RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03365
INDEX NUMBER: 113.01
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 May 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be granted an extension of his mandatory service date (MSD) to 14
Nov 08.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His request for an extension of his MSD did not get processed prior to
his MSD expiring.
In support of his appeal, applicant provides a copy of his request for
retention, dated 12 Oct 05, a copy of his commander’s recommended
approval, dated 1 Nov 05, and extracts from his medical records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to information in the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS), the applicant was a chaplain serving in the grade of
lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve at the time of his
application. His mandatory service date was 14 Nov 05. The applicant
had 27 years of satisfactory service as of 21 Dec 05.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/HC recommends denial of the applicant’s request. They note the
applicant only initiated his request for an extension thirty-two days
prior to his MSD and not six months prior as required. HC also notes
the applicant was advised by the AFRC Command Chaplain he could not
justify recommending approval of an MSD extension for a retirement
eligible Lt Col chaplain. The abundance of requests for Air Force
Reserve chaplains to provide support for the Global War on Terror and
other contingencies are for chaplains in the grade of captain and
major.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
30 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
03365 in Executive Session on 9 August 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Panel Chair
Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for Docket Number BC-
2005-03365:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memo, HQ AFRC/HC, dated 26 Jun 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jun 06.
CHRISTOPHER D. CAREY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03038
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her original MSD extension request and correspondence related to the matter under review. On 15 Dec 08, NGB/A1POE recommended approval; however, the ANG Chief of Chaplains (NGB/HC) subsequently recommended denial, indicating the applicant’s retention was not in the best interests of the Air Force. However, inasmuch as the Board lacks the authority to reinstate applicants into the ANG, we believe the proper and fitting relief in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01701
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Commander, Air Force Reserve Command concurred and forwarded the request to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) on 22 Jun 10. The applicant’s initial request for an extension of her MSD was received and processed in a timely manner.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02405
In the alternative, applicant requests his MSD be changed to reflect 20 March 2010, based on the date he should have been assigned to ISLRS (24 Aug 84) versus the date he was assigned (19 Oct 84). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP states Reserve officers generally remain assigned to ISLRS for three years after which time they can be screened for an administrative discharge board, tender their resignation, or transfer to a...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03908
His Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) of 31 October 2008 be extended six months to allow adequate time to process a request for an MSD extension through Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) channels to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for a final determination. In October 2007, the applicant was notified by certified letter of the requirements for requesting an MSD extension. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05293
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05293 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reserve pay debt he incurred for military duty performed/paid from 16 July to 13 Aug 13 be waived. In an e-mail dated 16 Sep 13, the 940th Force Support Squadron (940 FSS) advised him that his MSD would be adjusted to the date he resigned his ART position, 13 Jul 13. However, because this date was in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05117
In addition, there was the sense at the time that allowing the applicant to remain in the AFRC/SG2 position would block other 41As from career progression into that position. A complete copy of the AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit C. SAF/MRBP recommends denial of the applicants request for an MSD extension and/or reinstatement, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01337 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the FY05 Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline Colonel Promotion Selection Board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02046
He was released from active duty on 11 January 1991 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested an extension to her MSD to allow her the opportunity to complete 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement. In this respect, we note the applicant timely requested an extension of her 31 Dec 12 MSD in Mar 12;...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006--01185
It is A1BL’s opinion the applicant has not provided information that substantiates an error or injustice occurred in his reassignment to the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC). We note the applicant’s contentions that he was unaware of his participation requirements in the Reserve following his separation from active duty; however, his assignment order, dated 8 February 1999, clearly identifies his participation requirements as 24 IDT periods and a 12-14 day annual tour per fiscal year. ...