoing, we find no basis to favorably consider this application.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
____________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
03339 in Executive Session on 27 April 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, member
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jun 04, with exhibits A
through D.
Exhibit F. State Representative's Letter, dtd 13 Feb 06.
JOHN B. HENNESSEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03339
He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS was unable to determine the propriety of the discharge based on the lack of documentation in the master personnel records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1986-03661-2A
We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the RE code be upgraded on the basis of clemency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03477
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03477 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 MAY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00682
He prays the Board would do him honor in upgrading his discharge. Should he provide documentary evidence pertaining to his post service activities we would be willing to reconsider his appeal. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00395A
The applicant's report on individual personnel records review printout dated 1 September 1984, verify and confirm the following dates of temporary duty (TDY) in Korea (see Exhibit B): September 1981 TDY to Korea 22 days August 1983 TDY to Korea 24 days February 1982 TDY to Germany 20 days On 18 April 2006, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00286
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00286 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His father’s other than honorable discharge (undesirable) be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00835
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and six character reference letters. However, documentation provided by the applicant in support of his appeal is over 13 years old. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01768
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01768 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant received four letters of counseling for failing to meet Air Force standards and his disregard for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02948
Please consider the time he has spent in the U.S. Army after he was discharged from the U.S. Air Force; it was eight years or more. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Applicant did not submit any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02441
In support of his request applicant provided a copy of his original PRF and corrected PRF, a letter of support from his senior rater, AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports and a letter from the Supplemental Management Level Review (MLR) President, and AFPC/DPPPE. AFPC/DPPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPP amended its previous Air Force evaluation to state the ERAB failed to consider the case after the AF...